 | Great Britain. Court of King's Bench, Charles Durnford, Sir Edward Hyde East - 1817 - 946 lapas
...nevertheless warrant him, still die master would be liable on the warranty, because the servant was acting within the general scope of his authority, and the public cannot be supposed to be cognizant of any private conversation between the master and servant (a) : but if the owner of... | |
 | George Long - 1821 - 294 lapas
...nevertheless warrant him, still the master would be liable on the warranty, because the servant was acting within the general scope of his authority, and the public cannot be supposed to be Cognizant of any private conversation between the master and servant ; but if the owner of a... | |
 | Samuel Comyn - 1824 - 680 lapas
...do nevertheless warrant him, still the master will be liable on the warranty, because his servant is acting within the general scope of his authority, and the public cannot be supposed cognizant of any private conversation between the master and the servant: but if the owner of a horse... | |
 | James Kent - 1827 - 544 lapas
...warrant, the master is held to be bound, because the servant, having a general authority to sell, acted within the general scope of his authority, and the public cannot be supposed to be acquaintpd with, the private conversations between the master and a Munn v. Commission Company.... | |
 | Charles Petersdorff - 1831 - 590 lapas
...nevertheless warrant him, still the master would be liable on the warranty, because the servant was acting within the general scope of his authority, and the public cannot he supposed to be cognizant of any private conversation between the master and the servant ; Fenn v.... | |
 | 1855 - 980 lapas
...nevertheless warrant him, still the master would be liable on the warranty, because the servant was acting within the general scope of his authority, and the public cannot be supposed to be cognizant of any private conversation between the master and servant; but if the owner of the... | |
 | Joseph Chitty - 1834 - 850 lapas
...servant not to warrant him, still the master would be liable on the warranty, because the servant was acting within the general scope of his authority; and the public cannot be supposed to be cognizant of any private conversation between the master and servant. But if the owner of a horse... | |
 | South Carolina. Court of Appeals, William Randolph Hill - 1834 - 498 lapas
...nevertheless warrant him, still the master would be liable on the warranty, because the servant was acting in the general scope of his authority, and the public cannot be supposed to be cognizant of any private conversation between the master and servant: but if the owner of a horse... | |
 | William Selwyn - 1842 - 822 lapas
...does nevertheless warrant him, still the master is liable on the warranty, because the servant was acting within the general scope of his authority, and the public cannot be supposed to be cognizant of any private conversation between the master and servant : but if the owner of a... | |
 | Matthew Bacon, Sir Henry Gwilliam, Charles Edward Dodd - 1846 - 890 lapas
...does, nevertheless, warrant him, still the master will be liable on warranty, because the servant was acting within the general scope of his authority, and the public cannot be supposed cognisant of any private conversation between the master and the servant; but if the owner of a horse... | |
| |
... be liable on the warranty, because the servant was acting within the general scope of his authority, and the public cannot be supposed to be cognizant of any private conversation between the master and... 
