 | American Bar Association. Section of Antitrust Law - 1982 - 430 lapas
...case. Proof beyond a reasonable doubt, therefore, is proof of such a convincing character that you would be willing to rely and act upon it without hesitation in the most important of your own affairs. If you are convinced that an accused has been proved guilty beyond reasonable doubt,... | |
 | Ralph Slovenko - 1995 - 454 lapas
...Criminal Appeals in 1991 defined reasonable doubt as "proof of such a convincing character that you would be willing to rely and act upon it without hesitation in the most important of your own affairs." AS Hayes & S. McMuray, "Court Defines 'Reasonable Doubt,' To Dismay of Some Texas... | |
 | Ken Anderson - 1997 - 212 lapas
...affairs. Proof beyond a reasonable doubt, therefore, must be proof of such a convincing character that you would be willing to rely and act upon it without hesitation in the most important of your own affairs." the type of clothes worn, and why the crime was committed—do not have to be proved.... | |
 | Ron Morris, Ron N. Morris - 2000 - 264 lapas
...case. "Proof beyond a reasonable doubt, therefore, is proof of such a convincing character that you would be willing to rely and act upon it without hesitation in the most important of your affairs. However, it does not mean an absolute certainty" (Lectric, "Reasonable Doubt"). In a... | |
 | Cynthia L. Cates, Wayne V. McIntosh - 2001 - 264 lapas
...case. Proof beyond a reasonable doubt, therefore, is proof of such a convincing character that you would be willing to rely and act upon it without hesitation in the most important of your own affairs. However, it does not mean an absolute certainty" (The 'Lectric Law Lexicon, a service... | |
 | Patricia Springer - 2002 - 372 lapas
...affairs. Proof beyond a reasonable doubt, therefore, must be proof of such a convincing character that you would be willing to rely and act upon it without hesitation in the most important of your own affairs," Sudderth told the jury. He then reminded them that if they had a reasonable doubt,... | |
 | S. L. Alexander - 2003 - 188 lapas
...defendant is guilty. Some further define this standard as proof of such a convincing nature that you would be willing to rely and act upon it without hesitation in the most important of your own affairs. After instructing the jury, the judge will send jurors to a separate room to deliberate:... | |
 | Cornelia M. Ashby (au) - 2005 - 88 lapas
...convincing evidence, a lower standard than required by lCWA. Source: Pub. L No. 95-608. Title lV-E of the Social Security Act. and state laws. Note:...firm belief that the allegation in question is true. ICWA also authorizes grant funding to American Indian tribes for operating child and family service... | |
 | Terence Anderson, David Schum, William Twining - 2005 - 437 lapas
...case. Proof beyond a reasonable doubt, therefore, is proof of such a convincing character that you would be willing to rely and act upon it without hesitation in the most important of your own affairs. If you are convinced that the accused has been proved guilty beyond reasonable doubt,... | |
 | James Spade - 2006 - 340 lapas
...case. Proof beyond a reasonable doubt, therefore, is proof of such a convincing character that you would be willing to rely and act upon it without hesitation in the most important of your own affairs. However, a greater number of witnesses or a greater length of time taken by either... | |
| |
Proof beyond a reasonable doubt, therefore, is proof of such a convincing character that you would be willing to rely and act upon it without hesitation in the most important of your own affairs. 
