Patent Law Revision: Hearings, Ninety-third Congress, First Session, Pursuant to S. Res. 56, on S. 1321U.S. Government Printing Office, 1974 - 715 lappuses |
No grāmatas satura
1.–5. rezultāts no 100.
13. lappuse
... disclosed or described as set forth in section 102 of this title , if the differences between the subject matter sought to be ... disclosure or description for the purposes of sections 102 and 103 of this chapter , any description of any ...
... disclosed or described as set forth in section 102 of this title , if the differences between the subject matter sought to be ... disclosure or description for the purposes of sections 102 and 103 of this chapter , any description of any ...
17. lappuse
... disclosed in an application previously filed in a foreign country , he shall , subject to the provisions of this section , be entitled to such earlier foreign filing date , if— " ( 1 ) such foreign application was filed by the applicant ...
... disclosed in an application previously filed in a foreign country , he shall , subject to the provisions of this section , be entitled to such earlier foreign filing date , if— " ( 1 ) such foreign application was filed by the applicant ...
18. lappuse
... disclosed in an application previously filed in the United States , he shall , subject to the provisions of section 104 of this title , be entitled to the benefit of such earlier filing date , if— " ( 1 ) the subject matter common to ...
... disclosed in an application previously filed in the United States , he shall , subject to the provisions of section 104 of this title , be entitled to the benefit of such earlier filing date , if— " ( 1 ) the subject matter common to ...
19. lappuse
... disclosure of which is necessary to make the application as a whole not misleading ; and " ( 2 ) an explanation as to why the claims in such application are patentable over such matter . The applicant shall , if he considered no ...
... disclosure of which is necessary to make the application as a whole not misleading ; and " ( 2 ) an explanation as to why the claims in such application are patentable over such matter . The applicant shall , if he considered no ...
20. lappuse
... disclosure of the invention . Whenever any change is made in the disclosure , the burden shall be on the applicant to persuade the Office that the matter is not new . " ( e ) The applicant may present amended or new claims for ...
... disclosure of the invention . Whenever any change is made in the disclosure , the burden shall be on the applicant to persuade the Office that the matter is not new . " ( e ) The applicant may present amended or new claims for ...
Citi izdevumi - Skatīt visu
Bieži izmantoti vārdi un frāzes
absorption spectrum acid action adversary proceedings application for patent aqueous solution attorney Board of Appeals BRENNAN Calc'd carbon Chairman claim Commissioner of Patents committee compound Congress Corp Corporation Court cubic diamond deferred examination system Department of Commerce disclosure Dm w/p E.D. Mich effect filing date Found percent grant graphite hydrated independent agency Industries infringement invalid invention inventor issuance July June June 11 June 27 legislation license Litigation maintenance fees mixture N.D. III obtain opposition proceedings patent applications Patent Counsel patent examiners Patent Law patent system patents issued person President pressure primary examiner prior art procedure proposed Public Counsel salt Secretary Senator HART Sept Subcommittee subject matter temperature thereof tion trademark U.S. Patent Office United States Code USPQ Aff validity wo/p