& Indexes see same topic and KEY I. CREATION AND EXISTENCE OF THE RELATION. ~~~5(1) (App.D.C.) Relationship between owner and occupant held that of master and servant, and not of landlord and tenant.-Turner v. Mertz, 3 F. (2d) 348. III. LANDLORD'S TITLE AND REVERSION. (B) Estoppel of Tenant. 61 (U.S.D.C.N.Y.) Tenant may not question landlord's title.-Jones v. Peacock, 3 F. (2d) 827. Defendants' counterclaim in action for rent held attempt to question landlord's title.-Id. IV. TERMS FOR YEARS. (D) Termination. 103(1) (U.S.D.C.Pa.) Lessee cannot plead equities of its subtenants to avoid forfeiture of the lease.-Vincent v. National Drug Stores, 3 F. (2d) 504. LICENSES. I. FOR OCCUPATIONS AND PRIVILEGES. 8(1) (App.D.C.) Statute specifically enumerating classes of business requiring consent of adjoining property owners présumed not applicable to business not enumerated.-Coombe v. U. S. ex rel. Selis, 3 F. (2d) 714. 22 (App.D.C.) Consent of adjoining property owners not condition to issuance of license to junk dealer.-Coombe v. U. S. ex rel. Selis, 3 F.(2d) 714. 37 (App.D.C.) Police regulation requiring consent of adjoining owners to operation of junkshop held not to require consent on transfer of business, in view of administrative interpretation.-Coombe v. U. S. ex rel. Selis, 3 F. (2d) 714. Transfer of license, called to licensing officer's attention, notice that assignee has succeeded to assignor's right to have business licensed.-Id. LIENS. 107 (U.S.D.C.Pa.) Landlord held entitled See Maritime Liens; Mechanics' Liens. to terminate lease for nonpayment of taxes.Vincent v. National Drug Stores, 3 F. (2d) 504. VIII. RENT AND ADVANCES. 223(1) (U.S.D.C.N.Y.) Lessee's counterclaim, in action for rent, seeking cancellation of instruments, held equitable.-Jones v. Peacock, 3 F. (2d) 827. LIMITATION OF ACTIONS. II. COMPUTATION OF PERIOD OF (H) Commercement of Action or Other 124 (U.S.C.C.A.S.C.) Underwriters' petition of intervention in shipper's action against owner for delay held not to state new cause of action.-U. S. v. Middleton, 3 F. (2d) 384. III. ACKNOWLEDGMENT, NEW PROMISE, AND PART PAYMENT. 157(2) (U.S.D.C.Pa.) Payment from which no promise may be implied will not toll the statute.-Charles Warner Co. v. Nazareth Cement Co., 3 F. (2d) 152. Payment held not to toll statute.-Id. LIQUOR SELLING. 223 (2) (U.S.D.C.N.Y.) Defendant in action for rent held not entitled to counterclaim for cancellation of lease, supplemental agreement, and bond on ground of failure to perfect See Intoxicating Liquors. title.-Jones v. Peacock, 3 F. (2d) 827. Defendant in action for rent held not entitled to cancellation of instruments making lease ineffectual on lessors' failure to perfect title.-Id. (D) Distress. 264 (U.S.C.C.A.Del.) Statute by which third party's goods on leased premises are made subject to distraint held not repealed by Conditional Sales Act.-In re Brittingham Mfg. Co., 3 F. (2d) 807. LEASE. See Landlord and Tenant. LEGISLATIVE POWER. See Constitutional Law, 55. LIBEL AND SLANDER. 1. WORDS AND ACTS ACTIONABLE, AND LIABILITY THEREFOR. 21 (App.D.C.) Newspaper item reporting arrest of "Harry Kennedy, an attorney," held libelous as to "Harry F. Kennedy," only attorney in city. Washington Post Co. v. Kennedy, 3 F. (2d) 207. IV. ACTIONS. (B) Parties, Preliminary Proceedings, and Pleading. 77 (U.S.C.C.A.III.) Under Illinois laws, action for libel of reciprocal insurance association may not be maintained by its attorney in fact in own name.-John L. Walker Co. v. National Underwriters' Co., 3 F. (2d) 102. LITERARY PROPERTY. 