 | 1884 - 1902 lapas
...91 US 150, 157 : "It is no new invention to use an old machine for a new purpose. The inventor of a machine is entitled to the benefit of all the uses to which it can be put, no matter whether he had cancel red the idea of the use or not." See, also, Stowe v. City of Chicago, 21 0. G. 790. The sixth... | |
 | 1881 - 1014 lapas
...improvements, each of which is or may be auxiliary to produce the same general result. The invenior of a machine is entitled to the benefit of all the uses to which it can be put, no matter whether he conceived the idea of the use or not. An "improved driving gearing," included in the specification... | |
 | 1881 - 982 lapas
...improvements, each of which is or may be auxiliary to produce the same general result. The inventor of a machine is entitled to the benefit of all the uses to which it can be put, no mutter whether he conceived the idea of the use or not. An "improved driving gearing," included in... | |
 | Hubert Ashley Banning, United States. Circuit Courts - 1883 - 730 lapas
...157, it is said: " It is no new invention to use an old machine for a new purpose. The inventor of a machine is entitled to the benefit of all the uses...true, it may be said, that the several parts which make up complainants' mechanism are old, but, as is stated by the court in Strong v. Noble, 3 Fisher,... | |
 | United States. Supreme Court - 1885 - 1072 lapas
...a new invention. It is no new invention to use an old machine for a new purpose. The inventor of a machine is entitled to the benefit of all the uses...whether he had conceived the idea of the use or not. Lyman had the descending current. True, he concentrated the air as it fell, and sent it downwards through... | |
 | United States. Supreme Court - 1889 - 684 lapas
...LoniNO, WILLIAM STRONG. Argument of counsel. Mr. Arthur ». Briesen, for appellant : The inventor of a machine is entitled to the benefit of all the uses...whether he had conceived the idea of the use or not. Smith v. Nichols, 21 Wall. 112 [9 Am. & Eng. 425 ;] Roberts v. Ryer, 91 US 150 [10 Am. & Eng. 302;]... | |
 | United States. Supreme Court - 1892 - 760 lapas
...no new invention to use an old machine for a new purpose. The inventor of a machine is entitled to all the uses to which it can be put, no matter whether he had conceived the idea of the use or not." In Pennsylvania Railway v. Locomotive Truck Co., 110 US 490, 494, the adoption of a truck for locomotives... | |
 | United States. Supreme Court - 1892 - 1132 lapas
...is no new invention louse an old machine for a new purpose. The inventor of a machine is entitled to all the uses to which it can be put, no matter whether he had conceived the idea of tbe use or not." In I'fiinaylrania It. Co. v. Locomo/iec EngineA A T.(.'o., 110 US 490, 494 (28: 223,... | |
| |
Roberts v. Ryer, 91 US 150, 157, that "it is no new invention to use an old machine for a new purpose. The inventor of a machine is entitled to all the uses to which it can be put, no matter whether he had conceived the idea of the use or not. 
