Copyright Holder Protection Act: Hearing Before the Subcommittee on Patents, Copyrights, and Trademarks of the Committee on the Judiciary, United States Senate, Ninety-ninth Congress, First Session, on S. 1384 ... November 20, 1985

Pirmais vāks

No grāmatas satura

Lietotāju komentāri - Rakstīt atsauksmi

Ierastajās vietās neesam atraduši nevienu atsauksmi.

Atlasītās lappuses

Citi izdevumi - Skatīt visu

Bieži izmantoti vārdi un frāzes

Populāri fragmenti

44. lappuse - A derivative work prepared under authority of the grant before its termination may continue to be utilized under the terms of the grant after its termination, but this privilege does not extend to the preparation after the termination of other derivative works based upon the copyrighted work covered by the terminated grant.
121. lappuse - Fred Fisher Music Co. v. M. Witmark & Sons, 318 US 643, 63 S.Ct 773, 87 L.Ed.
14. lappuse - derivative work" is a work based upon one or more preexisting works, such as a translation, musical arrangement, dramatization, fictionalization, motion picture version, sound recording, art reproduction, abridgment, condensation, or any other form in which a work may be recast, transformed, or adapted.
21. lappuse - Report of the Register of Copyrights on the General Revision of the US Copyright Law...
37. lappuse - These factors are : the nature and strength of the public interest served by the statute ; the extent to which the statute modifies or abrogates the asserted preenactment right, and the nature of the right that the statute alters.
116. lappuse - ... a person who with the consent of the author has created an opera or a motion picture film will often have made contributions literary, musical and economic, as great as or greater than the original author....
37. lappuse - The Supreme Court and The Constitutionality of Retroactive Legislation, 73 Harv. L. Rev. 692 (1960) ; Greenblatt, Judicial Limitations on Retroactive Civil Legislation, 51 NW Univ.
63. lappuse - ... Broadcasters); id., at 1651-1653 (letter of Leonard Feist, National Music Publishers' Association, Inc.); id., at 1653 ("I feel that the argument is not with the publisher because when I went into New York last year to compose the music for "A Chorus Line.' I did it with a new writer by the name of Ed Kleban. He is not a proven writer yet. He has been subsidized for the last few years, been given money by a publishing company to actually be able to live and to be allowed to write. I think that...
22. lappuse - A provision of this sort is needed because of the unequal bargaining position of authors, resulting in part from the impossibility of determining a work's value until it has been exploited.
154. lappuse - Chairman, as the chairman of the Patent. Trademark, and Copyright Section of the American Bar Association, and if it is agreeable with you, I will proceed with my statement first.

Bibliogrāfiskā informācija