2 (U.S.D.C.Ga.) Scenario of photoplay is property entitled to protection in equity.Thompson v. Famous Players-Lasky Corporation, 3 F. (2d) 707. LOGS AND LOGGING. 2 (U.S.C.C.A.Cal.) Contract for sale of timber land held valid and enforceable.-Ward v. Pearsall, 3 F.(2d) 365. MALICIOUS PROSECUTION. or II. WANT OF PROBABLE CAUSE. 16 (App.D.C.) Either probable cause want of malice defense.-Chapman v. Anderson, 3 F. (2d) 336. 22 (App.D.C.) Advice of prosecuting attorney held probable cause.-Chapman v. Anderson, 3 F. (2d) 336. 23 (App.D.C.) Lack of probable cause not inferred from malice.-Chapman v. Anderson, 3 F. (2d) 336. III. MALICE. 32 (App.D.C.) Malice presumed from lack of probable cause.-Chapman v. Anderson, 3 F. (2d) 336. V. ACTIONS. 56 (App.D.C.) Matters to be proved stated. -Chapman v. Anderson, 3 F. (2d) 336. 71(2) (App.D.C.) Probable cause question Anderson, 3 F. (2d) 336. of law, if facts are undisputed.-Chapman v. Refusal to instruct facts proved constituted probable cause held error.-Id. 7 (U.S.C.C.A.N.Y.) Food and supplies for passengers are necessaries.-The Gdansk, 3 F. (2d) 565. 8 (U.S.C.C.A.N.Y.) Contract to supply food to alien passengers while temporarily removed to quarantine station held not to give maritime lien on vessel.-The Gdansk, 3 F.(2d) 565. 9 (U.S.D.C.Mass.) Services rendered in fumigating baggage of passengers held to give right to lien. The Susquehanna, 3 F. (2d) 1014. 12 (U.S.C.C.A.N.Y.) Immigration Act held not to create lien on vessel for maintenance of alien passengers, temporarily removed to quarantine station.-The Gdansk, 3 F. (2d) 565. (B) Under Statutory Provisions. 24 (U.S.D.C.N.C.) Statute held not to bar proof that supplies or equipment were furnished on credit to owner alone.-The Defiance, 3 F. (2d) 48. Sale of marine engine to owner of vessel on credit of owner alone held not to create lien. -Id. Seller's opinion that maritime lien existed held not to create lien.-Id. Lien defeated by failure to make delivery of engine to vessel's side.-Id. One who advanced money on personal credit of master for purchase of marine engine acquired no lien.-İd. 25 (U.S.D.C.Md.) Stevedoring rendered to ship not in home port lienable.-In re Atlantic, Gulf & Pacific S. S. Co., 3 F.(2d) 309. 25 (U.S.D.C.Mass.) Services rendered in fumigating baggage of passengers held to give right to lien; necessaries."-The Susquehanna, 3 F. (2d) 1014. 25 (U.S.D.C.Mass.) Use of canal held a "necessary."-In re Burton S. S. Co., 3 F. (2d) 1015. MARRIAGE. See Divorce; Husband and Wife. I. THE RELATION. (B) Statutory Regulation. 13 (U.S.C.C.A.III.), Yardmaster directing train movements held "operator, train dispatcher, or other employee," within Hours of Service Act.-Atchison, T. & S. F. Ry. Co. v. U. S., 3 F. (2d) 138. Telephone communications by yardmaster as to train movement held "orders," within Hours of Service Act.-Id. II. SERVICES AND COMPENSATION. (A) Performance of Services. 62 (U.S.D.C.Me.) Employer held to have irrevocable license to use invention made and patented by employee.-Scott v. Madison Woolen Co., 3 F. (2d) 331. (B) Wages and Other Remuneration. 69 (U.S.D.C.III.) Whether action of Labor Board is arbitrary determined by character of act itself.-Railroad Labor Board v. Robertson, 3 F. (2d) 488. III. MASTER'S LIABILITY FOR INJURIES (B) Tools, Machinery, Appliances, Places for Work. and 101, 102(8) (U.S.C.C.A.N.J.) Reasonable care required in providing appliances and place of work.-Standard Oil Co. of New Jersey v. De Vries, 3 F. (2d) 852. 