 | E. Gabriel Perle, Mark A. Fischer, John Taylor Williams - 1999 - 1220 lapas
...prevailing publishing practices usually has been granted a power of attorney to draw up and record the "Fred Fisher Music Co. v. M. Witmark & Sons, 318 US 643, 657-59 (1943). assignment of the renewal copyright. By the same token, the widow or widower and children... | |
 | William S. Strong - 1999 - 386 lapas
...F.2d 737 (2d Cir. 1975). 23. Miller Music Company v. Chas. N. Daniels, Inc., 362 US 373 (1960). 24. Fred Fisher Music Co. v. M. Witmark & Sons, 318 US 643 (1943). 25. Marks Music Corp. v. Borst Music Pub. Co., 110 F.Supp. 923 (DNJ 1953). For an excellent discussion... | |
 | Laura Lee Stapleton - 2002 - 500 lapas
...Ahlert Music Corp. v. Warner/ Chappell Music, Inc., 155 F.3d 17 (2d Cir. 1998), 10.02[C]; 12.05[A] Fred Fisher Music Co. v. M. Witmark & Sons, 318 US 643 S. Ct. 773, 87 L. Ed. 1055, 57 USPQ 50 (1943), 10.02[C] Fundamental Too, Ltd. v. Gemmy Indus. Corp.,... | |
 | David Nimmer - 2003 - 545 lapas
...Amend and Consolidate the Acts Respecting Copyright, HR Rep No 2222, 60th Cong, 2d Sess 14 (1909). See Fred Fisher Music Co. v M. Witmark & Sons, 318 US 643, 653 (1943) (Congress chose two shorter terms, one original and one renewal period, rather than one... | |
 | Stephen M. McJohn - 2006 - 356 lapas
...assignment of renewal rights should not be effective, because this vitiated the protection for authors. Fred Fisher Music Co. v. M. Witmark & Sons, 318 US 643 (1943), however, held that an assignment of renewal rights was enforceable. The Court subsequently put an interesting... | |
 | Scott - 2007 - 1760 lapas
...Avalon Software, Inc., 209 BR 5 17, 520 (Bankr. D. Ariz. 1997), citing UCC §9-203; 17U.SC§205. 792 Fred Fisher Music Co. v. M. Witmark & Sons, 318 US 643, 656 (1943). at the commencement of the renewal period.793 Thus, the author' s surviving spouse or children... | |
| |
Fred Fisher Music Co. v. M. Witmark & Sons, 318 US 643, 63 S.Ct 773, 87 L.Ed. 