Report on the Robinson-Patman ActDepartment of Justice, 1977 - 320 lappuses |
No grāmatas satura
1.5. rezultāts no 51.
19. lappuse
... what costs will be deemed material to the 28 / ADVISORY COMMITTEE TO THE FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION , REPORT ON COST JUSTIFICATION ( 1956 ) . 29 / 370 U.S. 460 ( 1962 ) . granting of a discount to a particular purchaser . It 19.
... what costs will be deemed material to the 28 / ADVISORY COMMITTEE TO THE FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION , REPORT ON COST JUSTIFICATION ( 1956 ) . 29 / 370 U.S. 460 ( 1962 ) . granting of a discount to a particular purchaser . It 19.
20. lappuse
United States. Department of Justice. granting of a discount to a particular purchaser . It has been held , for example , that the cost savings associated with billing large sales to mass purchasers may not be significant enough to ...
United States. Department of Justice. granting of a discount to a particular purchaser . It has been held , for example , that the cost savings associated with billing large sales to mass purchasers may not be significant enough to ...
21. lappuse
... but the result of such study must prove 33 / 76 F.T.C. 719 ( 1969 ) , aff'd sub nom . Kroger Co. v . FTC , 438 F.2d 1372 ( 6th Cir . ) cert . denied 404 U.S. 871 ( 1971 ) . that the cost savings associated with dealing with a particular 21.
... but the result of such study must prove 33 / 76 F.T.C. 719 ( 1969 ) , aff'd sub nom . Kroger Co. v . FTC , 438 F.2d 1372 ( 6th Cir . ) cert . denied 404 U.S. 871 ( 1971 ) . that the cost savings associated with dealing with a particular 21.
22. lappuse
... particular customer account for nearly all of the discount granted the customer . The FTC purports to apply a de minimis rule , which holds that if the cost justified differential and the actual differential contested are so close that ...
... particular customer account for nearly all of the discount granted the customer . The FTC purports to apply a de minimis rule , which holds that if the cost justified differential and the actual differential contested are so close that ...
32. lappuse
... particular price received was unlawful . After Automatic Canteen , buyers have been found liable under Section 2 ( f ) where the FTC showed , for example , that the buyer knew or should have known that the seller's discounts were not ...
... particular price received was unlawful . After Automatic Canteen , buyers have been found liable under Section 2 ( f ) where the FTC showed , for example , that the buyer knew or should have known that the seller's discounts were not ...
Citi izdevumi - Skatīt visu
Bieži izmantoti vārdi un frāzes
1817 LIBRARIES Act's actual advertising allowance anticompetitive antitrust laws Associated Wholesale Grocers Attorney backhaul benefit brokerage buyer buying cert chain stores charged Clayton Act Committee commodity competing competitors Cong consumer cooperative cost justification Court customers DCRG Hearings dealers discount distribution drug economic effect efficient eliminate enforcement establishment fair trade favored Federal Trade Commission firms Fred Meyer function higher prices impact independent industry injury to competition legislation low price lower prices manufacturer margin meeting competition defense merchandise MICHIGAN monopoly oligopolistic oligopoly operation Patman percent predation predatory pricing price competition price cutting price discrimination price reductions profits prohibit protect purchasers reduce regulatory repeal Report result Review Group Robinson Robinson-Patman Act secondary line Section 2(a seller selling Sess Sherman Act small business small businessmen small retailers smaller statute Subcommittee Hearings suppliers supra note Testimony tion unlawful Utah Pie violation wholesalers
Populāri fragmenti
272. lappuse - That it shall be unlawful for any person engaged in commerce, in the course of such commerce, either directly or indirectly, to discriminate in price between different purchasers of commodities of like grade and quality...
275. lappuse - ... elsewhere in the United States for the purpose of destroying competition or eliminating a competitor in such part of the United States; or, to sell, or contract to sell goods at unreasonably low prices for the purpose of destroying competition or eliminating a competitor. Any person violating any of the provisions of this section shall, upon conviction thereof, be fined not more than $5,000 or imprisoned not more than one year, or both.
22. lappuse - Provided, however, That nothing herein contained shall prevent a seller rebutting the prima-facie case thus made by showing that his lower price or the furnishing of services or facilities to any purchaser or purchasers was made in good faith to meet an equally low price of a competitor, or the services or facilities furnished by a competitor.
227. lappuse - Specifically, we think that a merger which produces a firm controlling an undue percentage share of the relevant market, and results in a significant increase in the concentration of firms in that market...
275. lappuse - It shall be unlawful for any person engaged in commerce, in the course of such commerce, to be a party to, or assist in, any transaction of sale, or contract to sell, which discriminates to his knowledge against competitors of the purchaser, in that, any discount, rebate, allowance, or advertising service charge is granted to the purchaser over and above any discount, rebate, allowance, or advertising service charge available at the time of such transaction to said competitors in respect of a sale...
285. lappuse - ... shall be guilty of a misdemeanor and, upon conviction thereof, shall be fined not more than $100,000 or imprisoned for not less than six months nor more than one year, or both.
272. lappuse - That the Federal Trade Commission may, after due investigation and hearing to all interested parties, fix and establish quantity limits, and revise the same as it finds necessary, as to particular commodities or classes of commodities, where it finds that available purchasers in greater quantities are so few as to render differentials on account thereof unjustly discriminatory or promotive of monopoly in any line of commerce...
275. lappuse - ... to sell, or contract to sell, goods in any part of the United States at prices lower than those exacted by said person elsewhere in the United States for the purpose of destroying competition, or eliminating a competitor...
67. lappuse - We believe that the Act reaches price discrimination that erodes competition as much as it does price discrimination that is intended to have immediate destructive impact. In this case, the evidence shows a drastically declining price structure which the jury could rationally attribute to continued or sporadic price discrimination. The jury was entitled to conclude that "the effect of such discrimination...
83. lappuse - In our opinion, the virtual legal monopoly conferred by Section 2(c) on one type of middleman clogs competition in the channels of distribution, and exacts tribute from the consumer for the benefit of a special business class. An example of the "tribute...