103(1) (U.S.C.C.A.N.J.) Master's duty nondelegable.-Standard Oil Co. of New Jersey v. De Vries, 3 F. (2d) 852. (G) Contributory Negligence of Servant. 228 (3) (U.S.C.C.A.Or.) Foreman, failing to comply with statutory duty as to safety devices, held not entitled to recover for injuries. -Marks v. Bauers, 3 F. (2d) 516. (H) Actions. 285 (2) (U.S.C.C.A.N.J.) Evidence of cause of freight conductor's death held insufficient for jury.-Smith v. Philadelphia & R. Ry. Co., 3 F.(2d) 604. 286(1) (U.S.C.C.A.Ala.) Railroad's negligence in failing to guard employee, shot during strike, held question for jury.-St. Louis-San Francisco Ry. Co. v. Mills, 3 F. (2d) 882. 286(3) (U.S.C.C.A.N.J.) Negligence in not providing safe appliances and place of work question for jury.-Standard Oil Co. of New Jersey v. De Vries, 3 F. (2d) 852. in II. CREATION, OPERATION, AND EFFECT. 286 (21) (U.S.C.C.A.N.J.) Negligence 30 (U.S.D.C.Mass.) Failure to inquire as to ownership of vessel held to defeat right to lien. The Susquehanna, 3 F. (2d) 1014. 31 (U.S.D.C.N.C.) Transferee of note acquired no lien where seller itself had no lien. -The Defiance, 3 F. (2d) 48. 37 (U.S.D.C.Me.) Lien cannot be enforced by part owner as against a stranger having a lien. The Frank Brainerd, 3 F. (2d.) 664. 37 (U.S.D.C.Md.) Assignee of freights held to have no lien and claim for supplies furnished ship on voyage in which freights were earned superior to claim of assignee.-In re Atlantic, Gulf & Pacific S. S. Co., 3 F. (2d) 311. 49 (U.S.D.C.Me.) Lien claimants held not entitled to challenge validity of attachment.The Frank Brainerd, 3 F. (2d) 664. em ployee, injuring coemployee, was acting_within scope of employment, held for jury.-List v. New York Cent. R. Co., 3 F. (2d) 434. MECHANICS' LIENS. II. RIGHT TO LIEN. 25 (U.S.C.C.A.Ark.) Oil tanks and fixtures held "erections and improvements" within statute.-American Tank Co. v. Continental & Commercial Trust & Savings Bank, 3 F. (2d) 122. III. PROCEEDINGS TO PERFECT. 118 (U.S.C.C.A.Ark.) Ten-day notice to owner before filing notice of lien not required of original contractor.-American Tank Co. v. & Indexes see same topic and KEY-NUMBER Continental & Commercial Trust & Savings Bank, 3 F. (2d) 122. 132(10) (U.S.C.C.A.Ark,) Lien filed within 90 days after last item of continuing contract held to cover all materials furnished.-American Tank Co. v. Continental & Commercial Trust & Savings Bank, 3 F. (2d) 122. VII. ENFORCEMENT. MONOPOLIES. II. TRUSTS AND OTHER COMBINATIONS 17(2) (U.S.C.C.A.Ohio) Discrimination in price to different purchasers not unlawful, unless it lessens competition or tends to create a monopoly.-S. S. Kresge Co. V. Champion Spark Plug Co., 3 F. (2d) 415. 260(4) (U.S.C.C.A.Ark.) Enforcement in federal court not defeated because lienholder did not commence suit in state court within statutory time.-American Tank Co. v. Continental & Commercial Trust & Savings Bank, See Chattel Mortgages. 3 F.(2d) 122. Discrimination in prices held not in violation of Clayton Act.-Id. 281(1) (U.S.C.C.A.Ark.) Evidence held to show that materials were furnished to specific leasehold estates, not on personal credit of See lessee.-American Tank Co. v. Continental & Commercial Trust & Savings Bank, 3 F. (2d) 122. 281 (2) (U.S.C.C.A.Ark.) Evidence held to show continuing agreement under which lien filed within 90 days after last item covered all material.-American Tank Co. v. Continental & Commercial Trust & Savings Bank, 3 F. (2d) 122. MILITARY LAW. See Army and Navy. MINES AND MINERALS. I. PUBLIC MINERAL LANDS. (A) Reservation and Disposal in General. 