 At the close of the evidence counsel for the bank moved the court to direct the jury to return a verdict in its favor, which motion the court overruled, and counsel for the bank excepted.  The Federal Reporter - 13. lappuse1925Pilnskats - Par šo grāmatu
 | Illinois. Supreme Court - 1907 - 712 lapas
...District, and a further appeal has been prosecuted to this court. At the close of all the evidence the defendant moved the court to direct the jury to return a verdict in its favor, which the court declined to do, and the first reason urged as a ground of reversal is the action of the court... | |
 | Ohio. Supreme Court - 1918 - 760 lapas
...for Monroe, Michigan, and two to Pittsburg, Pennsylvania. At the close of plaintiff's evidence, the defendant moved the court to direct the jury to return a verdict in favor of the defendant, which motion was sustained, to which plaintiff duly excepted. Motion for new... | |
 | Utah. Supreme Court, Albert Hagan, John Augustine Marshall, John Maxcy Zane, James A. Williams, Joseph M. Tanner, George L. Nye, John Walcott Thompson, August B. Edler, Alonzo Blair Irvine, Harmel L. Pratt, William S. Dalton, H. Arnold Rich - 1917 - 772 lapas
...operating an approaching train. Upon substantially the foregoing evidence relating to the accident the defendant moved the court to direct the jury to return a verdict in its favor on the first cause of action. The court denied the motion and submitted the case, in so far as the... | |
 | Utah. Supreme Court, Albert Hagan, John Augustine Marshall, John Maxcy Zane, James A. Williams, Joseph M. Tanner, George L. Nye, John Walcott Thompson, August B. Edler, Alonzo Blair Irvine, Harmel L. Pratt, William S. Dalton, H. Arnold Rich - 1910 - 688 lapas
...other railroads is likewise assigned as error. At the close of the evidence the appellant requested the court to direct the jury to return a verdict in its favor upon the ground that respondent was precluded from recovering as a matter of law. The court refused... | |
 | 1925 - 1124 lapas
...the evidence produced by the respective parties. At the close of all the evidence defendant's counsel moved the court to direct the jury to return a verdict in its favor, the court denied the motion, the defendant excepted, and this and other rulings are assigned as errors.... | |
 | 1904 - 1108 lapas
...conclusion of the evidence the claimant below, who is the plaintiff in error here, requested the trial court to direct the jury to return a verdict in its favor, on the ground that there was no substantial evidence to sustain the charge which was contained in the... | |
 | 1902 - 1166 lapas
...and AA Parsons, arid the violation of It by him. Had plaintiff, at the conclusion of the evidence, moved the court to direct the jury to return a verdict In his favor, the motion should have been granted. This being the case, it is immaterial whether some... | |
 | 1920 - 960 lapas
...rested its case at the close of (11« NB) the plaintiff's evidence, and thereafter each of the parties moved the court to direct the Jury to return a verdict in its favor, that action by both parties operated to waive the jury and submit the case to the court on the evidence... | |
 | 1895 - 1162 lapas
...essential to Its sufficiency. At the close of the appellee's evidence, the appellant filed a motion asking the court to direct the Jury to return a verdict In Its favor, which motion was overruled. By subsequently proceeding to Introduce Its evidence, It waived any error In... | |
| |
