United States Supreme Court Reports, 94. sējumsLawyers Co-operative Publishing Company, 1989 First series, books 1-43, includes "Notes on U.S. reports" by Walter Malins Rose. |
No grāmatas satura
1.–3. rezultāts no 86.
293. lappuse
... Supra Open but not neutroSophic Supra Open. Theorem 2.2. Every neutrosophic O-supra open set is neutrosophic semi-supra open. Proof. Let A be a neutrosophic o-supra open set in (X, T). Then, A C s-Nint(s-Ncl(s- Nint(A))). It is obvious ...
... Supra Open but not neutroSophic Supra Open. Theorem 2.2. Every neutrosophic O-supra open set is neutrosophic semi-supra open. Proof. Let A be a neutrosophic o-supra open set in (X, T). Then, A C s-Nint(s-Ncl(s- Nint(A))). It is obvious ...
86. lappuse
... supra topological spaces and also establish its properties . Definition 4.1 . A subcollection T * of neutrosophic sets on a non empty set X is said to be a neutrosophic supra topology on X if the sets 0 , X ET and U ; - A ; ETA , for ...
... supra topological spaces and also establish its properties . Definition 4.1 . A subcollection T * of neutrosophic sets on a non empty set X is said to be a neutrosophic supra topology on X if the sets 0 , X ET and U ; - A ; ETA , for ...
389. lappuse
... Supra topology on X. Then the neutrosophic supra topology O on Y is defined as follows: a = {0 ov, 1 ov, C, D, CUD}. Define a mapping f(X, T) — (Y, o] by f(a) = u and f(b) = v. The inverse image of the Open set in Y is not an ...
... Supra topology on X. Then the neutrosophic supra topology O on Y is defined as follows: a = {0 ov, 1 ov, C, D, CUD}. Define a mapping f(X, T) — (Y, o] by f(a) = u and f(b) = v. The inverse image of the Open set in Y is not an ...
Saturs
Personnel of Supreme Court | ix |
Reference Table of Vol 480 US pages 1end | xxxv |
Cases Reported in Vol 480 US | 1 |
Autortiesības | |
2 citas sadaļas nav parādītas.
Citi izdevumi - Skatīt visu
Bieži izmantoti vārdi un frāzes
16 USCS 28 USCS 42 USCS 94 L Ed 96 S Ct action affirmative Agency amicus curiae application attorney authority barn Blackmun Brennan California Circuit denied claim Clause coal Coastal concurring Confrontation Clause Congress constitutional County Court of Appeals creditors criminal debtor decision defendant discrimination dissenting District Court employees evidence exclusionary rule February 23 federal Fifth Amendment filed Fourth Amendment granted Indian interest issue judgment jurisdiction jury Justice L Ed 2d land legislative March 9 ment motion notice officers Ohio opinion party permit person Peti Petition for writ Petitioner v United plaintiff police Powell procedure promotion protection pursuant reasonable regulations remanded remedy respondent Rule Scalia Stat statement statute Supp supra Supreme Court tion tioner trial tribal courts trustee United States 479 United States Court United States trustee USCS violation warrant witness writ of certiorari