5 (U.S.C.C.A.Wyo.) Oil-leasing act held to permit leases only to holders of valid placer locations.-Richardson v. Western Oil, Coal & Investment Co., 3 F. (2d) 403. (B) Location and Acquisition of Claims. 27(4) (U.S.C.C.A.Wyo.) Contract between rival claimants contemplating lease from government held to entitle plaintiff to royalties only in lands to which it had a valid existing claim.-Richardson v. Western Oil, Coal & Investment Co., 3 F. (2d) 403. MORTGAGES. MUNICIPAL CORPORATIONS. XI. USE AND REGULATION OF PUBLIC 705 (10) (App.D.C.) Last clear chance doctrine held inapplicable to injuries to pedestrian by automobile.-Reaver v. Walch, 3 F. (2d) 204. 706(3) (App.D.C.) Pedestrian has burden of proving negligent operation of automobile.Reaver v. Walch, 3 F.(2d) 204. Res ipsa loquitur doctrine held inapplicable to pedestrian's injuries by automobile.-Id. 706(6) (App.D.C.) Evidence of negligence of driver of automobile, striking pedestrian, held insufficient for jury.-Reaver v. Walch, 3 F. (2d) 204. NATIONAL BANKS. 36 (U.S.C.C.A.Wyo.) Public oil lands can be acquired only by compliance with placer See Banks and Banking, 256-2882. mining laws.-Richardson v. Western Oil, Coal & Investment Co., 3 F. (2d) 403. (C) Patents. 43 (U.S.C.C.A.Wyo.) Patent held to cut off rights of claimants to oil lands.-Richardson v. Western Oil, Coal & Investment Co., 3 F. (2d) 403. II. TITLE, CONVEYANCES, AND CON- (C) Leases, Licenses, and Contracts. 79(1) (U.S.C.C.A.Tex.) Lessor held owner of that part of oil reserved as royalty, both before and after production.-W. T. Waggoner Estate v. Wichita County, 3 F. (2d) 962. 80 (U.S.C.C.A.La.) Oil lessee entitled to remove machinery and supplies on forfeiture of lease. In re Midland Oil Co., 3 F. (2d) 112. III. OPERATION OF MINES, QUARRIES, (A) Statutory and Official Regulations. 87 (U.S.C.C.A.W.Va.) Privilege tax for coal mining held to apply only to mining for sale or profit.-Norfolk & W. Ry. Co. v. Hall, 3 F.(2d) 254. NATURALIZATION. See Aliens, 62-69. NAVIGABLE WATERS. I. RIGHTS OF PUBLIC. 20(8) (U.S.D.C.Pa.) City held liable for negligent operation of drawbridge.-The Brimstone, 3 F. (2d) 1011. Duty of those maintaining drawbridge to see that draw is properly operated.-Id. II. LANDS UNDER WATER. 38 (U.S.D.C.Fla.) Title to land between high and low water mark under Florida statute construed.-Commodores Point Terminal Co. v. Hudnall, 3 F. (2d) 841. NEGLIGENCE. See Master and Servant, 101-287; Railroads, 307-328; Street Railroads, 98-117. I. ACTS OR OMISSIONS CONSTITUTING (A) Personal Conduct in General. (C) Condition and Use of Land, Buildings, and Other Structures. 52 (U.S.C.C.A.Ala.) Owner of premises engaging independent contractor to work thereon may incur duty to warn contractor's employees of dangers.-U. S. Cast Iron Pipe & Foundry Co. v. Sullivan, 3 F. (2d) 794. II. PROXIMATE CAUSE OF INJURY. 59 (U.S.C.C.A.Ala.) When negligence proximate cause of injury.-St. Louis-San Francisco Ry. Co. v. Mills, 3 F. (2d) 882. 62(1) (U.S.C.C.A.Ala.) Intervening cause which should have been foreseen will not relieve from liability.-St. Louis-San Francisco Ry. Co. v. Mills, 3 F. (2d) 882. ners. PATENTS. II. PATENTABILITY. (A) Invention. 16 (U.S.C.C.A.Colo.) Mere improvement, to secure better result by original method, not "invention."-Lehman v. Ripley, 3 F. (2d) 518. 17 (U.S.C.C.A.N.Y.) Claims for hair-waving device designed to apply borax to one portion of hair and protect another portion held not to embody invention.