Decisions of the Commissioner of Patents and of the United States Courts in Patent and Trade-mark and Copyright CasesU.S. Government Printing Office, 1880 "Compiled from Official gazette. Beginning with 1876, the volumes have included also decisions of United States courts, decisions of Secretary of Interior, opinions of Attorney-General, and important decisions of state courts in relation to patents, trade-marks, etc. 1869-94, not in Congressional set." Checklist of U. S. public documents, 1789-1909, p. 530. |
No grāmatas satura
1.–5. rezultāts no 100.
vi. lappuse
... Company Allen v . City of New York . Allis et al . v . Stowell 604 481 611 American Cotton Tie Supply Company v . Bullard et al 273 American Cotton Tie Supply Company v . McCready et al ... 299 American Paper Collar Company , Goldsmith ...
... Company Allen v . City of New York . Allis et al . v . Stowell 604 481 611 American Cotton Tie Supply Company v . Bullard et al 273 American Cotton Tie Supply Company v . McCready et al ... 299 American Paper Collar Company , Goldsmith ...
vii. lappuse
... Company v . 273 Burton v . Town of Greenville ... 602 Bussey et al . v . Excelsior Manufacturing Company 362 C. California Vigorit Powder Company et al . , Giant Powder Company v 680 Campbell v . James et al ..... 587 Campbell v . James ...
... Company v . 273 Burton v . Town of Greenville ... 602 Bussey et al . v . Excelsior Manufacturing Company 362 C. California Vigorit Powder Company et al . , Giant Powder Company v 680 Campbell v . James et al ..... 587 Campbell v . James ...
viii. lappuse
... Company , Henry v .... Franz & Pope Knitting Machine Company v . Bickford ... G. Gale Manufacturing Company v . Prutzman et al . Giant Powder Company v . California Vigorit Powder Company et al ...... Gilbert & Barker Manufacturing Company ...
... Company , Henry v .... Franz & Pope Knitting Machine Company v . Bickford ... G. Gale Manufacturing Company v . Prutzman et al . Giant Powder Company v . California Vigorit Powder Company et al ...... Gilbert & Barker Manufacturing Company ...
ix. lappuse
... Company v 507 Kingsbury et al . , Hamilton v .... 246 Kingsbury et al . , Hamilton v .. Kirby Bung Manufacturing Company v . White et al .... 373 418 Knapp , Irish v .... Kneeland et al . v . Sheriff et al 624 583 L. Lake Shore ...
... Company v 507 Kingsbury et al . , Hamilton v .... 246 Kingsbury et al . , Hamilton v .. Kirby Bung Manufacturing Company v . White et al .... 373 418 Knapp , Irish v .... Kneeland et al . v . Sheriff et al 624 583 L. Lake Shore ...
x. lappuse
... Company v . Holmes Burglar Alarm Telegraph Company Parks et al . v . Booth .. Parmenter , Crowell v Pawling et al . , Maynard v . Pearce v . Mulford et al ..... Peck , Stow & Wilcox Company v . Lindsay , Sterritt & Co ... Perkins v ...
... Company v . Holmes Burglar Alarm Telegraph Company Parks et al . v . Booth .. Parmenter , Crowell v Pawling et al . , Maynard v . Pearce v . Mulford et al ..... Peck , Stow & Wilcox Company v . Lindsay , Sterritt & Co ... Perkins v ...
Citi izdevumi - Skatīt visu
Bieži izmantoti vārdi un frāzes
abandoned Acting Commissioner affidavit alleged amendment apparatus appeal application assignment August 27 band bill buckle cast-iron combination complainant complainant's connected consists construction court courts of equity cover decarburization Decided decision decree defendant device disclaimer dissolve drawing effect embraced English patent entitled evidence Examiner of Interferences Examiners-in-Chief fact February February 21 filed flange foreign patent held Holbeck improvement infringement injunction interference proceeding inventor issue January jointer letters patent machine matter mechanism ment Messrs metal motion nitro-glycerine objection operation original patent parties patent granted Patent Office plaintiff Primary Examiner prior produced proof purpose question reduction to practice reference rehearing reissue application reissued patent rejected result Revised Statutes Rule second claim secured shown Siemens-Martin process specific claim spring subject-matter substance substantially as described suit tappet testimony tion trade-mark United States Circuit valid wire words
Populāri fragmenti
57. lappuse - ... and not patented or described in any printed publication in this or any foreign country, before his invention or discovery thereof, and not in public use or on sale in this country for more than two years prior to his application, unless the same is proved to have been abandoned, may, upon payment of the fees required by law, and other due proceedings had, obtain a patent therefor.
445. lappuse - ... or more than two years prior to his application, and not in public use or on sale in this country for more than two years...
307. lappuse - The several courts vested with jurisdiction of cases arising under the patent laws shall have power to grant injunctions according to the course and principles of courts of equity, to prevent the violation of any right secured by patent, on such terms as the court may deem reasonable...
460. lappuse - States, or resident therein, who shall be the author, inventor, designer, or proprietor of any book, map, chart, dramatic or musical composition, engraving, cut, print, or photograph or negative thereof, or of a painting, drawing, chromo, statue, statuary, and of models or designs intended to be perfected as works of the fine arts...
466. lappuse - No one can claim protection for the exclusive use of a trade-mark or trade-name which would practically give him a monopoly in the sale of any goods other than those produced or made by himself. If he could, the public would be injured rather than protected, for competition would be destroyed. Nor can a generic name, or a name merely descriptive of an article of trade, of its qualities, ingredients or characteristics, be employed as a trade-mark and the exclusive use of it be entitled to legal protection.
425. lappuse - And where the art it teaches cannot be used without employing the methods and diagrams used to illustrate the book, or such as are similar to them, such methods and diagrams are to be considered as necessary incidents to the art, and given therewith to the public; not given for the purpose of publication in other works explanatory of the art, but for the purpose of practical application.
341. lappuse - Roberts v. Ryer, 91 US 150, 157, that "it is no new invention to use an old machine for a new purpose. The inventor of a machine is entitled to all the uses to which it can be put, no matter whether he had conceived the idea of the use or not.
374. lappuse - That every patent shall be assignable in law, either as to the whole interest, or any undivided part thereof, by any instrument in writing ; which assignment, and also every grant and conveyance of the exclusive right under any patent, to make and use, and to grant to others to make and use, the thing patented within and throughout any specified part or portion of the United States, shall be recorded in the Patent Office within three months from the execution thereof, for which the assignee or grantee...
295. lappuse - No person shall be debarred from receiving a patent for his invention or discovery, nor shall any patent be declared invalid, by reason of its having been first patented or caused to be patented in a foreign country...
183. lappuse - Office, to any person who has invented or discovered any new and useful art, machine, manufacture or composition of matter...