Lapas attēli
PDF
ePub

Taylor v. Bullen, 5 Ex. 779; 20 L. J. Ex. 21

v. Caldwell, 3 B. & S. 826; 32 L. J. Q. B. 164; 8 L. T. 356; 11
W. R. 726

[ocr errors]

v. Chambers, Cro. Jac. 68

v. Kymer, 3 B. & Ad. 320

PAGE

87

59, 60, 128

[ocr errors][merged small][merged small]

v. McKeand, 5 C. P. D. 358; 49 L. J. C. P. 563; 42 L. T. 833; 28
W. R. 628

[ocr errors]
[ocr errors]

v. Smith, [1893] 2 Q. B. 65; 61 L. J. Q. B. 331; 67 L. T. 39; 40
W. R. 486

.

[merged small][ocr errors][merged small]

Thacker v. Hardy, 4 Q. B. D. 685; 48 L. J. Q. B. 289; 39 L. T. 595; 26

[merged small][ocr errors][merged small][merged small]

Thornett v. Haines, 15 M. & W. 367; 15 L. J. Ex. 230

Thurnell v. Balbirnie, 2 C. B. 786; 2 M. & W. 786; M. & H. 235; 1 Jur. 847

[ocr errors]
[ocr errors]
[ocr errors]

Tigress, The, B. & L. 38; 32 L. J. Adm. 97; 9 Jur. N. S. 361; 8 L.
T. 117; 11 W. R. 538

Tilley v. Pope, 115 U. S. 213

[ocr errors]

150

[ocr errors][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][ocr errors][merged small][ocr errors][merged small][ocr errors][merged small][ocr errors][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][ocr errors][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small]

63

138

Tisdale v. Essex, Hob. 34
Tomkinson v. Staight, 17 C. B. 698; 25 L. J. C. P. 85; 2 Jur. N. S.
354

[ocr errors][merged small][ocr errors]

Townley v. Crump, 5 N. & M. 606; 4 A. & E. 58; 1 H. & W. 564.

Trent and Humber Co., In re, L. R. 4 Ch. 112; 38 L. J. Ch. 38; 19 465; 17 W. R. 181

[ocr errors][ocr errors][merged small][ocr errors]

Turley v. Bates, 2 H. & C. 200; 33 L. J. Ex. 43; 10 Jur. N. S. 368; 10
L. T. 35; 12 W. R. 438 .

[ocr errors]

Turner v. Goulden, L. R. 9 C. P. 57; 43 L. J. C. P. 60.

v. Liverpool Docks (Trustees), 6 Ex. 543; 20 L. J. Ex. 393

141, 227, 239

v. Mucklow, 8 Jur. N. S. 870; 6 L. T. N. S. 690; 10 W. R. 668 .89,
93, 95, 97, 99, 106, 107

Turney v. Dodwell, 3 E. & B. 136; 2 C. L. R. 666; 23 L. J. Q. B. 137 ;
18 Jur. 187
Tye v. Finmore, 3 Camp. 462

[merged small][ocr errors]

Tyers v. Rosedale Iron Co., L. R. 10 Ex. 195; 44 L. J. Ex. 130; 33 L. T. 56; 23 W. R. 871

ULLOCK V. Reddelein, Dans. & L. 6

[ocr errors][merged small][merged small]

48, 282, 283

98, 135, 200

· 301

114

Union Bank v. Munster, 37 Ch. D. 51; 57 L. J. Ch. 124; 57 L. T. 877; 36 W. R. 72

Upton v. Sturbridge Mills, 111 Mass. 446

Man. Co. v. Huiske, 69 Iowa, 557

. 110

PAGE

[ocr errors]

VALENTINI v. Canali, 24 Q. B. D. 166; 59 L. J. Q. B. 74; 61 L. T. 731; 38 W. R. 331

[ocr errors]

Valpy v. Gibson, 4 C. B. 837

10

236, 243, 247

v. Oakeley, 16 Q. B. 941; 20 L. J. Q. B. 380; 16 Jur. 38

.218,

[merged small][merged small][merged small][ocr errors][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small]

Vilmont v. Bentley, 18 Q. B. D. 322; 56 L. J. Q. B. 128; 56 L. T. 318; 35 W. R. 238; 51 J. P. 436, C. A.; 12 App. Cas. 471; 57 L. J. Q. B. 18; H. L. (E.) . 157, 158, 159, 305 Vyse v. Wakefield, 6 M. & W. 442; 8 D. P. C. 377; 9 L. J. Ex. 274

[ocr errors]
[ocr errors]

. 175

45, 49 56

210, 260, 261

63

[ocr errors]
[merged small][ocr errors][merged small][merged small]

Wagstaff v. Anderson, 5 C. P. D. 171; 49 L. J. C. P. 485; 42 L. T. 720;

[merged small][ocr errors][merged small][ocr errors][merged small][ocr errors][merged small][merged small]

Walker v. Langdale's Chemical Manure Co., 11 C. of Sess. Cas. (3rd series)