-E. Fredericks, Inc. v. Eugene, 3 F.(2d) 543. 20 (U.S.C.C.A.N.Y.) Mechanical change or alteration not invention.-E. Fredericks, Inc. v. Eugene, 3 F. (2d) 543. Transfer of idea of device from art of medicated plasters to art of permanent hair waiving held not invention.-Id. 35 (U.S.C.C.A.III.) Doubt as to invalidity must exist before evidence of commercial success warrants finding in favor of validity.U. S. Sanitary Specialties Corporation v. West Disinfecting Co., 3F. (2d) 997. 36 (U.S.C.C.A.Ohio) When sales are evidence of invention stated.-Wellman-SeaverMorgan Co. v. William Cramp & Sons Ship & Engine Bldg. Co., 3 F. (2d) 531. Commercial success has evidential force.-Id (D) Anticipation. ~66 (U.S.D.C.N.Y.) Effective date of British patent is date of sealing.-A. Schrader's Son, Inc., v. Wein Sales Corporation, 3 F. (2d) 999. Effective date of French patents is date of issue.-Id. Effective date of German patents is date of publication. Id. 72 (U.S.C.C.A.Ohio) When superficial similarities must be minimized in destructive effect on advance of great commercial value stated. -Wellman-Seaver-Morgan Co. V. William Cramp & Sons Ship & Engine Bldg. Co., 3 F. (2d) 531. 73 (U.S.D.C.N.Y.) Anticipation by foreign publications.-A. Schrader's Son. Inc., v. Wein Sales Corporation, 3 F. (2d) 999. (E) Prior Public Use or Sale. 75 (U.S.D.C.N.Y.) Experimental use of device does not bar patent; "public use."-A. Schrader's Son. Inc., v. Wein Sales Corporation, 3 F. (2d) 999. III. PERSONS ENTITLED TO PATENTS. 91(4) (App.D.C.) Affidavit of senior party in interference proceedings antedating activ ity on part of junior parties held disclosure of invention.-Taggart v. Shilstone, 3 F. (2d) 95. IV. APPLICATIONS AND PROCEEDINGS THEREON. 107 (App.D.C.) Nolan Act, relieving applicants for patents whose applications had become abandoned during war of burden of showing delay unavoidable, held within authority of Congress.-Seror v. Dick, 3 F.(2d) 92. Verified representation in application for patent that applicant was citizen of France held prima facie showing in interference proceeding that applicant was entitled to benefits of Nolan Act.-Id. 217(3) (U.S.C.C.A.Tenn.) Evidence held insufficient to show deed of trust was partnership indebtedness.-Meriweather-Graham-Oli-113(6) (App.D.C.) Jurisdiction of Court of ver Co. v. Bank of Commerce of Earle, Ark., 3 F. (2d) 513. VI. DEATH OF PARTNER, AND SURVIVING PARTNERS. 258(7) (App.D.C.) Failure of surviving partners to so designate themselves in complaint held not fatal.-Briesen v. A Certain Fund, 3 F. (2d) 509. Appeals in interference proceedings limited to determination of priority.-Taggart v. Shilstone, 3 F. (2d) 95. V. REQUISITES AND VALIDITY OF LETTERS PATENT. 120 (U.S.C.C.A.Or.) Patent issued after application filed for second patent is not in the prior art.-Cookingham v. Warren Bros. Co., 3 F. (2d) 899. For cases in Dec.Dig. & Am.Dig. Key-No.Series & Indexes see same topic and KEY-NUMBER 121 (U.S.C.C.A.Or.) Inventor may obtain separate patents, although standing in relation by way of genus and species.-Cookingham v. Warren Bros. Co., 3 F.(2d) 899. VII. REISSUES. 148 (U.S.C.C.A.III.) Surrender and reissue nullifies original patent, and forecloses right to recover damages for prior infringement.-Luminous Unit Co. v. Freeman-Sweet Co., 3 F. (2d) 577. IX. CONSTRUCTION AND OPERATION OF LETTERS PATENT. (B) Limitation of Claims. 165 (U.S.D.C.Mass.) Patent cannot be construed to cover wider field than indicated in specification.