Report on the Robinson-Patman ActDepartment of Justice, 1977 - 320 lappuses |
No grāmatas satura
1.–5. rezultāts no 19.
104. lappuse
... bill legislating the absolute prohibition of chain stores . For example : 186 / 184 / Id . 185 / Id . at 5-6 . 186 / 80 CONG . REC . 8136 ( 1936 ) ( Remarks of Rep . Moritz ) . I do not know what our family would have done 104.
... bill legislating the absolute prohibition of chain stores . For example : 186 / 184 / Id . 185 / Id . at 5-6 . 186 / 80 CONG . REC . 8136 ( 1936 ) ( Remarks of Rep . Moritz ) . I do not know what our family would have done 104.
105. lappuse
... bill . You can not do that at the chain store . If that is radical , make the most of it . I believe the chain store should not only be curbed , but they should be eliminated , because the great harm they do far outweighs the little ...
... bill . You can not do that at the chain store . If that is radical , make the most of it . I believe the chain store should not only be curbed , but they should be eliminated , because the great harm they do far outweighs the little ...
108. lappuse
... bill to protect the farmers of this country , I say to my distinguished friends from the heart of New York where holders of privilege reside . I heard one witness before the Rules Committee say that 90 percent of the people affected by ...
... bill to protect the farmers of this country , I say to my distinguished friends from the heart of New York where holders of privilege reside . I heard one witness before the Rules Committee say that 90 percent of the people affected by ...
112. lappuse
... bill to levy a national tax on chains . The proposed tax would have been progressive , with the taxation on each outlet increased by the number of stores in the chain . Its most restrictive effect , however , was to attach prohibitive ...
... bill to levy a national tax on chains . The proposed tax would have been progressive , with the taxation on each outlet increased by the number of stores in the chain . Its most restrictive effect , however , was to attach prohibitive ...
114. lappuse
... bill was introduced on June 11 , 1935 , two weeks after the demise of the NRA . The bill , as drafted by H.B. Teegarden , counsel for the United States Wholesale Grocers Association , 207 / sought to attain an important goal embodied in ...
... bill was introduced on June 11 , 1935 , two weeks after the demise of the NRA . The bill , as drafted by H.B. Teegarden , counsel for the United States Wholesale Grocers Association , 207 / sought to attain an important goal embodied in ...
Citi izdevumi - Skatīt visu
Bieži izmantoti vārdi un frāzes
1817 LIBRARIES Act's actual advertising allowance anticompetitive antitrust laws Associated Wholesale Grocers Attorney backhaul benefit brokerage buyer buying cert chain stores charged Clayton Act Committee commodity competing competitors Cong consumer cooperative cost justification Court customers DCRG Hearings dealers discount distribution drug economic effect efficient eliminate enforcement establishment fair trade favored Federal Trade Commission firms Fred Meyer function higher prices impact independent industry injury to competition legislation low price lower prices manufacturer margin meeting competition defense merchandise MICHIGAN monopoly oligopolistic oligopoly operation Patman percent predation predatory pricing price competition price cutting price discrimination price reductions profits prohibit protect purchasers reduce regulatory repeal Report result Review Group Robinson Robinson-Patman Act secondary line Section 2(a seller selling Sess Sherman Act small business small businessmen small retailers smaller statute Subcommittee Hearings suppliers supra note Testimony tion unlawful Utah Pie violation wholesalers
Populāri fragmenti
272. lappuse - That it shall be unlawful for any person engaged in commerce, in the course of such commerce, either directly or indirectly, to discriminate in price between different purchasers of commodities of like grade and quality...
275. lappuse - ... elsewhere in the United States for the purpose of destroying competition or eliminating a competitor in such part of the United States; or, to sell, or contract to sell goods at unreasonably low prices for the purpose of destroying competition or eliminating a competitor. Any person violating any of the provisions of this section shall, upon conviction thereof, be fined not more than $5,000 or imprisoned not more than one year, or both.
22. lappuse - Provided, however, That nothing herein contained shall prevent a seller rebutting the prima-facie case thus made by showing that his lower price or the furnishing of services or facilities to any purchaser or purchasers was made in good faith to meet an equally low price of a competitor, or the services or facilities furnished by a competitor.
227. lappuse - Specifically, we think that a merger which produces a firm controlling an undue percentage share of the relevant market, and results in a significant increase in the concentration of firms in that market...
275. lappuse - It shall be unlawful for any person engaged in commerce, in the course of such commerce, to be a party to, or assist in, any transaction of sale, or contract to sell, which discriminates to his knowledge against competitors of the purchaser, in that, any discount, rebate, allowance, or advertising service charge is granted to the purchaser over and above any discount, rebate, allowance, or advertising service charge available at the time of such transaction to said competitors in respect of a sale...
285. lappuse - ... shall be guilty of a misdemeanor and, upon conviction thereof, shall be fined not more than $100,000 or imprisoned for not less than six months nor more than one year, or both.
272. lappuse - That the Federal Trade Commission may, after due investigation and hearing to all interested parties, fix and establish quantity limits, and revise the same as it finds necessary, as to particular commodities or classes of commodities, where it finds that available purchasers in greater quantities are so few as to render differentials on account thereof unjustly discriminatory or promotive of monopoly in any line of commerce...
275. lappuse - ... to sell, or contract to sell, goods in any part of the United States at prices lower than those exacted by said person elsewhere in the United States for the purpose of destroying competition, or eliminating a competitor...
67. lappuse - We believe that the Act reaches price discrimination that erodes competition as much as it does price discrimination that is intended to have immediate destructive impact. In this case, the evidence shows a drastically declining price structure which the jury could rationally attribute to continued or sporadic price discrimination. The jury was entitled to conclude that "the effect of such discrimination...
83. lappuse - In our opinion, the virtual legal monopoly conferred by Section 2(c) on one type of middleman clogs competition in the channels of distribution, and exacts tribute from the consumer for the benefit of a special business class. An example of the "tribute...