906

v. Matthews, 8 Q. B. D. 109; 51 L. J. Q. B. 243; 46 L. T. 915; 30 W. R. 338

[ocr errors]

v. Nussey, 16 M. & W. 302; 16 L. J. Ex. 120; 11 Jur. 23 Wallace v. Breeds, 13 East, 522; 1 Rose, 109.

v. Robinson & Co., 22 Sc. L. R. 830

98, 202

158

41, 42

. 113

206

Walter v. Everard, [1891] 2 Q. B. 369; 60 L. J. Q. B. 738; 65 L. T. 443; 39 W. R. 676

[ocr errors][merged small][ocr errors][ocr errors][ocr errors]

Walton, Ex parte, 17 Ch. D. 746; 50 L. J. Ch. 657; 45 L. T. 1; 30 W. R.
395
Ward v. Hobbs, 3 Q. B. D. 150; 4 App. Cas. 13; 48 L. J. C. P. 281; 40
L. T. 73; 27 W. R. 114

17

.

Warlow v. Harrison, 28 L. J. Q. B. 18; 1 E. & E. 295

Warwick v. Bruce, 2 M. & S. 205

Watkins v. Rymill, 10 Q. B. D. 178; 52 L. J. Q. B. 121; 48 L. T. 426; 31 W. R. 337; 47 J. P. 357

[ocr errors][ocr errors]

11

91, 148 300, 303

[merged small][ocr errors]
[merged small][ocr errors][ocr errors]

Watson, Ex parte, 5 Ch. D. 35; 46 L. J. Bk. 97; 36 L. T. 75; 25 W. R. 240, 241, 242, 253 In re, 25 Q. B. D. 27 ; 59 L. J. Q. B. 394 ; 63 L. T. 209; 38 W. R.

[ocr errors][ocr errors]
[merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][ocr errors][merged small][merged small][merged small][ocr errors]

Weaver, In re, 21 Ch. D. 615; 48 L. T. 93; 31 W. R. 224
Webb v. Fairmaner, 3 M. & W. 473; 6 D. P. C. 493
Webster v. British Empire Assurance Co., 15 Ch. D. 169; 49 L. J. Ch.

Wentworth v. Outhwaite, 10 M. & W. 436; 12 L. J. Ex. 172

12

67, 183

290 104, 288

172

217, 224, 264, 265

[merged small][ocr errors]

Whistler v. Foster, 14 C. B. N. S. 248; 32 L. J. C. P. 161.
White, Ex parte, L. R. 6 Ch. 397; S. C. in H. L. 21 W. R. 465

PAGE

262, 263

135

€ 149

2, 21, 126, 129

White v. Beeton, 7 H. & N. 42; 30 L. J. Ex. 373; 7 Jur. N. S. 735; 4 L. T. 474; 9 W. R. 751.

[ocr errors]

v. Garden, 10 C. B. 919; 20 L. J. C. P. 166; 15 Jur. 630
v. Proctor, 4 Taunt. 209

v. Wilks, 5 Taunt. 176; 1 Marsh. 2

[ocr errors]

Whitehead v. Anderson, 9 M. & W. 518; 11 L. J. Ex. 157.

[merged small][ocr errors][merged small]

74

154, 156 . 50 .113

242, 244, 245, 247, 248, 253, 254

Wigglesworth v. Dallison, 1 Dougl. 201; 1 Sm. L. C. (9th ed.) 569

[ocr errors][merged small][merged small]

Wilkins v. Bromhead, 6 M. & G. 963; 7 Scott, N. R. 921; 13 L. J. C. P. 74; 8 Jur. 83

[merged small][ocr errors][merged small]

.134

[merged small][ocr errors][merged small][merged small]

10

[ocr errors]

279

. 217

v. Moor, 11 M. & W. 256; 2 D. N. S. 993; 12 L. J. Ex. 253; 7 Jur. 817

[ocr errors][ocr errors][ocr errors][ocr errors]

v. Reynolds, 11 Jur. N. S. 973; 12 L. T. 728; 6 B. & S. 495 Willoughby, Ex parte, 16 Ch. D. 604; 44 L. T. 111; 29 W. R. 935 Wilmshurst v. Bowker, 7 M. & G. 882; 8 Scott N. R. 571; 12 L. J. C. P. 475

Wilson v. Dunville, L. R. Ir. 4 Ex. 249; 6 L. R. Ir. 210

[merged small][ocr errors]

Wingfield, Ex parte, 10 Ch. D. 591; 40 L. T. 15; 27 W. R. 346

Wiseman v. Vandeput, 2 Vern. 202

Withers v. Reynolds, 2 B. & A. 882

Wood v. Baxter, 49 L. T. N. S. 45

[ocr errors][merged small]
[merged small][merged small][merged small][ocr errors][ocr errors][merged small][merged small][ocr errors][ocr errors][merged small]

6 E. & B. 355; 25 L. J. Q. B.

[ocr errors][merged small][merged small]

v. Manley, 3 P. & D. 5; 11 A. & E. 34; 3 Jur. 1028
v. Tassell, 6 Q. B. 234.