-Nash Engineering Co. v. W. D. Cashin & Co., 3 F. (2d) 686. 165 (U.S.D.C.Mont.) Patentee bound by his own construction of claims.-Greenawalt v. American Smelting & Refining Co., 3 F.(2d) 658. 167(1) (U.S.C.S.A.N.Y.) Specifications followed to determine meaning of terms.-E. Fredericks, Inc. v. Eugene, 3 F. (2d) 543. 172 (U.S.C.C.A.N.Y.) Patentee limited by claims which cannot have limitations read into them for purpose of avoiding anticipation.E. Fredericks, Inc. v. Eugene, 3 F. (2d) 543. 245 (U.S.D.C.Ohio) Interchangeability of parts standard test of infringement, lacking which presumption is against infringement.— Auto Hone Co. v. Hall Cylinder Hone Co., 3 F. (2d) 479. (C) Suits in Equity. 292 (U.S.D.C.Cal.) Defendants' denial of assignment to plaintiff held not to authorize interrogation of plaintiff as to other assignments. Miller & Pardee v. Lawrence A. Sweet Mfg. Co., 3 F. (2d) 198. Answers not sealed and deposited with court, unless by consent of parties.-Id. 297(4) (U.S.C.C.A.Pa.) Effect of decision of Court of Appeals of District of Columbia, determining priority of invention, stated. Rousso v. Barber, 3 F. (2d) 740. 297(8) (U.S.C.C.A.Pa.) Validity not established by consent decree.-Rousso v. Barber, 3 F. (2d) 740. Permitting plaintiff to withdraw suit without prejudice after issue joined held error.-E. Fredericks, Inc. v. Eugene, 3 F. (2d) 543. 313 (U.S.C.C.A.N.Y.) XIII. DECISIONS ON THE VALIDITY, CON- 328. 178 (U.S.C.C.A.Ohio) Claim limitation pertaining only to accessory may be minimized, where liberal rule of equivalency justified.— Wellman-Seaver-Morgan Co. v. William Cramp & Sons Ship & Engine Bldg. Co., 3 F. (2d) 531. 178 (U.S.D.C.N.Y.) Patentee cannot claim as equivalent something claimed and rejected. 927,298. Lewis v. Merritt, Chapman & Scott Corporation, 3 F. (2d) 66. con UNITED STATES. ORIGINAL. 727,505. Street pavement, held not anticipat- 178 (U.S.D.C.Ohio) Not entitled to X. TITLE, CONVEYANCES, AND CON- (C) Licenses and Contracts. 214 (U.S.D.C.N.Y.) Nonpayment of royalty under license agreement showing intent not to practice invention entitles licensor to cancellation of license.-Hazeltine Research Corporation v. Freed-Eisemann Radio Corporation, 3 F. (2d) 172. 1,030,890. Hydraulic valve, held not antici- 1,152,326. Apparatus for laying submarine 1,157,046. 1,164,815. 1,168,945. 1,180,799. Delay in payment of royalty pending negotiations for annual lump sum royalty held not repudiation of license agreement.-Id. Acceptance of overdue royalties waived for- 1,193,884. feiture of license agreement.-Id. Burden on plaintiff to prove that sublicense contract should be canceled.-Id. Clear and satisfactory proof required to show forfeiture or repudiation of contract.-Id. Court should consider whether, under facts, cancellation of license contract would be unjust and inequitable.-Id. 1,237,717. 1,304,534. 219(1) (U.S.D.C.N.Y.) Courts of law have 1,313,232. exclusive jurisdiction, where issue solely nonpayment of royalty under license contract.Hazeltine Research Corporation Eisemann Radio Corporation, 3 F. (2d) 172. XII. INFRINGEMENT. 1,348,407. claim 4, held not infringed (C. C. Spark plug, claims 1, 3, and 6, held ders, claim 5, held void; claim 6 V. Freed- 1,346,337. Deodorizing material, claim 2, held (A) What Constitutes Infringement. 226 (U.S.D.C.Cal.) Adoption of patentee's preferred methods not essential to "infringement."-Casey v. Bennett, 3 F. (2d) 640. 236 (U.S.D.C.Cal.) Change of form, though 1,355,283. an improvement, will not avoid infringement. Casey v. Bennett, 3 F. (2d) 640. |