...restrained." In the Straus Case the Court said: M "No more than the patent statute was the copyright act intended to authorize agreements in unlawful restraint...entered into to build up and perpetuate monopolies." Through all these cases can be traced two principles: first, that the "Anti-Trust Laws," except the...

...SAMK — SAME — RCGHTS CONFERRED RY COPYRIGHT. No more than the patent statute was the Copyright Act intended to authorize agreements in unlawful restraint...trade and tending to monopoly in violation of the Sherman Act. 3. SAME — SAME — COMRINATION TO MAINTAIN PRICES ON COPYRIGHTED BOOKS. As the agreement...

...unlawful restraint of trade and tending to monopoly in violation of the Sherman Act. The Sherman Act is broadly designed to reach all combinations in unlawful...entered into, to build up and perpetuate monopolies. The act is a limitation of rights which may be pushed to evil consequences and may, therefore, be restrained....

...restraints and monopolies. In the language of the Supreme Court, as late as Dec. 1, 1913, the Sherman law "is broadly designed to reach all combinations in...entered into, to build up and perpetuate monopolies. ' ' Straus v. American Publishers ' Asso., 34 Supreme Court Reporter, 84, 87. No corporation is within...

...extensive than that secured under the patent law. Xo more than the patent statute was the copyright act intended to authorize agreements in unlawful restraint...violation of the specific terms of the Sherman law. . . . "It appears that the Publishers' Association was composed of probably 75 per cent of the publishers...

...is denied by the decision of the state court. No more than the patent statute was the copyright act intended to authorize agreements in unlawful restraint...trade and tending to monopoly in violation of the Sherman Act. The Sherman Act is broadly designed to reach all combinations in unlawful restraint of...

...is denied by the decision of the state court. No more than the patent statute was the copyright act intended to authorize agreements in unlawful restraint...trade and tending to monopoly in violation of the Sherman Act. The Sherman Act is broadly designed to reach all combinations in unlawful restraint of...

...Nashville Railroad Company v. Garrett, 231 US 298). No more than the patent statute was the copyright act intended to authorize agreements in unlawful restraint...trade and tending to monopoly in violation of the Sherman Act (Straus v. American Publishers' Association, 231 US 222). While a custom of railroads cannot...

...sales control through patents, was thus stated: " No more than the patent statute was the copyright act intended to authorize agreements in unlawful restraint...entered into to build up and perpetuate monopolies."* Naturally the cutting of this Gordian knot produced much confusion in mercantile circles. In the grocery...

...restrained." In the Straus Case the Court said: ** "No more than the patent statute was the copyright act intended to authorize agreements in unlawful restraint...entered into to build up and perpetuate monopolies." Through all these cases can be traced two principles: first, that the "Anti-Trust Laws," except the...