Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals Reorganization Act of 2001: Hearing Before the Subcommittee on Courts, the Internet, and Intellectual Property of the Committee on the Judiciary, House of Representatives, One Hundred Seventh Congress, Second Session, on H.R. 1203, July 23, 2002, 4. sējums

Pirmais vāks
 

Citi izdevumi - Skatīt visu

Bieži izmantoti vārdi un frāzes

Populāri fragmenti

92. lappuse - There is of course nothing in the decision reached here that is inconsistent with the fact that school children and others are officially encouraged to express love for our country by reciting historical documents such as the Declaration of Independence which contain references to the Deity or by singing officially espoused anthems which include the composer's professions of faith in a Supreme Being, or with the fact that there are many manifestations in our public life of belief in God.
92. lappuse - I am at a loss to understand the Court's unsupported ipse dixit that these official expressions of religious faith in and reliance upon a Supreme Being "bear no true resemblance to the unquestioned religious exercise that the State of New York has sponsored in this instance.
89. lappuse - Restructuring Justice: The Innovations of the Ninth Circuit and the Future of the Federal Courts (Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1990), p.
37. lappuse - Thank you, Mr. Chairman, for allowing me to appear before you today. I would be happy to answer any questions you may have. APPENDIX Exhibit 1 - Current Regional Circuits Exhibit 2 - Circuits After Restructuring Proposed by HR 2723 Exhibit 3 - All Ninth Circuit Judges by Seniority Exhibit 4 - Judges for the "New...
91. lappuse - Establishment Clause of the First Amendment to the United States Constitution...
8. lappuse - I thank you for the opportunity to be here this afternoon. My name is Mary M.
19. lappuse - Regarding the Ninth Circuit and S. 253. the Ninth Circuit Reorganization Act (July 16, 1999); Statement of Diarmuid F. O'Scannlain, Hearing Before the Committee on the Judiciary, United States House of Representatives, Oversight Hearing on the Final Report of the Commission on Structural Alternatives for the Federal Courts of Appeals (July 22, 1999); Diarmuid F. O'Scannlain. Should the Ninth Circuit be Saved?. 15 JL & Pol. 415 (1999); Diarmuid F. O'Scannlain. A Ninth Circuit Split Commission: Now...
23. lappuse - I and 2, pages 23-24, it is a remarkable array of judge power— more judges on one court than the entire federal judiciary when the circuit courts of appeals were created. With every additional judge that takes senior status, we grow even larger. Indeed, if we get the five new judgeships that Judge Rymer mentioned we have asked for, there will be 52 judges on the circuit, while the average size of all other circuits today is 14 active judges.7...
16. lappuse - I hi' natural evolution of the federal appellate court structure responding to population changes. As courts grow too big, they evolve into more manageable judicial units.
22. lappuse - ... am mystified by the relentless refusal of some of my colleagues," to contemplate the inevitable. As loyal as I am to my own circuit, I cannot oppose the logical evolution of our judicial structure as we grow to colossus size. The problem with the Ninth Circuit can be stated quite simply: we are too big now, and getting bigger every day. This is so whether you measure size in terms of number of judges, caseload, or population. Even though we are officially See, eg. Ninth Circuit in "Very Good"...

Bibliogrāfiskā informācija