Copyright Holder Protection Act: Hearing Before the Subcommittee on Patents, Copyrights, and Trademarks of the Committee on the Judiciary, United States Senate, Ninety-ninth Congress, First Session, on S. 1384 ... November 20, 1985U.S. Government Printing Office, 1986 - 158 lappuses |
No grāmatas satura
1.5. rezultāts no 21.
5. lappuse
Section 203 establishes that authors and their heirs may terminate grants made
after January 1 , 1978 , at the end of a prescribed period of years , subject to the
derivative works exception . The aber the policy special consis heirs . nation ...
Section 203 establishes that authors and their heirs may terminate grants made
after January 1 , 1978 , at the end of a prescribed period of years , subject to the
derivative works exception . The aber the policy special consis heirs . nation ...
8. lappuse
Section 203 establishes that authors and their heirs may terminate grants made
after January 1 , 1978 , at the end of a prescribed period of years , subject to the
derivative works exception . My bill clarifies the derivative works exception in ...
Section 203 establishes that authors and their heirs may terminate grants made
after January 1 , 1978 , at the end of a prescribed period of years , subject to the
derivative works exception . My bill clarifies the derivative works exception in ...
14. lappuse
This 17 Section 24 of the 1909 Copyright Act gave the author of a work copyright
protection for a maximum period of 56 years - - an initial 28 year term and a
renewal term of 28 years . Under the 1976 Act works created after January 1 ,
1978 ...
This 17 Section 24 of the 1909 Copyright Act gave the author of a work copyright
protection for a maximum period of 56 years - - an initial 28 year term and a
renewal term of 28 years . Under the 1976 Act works created after January 1 ,
1978 ...
16. lappuse
... CONTROVERSY OVER DERIVATIVE WORK ROYALTIES A . Legislative
History of Derivative Work Exception 1 . P Revision Period 1961 - 1965 . Most of
the discussion concerning the derivative work exception occurred during this
period .
... CONTROVERSY OVER DERIVATIVE WORK ROYALTIES A . Legislative
History of Derivative Work Exception 1 . P Revision Period 1961 - 1965 . Most of
the discussion concerning the derivative work exception occurred during this
period .
17. lappuse
5 / Another commentator felt the proposed extension period was too short and
argued that any extension should revert to the author and his family and should
be inalienable . 61 The 1963 preliminary draft bill had two sections that contained
...
5 / Another commentator felt the proposed extension period was too short and
argued that any extension should revert to the author and his family and should
be inalienable . 61 The 1963 preliminary draft bill had two sections that contained
...
Lietotāju komentāri - Rakstīt atsauksmi
Ierastajās vietās neesam atraduši nevienu atsauksmi.
Citi izdevumi - Skatīt visu
Bieži izmantoti vārdi un frāzes
agreement amend Appeals arrangements assigned bargaining believe benefits bill clause Committee composer compromise Congress congressional intent continue contract Copyright Act Copyright Law covered created creators Dean decision derivative works exception discussion drafting effect efforts enacted existing exploit extended fact give going grant Group Harry Fox hearing heirs House important intent interests involved issue Judiciary Justice KARP language legislative legislative history LIBRARY OF CONGRESS license majority mechanical Mills Music motion picture music publishers noted Office opinion original owner paid parties payment period person position prepared present producer promote proposed protection provision question reason recapture receive record companies Register renewal respect result reversion Revision Ringer royalties section 203 Senator SPECTER share situation Snyder song songwriters sound recordings statement statute statutory Subcommittee success Supreme Court term termination Thank tion utilization Welk writers York
Populāri fragmenti
44. lappuse - A derivative work prepared under authority of the grant before its termination may continue to be utilized under the terms of the grant after its termination, but this privilege does not extend to the preparation after the termination of other derivative works based upon the copyrighted work covered by the terminated grant.
121. lappuse - Fred Fisher Music Co. v. M. Witmark & Sons, 318 US 643, 63 S.Ct 773, 87 L.Ed.
14. lappuse - derivative work" is a work based upon one or more preexisting works, such as a translation, musical arrangement, dramatization, fictionalization, motion picture version, sound recording, art reproduction, abridgment, condensation, or any other form in which a work may be recast, transformed, or adapted.
21. lappuse - Report of the Register of Copyrights on the General Revision of the US Copyright Law...
37. lappuse - These factors are : the nature and strength of the public interest served by the statute ; the extent to which the statute modifies or abrogates the asserted preenactment right, and the nature of the right that the statute alters.
116. lappuse - ... a person who with the consent of the author has created an opera or a motion picture film will often have made contributions literary, musical and economic, as great as or greater than the original author....
37. lappuse - The Supreme Court and The Constitutionality of Retroactive Legislation, 73 Harv. L. Rev. 692 (1960) ; Greenblatt, Judicial Limitations on Retroactive Civil Legislation, 51 NW Univ.
63. lappuse - ... Broadcasters); id., at 1651-1653 (letter of Leonard Feist, National Music Publishers' Association, Inc.); id., at 1653 ("I feel that the argument is not with the publisher because when I went into New York last year to compose the music for "A Chorus Line.' I did it with a new writer by the name of Ed Kleban. He is not a proven writer yet. He has been subsidized for the last few years, been given money by a publishing company to actually be able to live and to be allowed to write. I think that...
22. lappuse - A provision of this sort is needed because of the unequal bargaining position of authors, resulting in part from the impossibility of determining a work's value until it has been exploited.
154. lappuse - Chairman, as the chairman of the Patent. Trademark, and Copyright Section of the American Bar Association, and if it is agreeable with you, I will proceed with my statement first.
Bibliogrāfiskā informācija
| Nosaukums | Copyright Holder Protection Act: Hearing Before the Subcommittee on Patents, Copyrights, and Trademarks of the Committee on the Judiciary, United States Senate, Ninety-ninth Congress, First Session, on S. 1384 ... November 20, 1985 Grāmatas Copyright Holder Protection Act: Hearing Before the Subcommittee on Patents, Copyrights and Trademarks of the Committee on the Judiciary, United States Senate, Ninety-ninth Congress, First Session on S. 1384 ... November 20, 1985 4. sējums. sējums, United States. Congress. Senate. Committee on the Judiciary. Subcommittee on Patents, Copyrights, and Trademarks Grāmatas S. hrg 99. sējums,774. izdevums. sējums, United States Congress |
| Autors | United States. Congress. Senate. Committee on the Judiciary. Subcommittee on Patents, Copyrights, and Trademarks |
| Izdevējs | U.S. Government Printing Office, 1986 |
| Oriģināls no | Kongresa bibliotēka |
| Digitalizēta | 13.10.2006 |
| Apjoms | 158 lappuses |
| Eksportēt avotu | BiBTeX EndNote RefMan |