Copyright Holder Protection Act: Hearing Before the Subcommittee on Patents, Copyrights, and Trademarks of the Committee on the Judiciary, United States Senate, Ninety-ninth Congress, First Session, on S. 1384 ... November 20, 1985U.S. Government Printing Office, 1986 - 158 lappuses |
No grāmatas satura
1.5. rezultāts no 31.
5. lappuse
Section 304 extended the duration of subsisting copyrights from 56 to 75 years ,
but it also gave authors or certain of their heirs the right to terminate any of the
author ' s grants of rights and to reclaim full copyright ownership during the 19 ...
Section 304 extended the duration of subsisting copyrights from 56 to 75 years ,
but it also gave authors or certain of their heirs the right to terminate any of the
author ' s grants of rights and to reclaim full copyright ownership during the 19 ...
6. lappuse
In this case , we extended important benefits to creators in 1976 only to see those
benefits snatched away by the Supreme Court ' s mistaken interpretation of our
intent . In measuring the harm done and the urgency of remedial action , I hope ...
In this case , we extended important benefits to creators in 1976 only to see those
benefits snatched away by the Supreme Court ' s mistaken interpretation of our
intent . In measuring the harm done and the urgency of remedial action , I hope ...
7. lappuse
Section 304 extended the duration of subsisting copyrights from 56 to 75 years ,
but also gave authors or certain of their heirs the right to terminate any of the
author ' s grants of rights and to reclaim full copyright ownership during the 19 -
year ...
Section 304 extended the duration of subsisting copyrights from 56 to 75 years ,
but also gave authors or certain of their heirs the right to terminate any of the
author ' s grants of rights and to reclaim full copyright ownership during the 19 -
year ...
8. lappuse
In this case , we extended important benefits to creators in 1976 only to see those
benefits snatched away by the Supreme Court ' s faulty interpretation of our intent
. In measuring the harm done , and the urgency of remedial action , I hope that ...
In this case , we extended important benefits to creators in 1976 only to see those
benefits snatched away by the Supreme Court ' s faulty interpretation of our intent
. In measuring the harm done , and the urgency of remedial action , I hope that ...
10. lappuse
The 1976 Act is in many ways a pro - authors ' rights document : it gave authors
rights they never had before ; it extended the length of the life of the author ' s
copyright by many years ; and , for the first time it made juke box operators and
cable ...
The 1976 Act is in many ways a pro - authors ' rights document : it gave authors
rights they never had before ; it extended the length of the life of the author ' s
copyright by many years ; and , for the first time it made juke box operators and
cable ...
Lietotāju komentāri - Rakstīt atsauksmi
Ierastajās vietās neesam atraduši nevienu atsauksmi.
Citi izdevumi - Skatīt visu
Bieži izmantoti vārdi un frāzes
agreement amend Appeals arrangements assigned bargaining believe benefits bill clause Committee composer compromise Congress congressional intent continue contract Copyright Act Copyright Law covered created creators Dean decision derivative works exception discussion drafting effect efforts enacted existing exploit extended fact give going grant Group Harry Fox hearing heirs House important intent interests involved issue Judiciary Justice KARP language legislative legislative history LIBRARY OF CONGRESS license majority mechanical Mills Music motion picture music publishers noted Office opinion original owner paid parties payment period person position prepared present producer promote proposed protection provision question reason recapture receive record companies Register renewal respect result reversion Revision Ringer royalties section 203 Senator SPECTER share situation Snyder song songwriters sound recordings statement statute statutory Subcommittee success Supreme Court term termination Thank tion utilization Welk writers York
Populāri fragmenti
44. lappuse - A derivative work prepared under authority of the grant before its termination may continue to be utilized under the terms of the grant after its termination, but this privilege does not extend to the preparation after the termination of other derivative works based upon the copyrighted work covered by the terminated grant.
121. lappuse - Fred Fisher Music Co. v. M. Witmark & Sons, 318 US 643, 63 S.Ct 773, 87 L.Ed.
14. lappuse - derivative work" is a work based upon one or more preexisting works, such as a translation, musical arrangement, dramatization, fictionalization, motion picture version, sound recording, art reproduction, abridgment, condensation, or any other form in which a work may be recast, transformed, or adapted.
21. lappuse - Report of the Register of Copyrights on the General Revision of the US Copyright Law...
37. lappuse - These factors are : the nature and strength of the public interest served by the statute ; the extent to which the statute modifies or abrogates the asserted preenactment right, and the nature of the right that the statute alters.
116. lappuse - ... a person who with the consent of the author has created an opera or a motion picture film will often have made contributions literary, musical and economic, as great as or greater than the original author....
37. lappuse - The Supreme Court and The Constitutionality of Retroactive Legislation, 73 Harv. L. Rev. 692 (1960) ; Greenblatt, Judicial Limitations on Retroactive Civil Legislation, 51 NW Univ.
63. lappuse - ... Broadcasters); id., at 1651-1653 (letter of Leonard Feist, National Music Publishers' Association, Inc.); id., at 1653 ("I feel that the argument is not with the publisher because when I went into New York last year to compose the music for "A Chorus Line.' I did it with a new writer by the name of Ed Kleban. He is not a proven writer yet. He has been subsidized for the last few years, been given money by a publishing company to actually be able to live and to be allowed to write. I think that...
22. lappuse - A provision of this sort is needed because of the unequal bargaining position of authors, resulting in part from the impossibility of determining a work's value until it has been exploited.
154. lappuse - Chairman, as the chairman of the Patent. Trademark, and Copyright Section of the American Bar Association, and if it is agreeable with you, I will proceed with my statement first.
Bibliogrāfiskā informācija
| Nosaukums | Copyright Holder Protection Act: Hearing Before the Subcommittee on Patents, Copyrights, and Trademarks of the Committee on the Judiciary, United States Senate, Ninety-ninth Congress, First Session, on S. 1384 ... November 20, 1985 Grāmatas Copyright Holder Protection Act: Hearing Before the Subcommittee on Patents, Copyrights and Trademarks of the Committee on the Judiciary, United States Senate, Ninety-ninth Congress, First Session on S. 1384 ... November 20, 1985 4. sējums. sējums, United States. Congress. Senate. Committee on the Judiciary. Subcommittee on Patents, Copyrights, and Trademarks Grāmatas S. hrg 99. sējums,774. izdevums. sējums, United States Congress |
| Autors | United States. Congress. Senate. Committee on the Judiciary. Subcommittee on Patents, Copyrights, and Trademarks |
| Izdevējs | U.S. Government Printing Office, 1986 |
| Oriģināls no | Kongresa bibliotēka |
| Digitalizēta | 13.10.2006 |
| Apjoms | 158 lappuses |
| Eksportēt avotu | BiBTeX EndNote RefMan |