Postal Union of the Americas and Spain Parcel-post.agreement between the United States and New Zealand . International convention relating to economic statistics . Reservations made by the Netherlands in respect of the Nether- PROMOTION OF PEACE ARBITRATION, CONCILIATION, AND JUDICIAL BILATERAL TREATIES OF ARBITRATION AND CONCILIATION Netherlands-Japan The American Minister to the Netherlands informed the Secretary of State by a despatch dated April 26, 1933, that there was signed on April 19, 1933, a treaty between the Netherlands and Japan relating to jurisprudence, arbitration, and conciliation. Netherlands-Norway The American Minister to the Netherlands informed the Secretary of State by a despatch dated April 21, 1933, that a treaty of conciliation, jurisprudence, and arbitration between the Netherlands and Norway was signed on March 23, 1933. Netherlands-Venezuela The American Minister to the Netherlands reported in a despatch dated April 21, 1933, the signing on April 5, 1933, of a treaty of conciliation, jurisprudence, and arbitration between the Netherlands and Venezuela. United States-Switzerland The Department has been informed by the American Legation at Pretoria. Union of South Africa, that Mr. Justice C. W. H. Lansdown of the Supreme Court of the Union of South Africa, Natal Division, has accepted the invitation of this Government to serve as the American nonnational member of the Permanent Commission of Conciliation provided for by the treaty of arbitration and conciliation signed by the United States and Switzerland on February 18, 1931. A short time ago Mr. Rafael Erich, former Prime Minister of Finland, accepted the invitations of the Governments of Switzerland and of the United States to serve as the joint member of the abovementioned commission. This commission is now complete in its personnel and is constituted as follows: American Commissioners: National: Mr. George Wharton Pepper, former United Nonnational: Mr. Justice C. W. H. Lansdown of the Union of South Africa Swiss Commissioners: National: Mr. Max Huber, President of the International Nonnational: Mr. Ake Hammarskjöld, of Sweden, Registrar of the Permanent Court of International Justice. Joint Commissioner: Mr. Rafael Erich, former Prime Minister of Finland PERMANENT COURT OF INTERNATIONAL JUSTICE 1 Paraguay The American Consul at Geneva reported by a telegram dated May 12, 1933, that the instruments of ratification by Paraguay of the protocol of signature of the Statute of the Permanent Court of International Justice, signed December 16, 1920, and the protocol concerning the revision of the Statute of the Permanent Court of International Justice, signed September 14, 1929, were deposited with the Secretariat on May 11, 1933. ARTICLE 36 OF THE STATUTE OF THE PERMANENT COURT OF INTERNATIONAL JUSTICE Paraguay By a telegram dated May 12, 1933, the American Consul at Geneva reported that the instrument of ratification by Paraguay of the optional clause provided in the protocol of signature to the Statute of the Permanent Court of International Justice was deposited with the Secretariat on May 11, 1933. ARMAMENT REDUCTION MESSAGE OF THE PRESIDENT, MAY 16, 1933, TO THE HEADS OF THOSE NATIONS PARTICIPATING IN THE DISARMAMENT CONFERENCE AND THE MONETARY AND ECONOMIC CONFERENCE "A profound hope of the people of my country impels me, as the head of their Government, to address you and, through you, the people of your nation. This hope is that peace may be assured through practical measures of disarmament and that all of us may carry to victory our common struggle against economic chaos. "To these ends the nations have called two great world conferences. The happiness, the prosperity, and the very lives of the men, women, See Bulletin No. 42, March 1933, p. 1. and children who inhabit the whole world are bound up in the decisions which their governments will make in the near future. The improvement of social conditions, the preservation of individual human rights, and the furtherance of social justice are dependent upon these decisions. "The world economic conference will meet soon and must come to its conclusions quickly. The world cannot await deliberations long drawn out. The conference must establish order in place of the present chaos by a stabilization of currencies, by freeing the flow of world trade, and by international action to raise price levels. It must, in short, supplement individual domestic programs for economic recovery, by wise and considered international action. "The disarmament conference has labored for more than a year and, as yet, has been unable to reach satisfactory conclusions. Confused purposes still clash dangerously. Our duty lies in the direction of bringing practical results through concerted action based upon the greatest good to the greatest number. Before the imperative call of this great duty petty obstacles must be swept away and petty aims forgotten. A selfish victory is always destined to be an ultimate defeat. The furtherance of durable peace for our generation in every part of the world is the only goal worthy of our best efforts. "If we ask what are the reasons for armaments, which, in spite of the lessons and tragedies of the World War, are today a greater burden on the peoples of the earth than ever before, it becomes clear that they are twofold: First, the desire, disclosed or hidden, on the part of governments to enlarge their territories at the expense of a sister nation. I believe that only a small minority of governments or of peoples harbor such a purpose. Second, the fear of nations that they will be invaded. I believe that the overwhelming majority of peoples feel obliged to retain excessive armaments because they fear some act of aggression against them and not because they themselves seek to be aggressors. "There is justification for this fear. Modern weapons of offense are vastly stronger than modern weapons of defense. Frontier forts, trenches, wire entanglements, coast defenses-in a word, fixed fortifications are no longer impregnable to the attack of war planes, heavy mobile artillery, land battleships called tanks, and poison gas. "If all nations will agree wholly to eliminate from possession and use the weapons which make possible a successful attack, defenses automatically will become impregnable, and the frontiers and independence of every nation will become secure. "The ultimate objective of the disarmament conference must be the complete elimination of all offensive weapons. The immediate objective is a substantial reduction of some of these weapons and the elimination of many others. "This Government believes that the program for immediate reduction of aggressive weapons, now under discussion at Geneva, is but a first step toward our ultimate goal. We do not believe that the proposed immediate steps go far enough. Nevertheless, this Government welcomes the measures now proposed and will exert its influence toward the attainment of further successive steps of disarmament. "Stated in the clearest way, there are three steps to be agreed upon in the present discussions: "First. To take, at once, the first definite step toward this objective, as broadly outlined in the MacDonald plan. "Second. To agree upon time and procedure for taking the following steps. "Third. To agree that while the first and the following steps are being taken, no nation shall increase its existing armaments over and above the limitations of treaty obligations. "But the peace of the world must be assured during the whole period of disarmament and I, therefore, propose a fourth step concurrent with and wholly dependent on the faithful fulfillment of these three proposals and subject to existing treaty rights: "That all the nations of the world should enter into a solemn and definite pact of nonaggression. That they should solemnly reaffirm the obligations they have assumed to limit and reduce their armaments, and, provided these obligations are faithfully executed by all signatory powers, individually agree that they will send no armed force of whatsoever nature across their frontiers. "Common sense points out that if any strong nation refuses to join with genuine sincerity in these concerted efforts for political and economic peace, the one at Geneva and the other at London, progress can be obstructed and ultimately blocked. In such event the civilized world, seeking both forms of peace, will know where the responsibility for failure lies. I urge that no nation assume such a responsibility, and that all the nations joined in these great conferences translate their professed policies into action. This is the way to political and economic peace. “I trust that your Government will join in the fulfillment of these hopes. "FRANKLIN D. ROOSEVELT This message was cabled on May 16, 1933, direct to the respective heads of the nations as listed below: His Majesty ZoG I, King of the Albanians, Tirana, Albania. |