185, 186

Woodland v. Fuller, 3 P. & D. 570; 4 Jur. 743; 11 Ad. & E. 859
Woodley v. Coventry, 2 H. & C. 164; 32 L. J. Ex. 185; 9 Jur. N. S. 548;

8 L. T. 249; 11 W. R. 599

Woods v. Russell, 1 D. & R. 58; 5 B. & A. 942.

Woolfe v. Horne, 2 Q. B. D. 355

Wotton v. Hele, 2 Wms. Saund. 526

[merged small][merged small][merged small][ocr errors][merged small][merged small][merged small]

Wyman v. Knight, 39 Ch. D. 165; 57 L. J. Ch. 886; 59 L. T. 164; 37 W. R. 76.

[ocr errors][ocr errors]

Wyper v. Harveys, 23 Court Sess. Cas. (2nd Ser.), 606; 33 Jur. 298

285

[merged small][ocr errors][merged small][merged small][ocr errors][merged small][ocr errors][merged small][merged small][merged small]

ADDENDA ET CORRIGENDA.

Page 11.-Dele the comma after "à fortiori," in line 8 from foot.

[ocr errors]
[ocr errors]
[ocr errors]

52, 300.-The rule as to the authority of an auctioneer's clerk to sign for the buyer confirmed in Sims v. Laudray (1894), 63 L. J. Ch. 535. So also the authority of the auctioneer (at p. 536).

67, note (k)." Gathorne v. Adams" should be "Gattorno v. Adams."

95, 96.-The entire paragraph, commencing with In a sale, should be in inverted commas.

,, 132, line 23.-" Appropriated by the other" should be "to the other."

[ocr errors]

99

159. The view here stated, that Moyce v. Newington is good law, confirmed at the County of London Sessions in R. v. Konig (L. T. Jour., Aug. 25th, p. 373).

Held also, apparently, that the Court had no jurisdiction to grant a restitution order against an innocent purchaser for value.

170 (Ill. 2). The words "by word of mouth" should apply to A.'s sale to B., and not B.'s to D.

,, 210, 211.-The entire paragraph, commencing with The payment, should be in inverted commas.

,, 217, line 27.-For "vendor's default," read "vendee's."

,, 237, line 7 from foot.-For "receives," read ":
'reserves."

,, 280, in Illustration.-For "Hinch v. Liddell," read "Hinde v. Liddell.”

,, 283, line 5 from foot.-For "defendant," read "plaintiff.”

The references throughout are to the last editions of Mr. Benjamin's
and Lord Blackburn's treatises, viz. :

Benjamin on Sale (1888), 4th edition, by A. B. Pearson-Gee and H. F. Boyd.
Blackburn on Sale (1885), 2nd edition, by J. C. Graham.

EFFECT OF THE ACT ON THE PREVIOUS LAW.

A. Certain Changes in the Law.

1. Sect. 18, Rules 2 and 3, pp. 119, 124.-The provision as to notice by buyer of acts done by seller to pass the property.

2. Sect. 24 (2), p. 156.-Overrules Bentley v. Vilmont, and semble restores the law of Moyce v. Newington; and in consequence repeals the Larceny and Summary Jurisdiction Acts, so far as they are inconsistent.

3. Sect. 25 (1) (2), pp. 160, 166.—Reproduces sects. 8, 9 of the Factors Act, 1889, with the omissions mentioned.

4. Sect. 26 (1), p. 171.-Addition of the word "hour" before "day, month, and year," in the 29 Car. 2, c. 3, s. 16.

5. Sect. 29 (4), p. 186.-"A reasonable hour" is made a question of fact; and the rules in Startup v. Macdonald (1844), 6 M. & G. 593, are abrogated. See also sect. 56.

6. Sect. 51 (3), p. 284.-English rule as regards profits as damages applicable to Scotland, and Dunlop v. Higgins (1848), 1 H. L. 381, is overruled.

7. Sect. 52, p. 284.-The words "or ascertained" added after " 'specific." "Price in money" is also omitted, but no change appears to have been made thereby.

B. Submitted Changes in the Law.

1. Sect. 4, p. 21.-The words "things attached to, &c. the land agreed to be severed," as part of the definition of "goods," has probably abrogated Rodwell v. Phillips (1842), 9 M. & W. 502, and similar cases, and Lavery v. Pursell (1888), 39 Ch. D. 508; and has extended Marshall v. Green (1875), 1 C. P. D. 42.

The law laid down in Lee v. Gaskell (1876), 1 Q. B. D. 700, would also appear to be changed in cases where fixtures are sold to a person not an incoming tenant.

2. Sect. 4, p. 46.-The rule in Egerton v. Matthews (1805), 6 East, 307 (if really existing at the date of the Act), with regard to the statement in the memorandum of the fact of agreement, would appear now to be assimilated to that in Wain v. Warlters (1804), 2 S. L. C. (9th ed.) 266, by virtue of the substitution of the word "contract" for " bargain.

3. Sect. 24 (1), pp. 156, 157.-The necessity of the offender being prosecuted "by or on behalf of the owner," as under previous Acts, is apparently done away with.

4. Sect. 41 (2), p. 222.—The seller's lien, after his attornment to the buyer, is not now confined to cases of the buyer's insolvency, as it seems to have been previously.

« iepriekšējāTurpināt »