Decisions of the Commissioner of Patents and of the United States Courts in Patent and Trade-mark and Copyright CasesU.S. Government Printing Office, 1880 "Compiled from Official gazette. Beginning with 1876, the volumes have included also decisions of United States courts, decisions of Secretary of Interior, opinions of Attorney-General, and important decisions of state courts in relation to patents, trade-marks, etc. 1869-94, not in Congressional set." Checklist of U. S. public documents, 1789-1909, p. 530. |
No grāmatas satura
1.5. rezultāts no 100.
8. lappuse
... evidence of abandonment ; but neglect to confer the benefits of the in- vention upon the public , whether it is or is not accompanied by neglect to apply for a patent , is evidence of abandonment . The inventor may voluntarily keep his ...
... evidence of abandonment ; but neglect to confer the benefits of the in- vention upon the public , whether it is or is not accompanied by neglect to apply for a patent , is evidence of abandonment . The inventor may voluntarily keep his ...
12. lappuse
... evidence that the invention was made by the applicant as early as the date of his application , it affords no presumptive evidence that it was not made at an earlier date , nor that the applicant will not be able to establish an earlier ...
... evidence that the invention was made by the applicant as early as the date of his application , it affords no presumptive evidence that it was not made at an earlier date , nor that the applicant will not be able to establish an earlier ...
16. lappuse
United States. Patent Office. no presumptive evidence that it was not made at an earlier date , nor that the applicant will not be able to establish an earlier date in the Patent Office ; and , in the absence of any evidence to the ...
United States. Patent Office. no presumptive evidence that it was not made at an earlier date , nor that the applicant will not be able to establish an earlier date in the Patent Office ; and , in the absence of any evidence to the ...
36. lappuse
... evidence in favor of the affiant against another party to an interference ; for the express provision of the rule authorizing such preliminary statement is that it can in no case be used as evidence in behalf of the party making it . 5 ...
... evidence in favor of the affiant against another party to an interference ; for the express provision of the rule authorizing such preliminary statement is that it can in no case be used as evidence in behalf of the party making it . 5 ...
39. lappuse
... evidence now adduced on behalf of Fowler & Lewis may be used on behalf of said Fowler & Lewis at any future motion to dissolve the interference as redeclared upon the amended issue asked for by Benton under date of November 20 , 1879 ...
... evidence now adduced on behalf of Fowler & Lewis may be used on behalf of said Fowler & Lewis at any future motion to dissolve the interference as redeclared upon the amended issue asked for by Benton under date of November 20 , 1879 ...
Citi izdevumi - Skatīt visu
Bieži izmantoti vārdi un frāzes
abandoned Acting Commissioner affidavit alleged amendment apparatus appeal application assignment August 27 band bill buckle cast-iron combination complainant complainant's connected consists construction court cover decarburization Decided decision decree defendant device disclaimer dissolve drawing effect embraced English patent entitled evidence Examiner of Interferences Examiners-in-Chief fact February February 21 filed flange foreign patent held Holbeck improvement infringement injunction interference proceeding inventor issue January jointer letters patent machine Manufacturing Company matter mechanism ment Messrs metal motion nitro-glycerine objection operation original patent party patent granted Patent Office plaintiff Primary Examiner prior produced proof purpose question reduction to practice reference rehearing reissue application reissued patent rejected result Revised Statutes Rule second claim secured shown Siemens-Martin process specific claim spring subject-matter substance substantially as described suit tappet testimony tion trade-mark United States Circuit valid vulcanite wire words
Populāri fragmenti
57. lappuse - ... and not patented or described in any printed publication in this or any foreign country, before his invention or discovery thereof, and not in public use or on sale in this country for more than two years prior to his application, unless the same is proved to have been abandoned, may, upon payment of the fees required by law, and other due proceedings had, obtain a patent therefor.
445. lappuse - ... or more than two years prior to his application, and not in public use or on sale in this country for more than two years...
307. lappuse - The several courts vested with jurisdiction of cases arising under the patent laws shall have power to grant injunctions according to the course and principles of courts of equity, to prevent the violation of any right secured by patent, on such terms as the court may deem reasonable...
460. lappuse - States, or resident therein, who shall be the author, inventor, designer, or proprietor of any book, map, chart, dramatic or musical composition, engraving, cut, print, or photograph or negative thereof, or of a painting, drawing, chromo, statue, statuary, and of models or designs intended to be perfected as works of the fine arts...
466. lappuse - No one can claim protection for the exclusive use of a trade-mark or trade-name which would practically give him a monopoly in the sale of any goods other than those produced or made by himself. If he could, the public would be injured rather than protected, for competition would be destroyed. Nor can a generic name, or a name merely descriptive of an article of trade, of its qualities, ingredients or characteristics, be employed as a trade-mark and the exclusive use of it be entitled to legal protection.
425. lappuse - And where the art it teaches cannot be used without employing the methods and diagrams used to illustrate the book, or such as are similar to them, such methods and diagrams are to be considered as necessary incidents to the art, and given therewith to the public; not given for the purpose of publication in other works explanatory of the art, but for the purpose of practical application.
341. lappuse - Roberts v. Ryer, 91 US 150, 157, that "it is no new invention to use an old machine for a new purpose. The inventor of a machine is entitled to all the uses to which it can be put, no matter whether he had conceived the idea of the use or not.
374. lappuse - That every patent shall be assignable in law, either as to the whole interest, or any undivided part thereof, by any instrument in writing ; which assignment, and also every grant and conveyance of the exclusive right under any patent, to make and use, and to grant to others to make and use, the thing patented within and throughout any specified part or portion of the United States, shall be recorded in the Patent Office within three months from the execution thereof, for which the assignee or grantee...
295. lappuse - No person shall be debarred from receiving a patent for his invention or discovery, nor shall any patent be declared invalid, by reason of its having been first patented or caused to be patented in a foreign country...
183. lappuse - Office, to any person who has invented or discovered any new and useful art, machine, manufacture or composition of matter...