Lapas attēli
PDF
ePub

TABLE 3.-ESTIMATED FULL-YEAR DECREASE IN INDIVIDUAL INCOME TAX LIABILITY UNDER THE LIBERALIZED MINIMUM STANDARD DEDUCTION PROVISION OF THE COMMITTEE FLOOR AMENDMENT-BY ADJUSTED GROSS INCOME CLASS: 1975 INCOME LEVELS 1

[blocks in formation]

1 This table represents the decrease in tax liability under the $2,000-$2,700/16 percent/$2,400-$2,800 standard deduction as compared to the $1,700-$2,100/16 percent/$2,400-$2,800 standard deduction.

Note: Details may not add to totals because of rounding.

TABLE 2.-SENATE FINANCE COMMITTEE FLOOR AMENDMENTS TO H.R. 106121: ESTIMATED EFFECT ON FISCAL YEAR RECEIPTS-Continued

[merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][ocr errors][merged small][merged small][ocr errors][subsumed][merged small][merged small][ocr errors][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][ocr errors][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][ocr errors][merged small][ocr errors][merged small][ocr errors][merged small][merged small][ocr errors][ocr errors][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][ocr errors][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small]

1 Additional amendments agreed to by the committee after the bill was ordered reported. These amendments are to be offered on the floor.

2 Less than $5,000,000.

There is also an estimated $2,000,000 decrease in budget receipts for fiscal year 1976 under this provision.

It is estimated that this provision will decrease budget receipts by $65,000,000 in the aggregate over the next 5 fiscal

years.

This is the net effect of this provision after deducting from the gross decrease in budget receipts the increase in the Finance Committee minimum tax.

TABLE 3.-ESTIMATED FULL-YEAR DECREASE IN INDIVIDUAL INCOME TAX LIABILITY UNDER THE LIBERALIZED MINIMUM STANDARD DEDUCTION PROVISION OF THE COMMITTEE FLOOR AMENDMENT-BY ADJUSTED GROSS INCOME CLASS: 1975 INCOME LEVELS 1

[blocks in formation]

1 This table represents the decrease in tax liability under the $2,000-$2,700/16 percent/$2,400-$2,800 standard deduction as compared to the $1,700-$2,100/16 percent/$2,400-$2,800 standard deduction.

Note: Details may not add to totals because of rounding.

TABLE 4.-INDIVIDUAL INCOME TAX BURDEN 1 IN 1978 UNDER THE STANDARD DEDUCTION AND EARNED INCOME CREDIT PROVISIONS APPROVED IN THE SENATE FINANCE COMMITTEE REPORT 2 AND UNDER THE STANDARD DEDUCTION AND EARNED INCOME CREDIT PROVISIONS IN THE COMMITTEE FLOOR AMENDMENT 3

SINGLE PERSON AND MARRIED COUPLE WITH NO, 1, 2, AND 4 DEPENDENTS

[Assuming deductible personal expenses of 17 percent of income]

[blocks in formation]

report ment

floor

floor

floor

Under floor

Adjusted gross income

Under report

amend

ment

Under report

Under report

provisions provisions Reduction provisions provisions Reduction provisions provisions Reduction provisions provisions Reduction provisions provisions

amendment

amendment

Under

amend

report

ment

Reduction

[blocks in formation]

1 Computed without reference to the tax tables.

2 Includes the effect of the $1,700-$2,100/16 percent/$2,400-$2,800 standard deduction and the 10-percent credit on earned income phased out between $4,000 and $3,000 of adjusted gross income.

3 Includes the effect of the $2,000-$2,700/16 percent/$2,400-$2,800 standard deduction and the 10 percent credit on earned income phased out between $4,000 and $8,000 of adjusted gross income. 4 Wage or salary and/or self-employment income.

III. EXPLANATION OF ADDITIONAL COMMITTEE AMENDMENT TO H.R. 10612, AS REPORTED

A. TITLE XXII-ESTATE AND GIFT TAXES

1. Allowance of Credit Against Estate Tax (sec. 2201(a) of the bill and sec. 2010 of the Code)

Present law

Under present law, the estate of each decedent who was a resident or a citizen is entitled to an exemption of $60,000 for estate tax purposes. In the case of an estate of a nonresident alien, the exemption is $30,000.

Reasons for change

The present amount of the estate tax exemption was set in 1942. Since that date, the purchasing power of the dollar has decreased to less than one-third of its value in 1942. To some extent this effect has been mitigated by the addition of a provision for a marital deduction in 1948. Despite this the inflation which has occurred means that the estate tax now has a much broader impact than was originally contemplated.

In addition, since the present estate tax exemption is a deduction in determining the taxable estate, it results in a greater reduction at the estate's highest estate tax brackets. However, a credit in lieu of an exemption will have the effect of reducing the estate tax at the estate's lower estate tax brackets since a tax credit is applied as a dollar-fordollar reduction of the amount otherwise due. Thus, at a given level of revenue cost, a tax credit tends to confer more tax savings on smalland medium-sized estates, whereas a deduction tends to confer more tax savings on larger estates. The committee believes it would be more equitable if the exemption were replaced with a credit rather than a deduction.

Explanation of provision

The committee amendment provides for a credit in lieu of the present exemption for estate tax purposes. The amount of the credit will be $30,000 for decedents dying in 1977 and increases $5,000 each year until 1981 when the credit will be $50,000. When fully effective, the $50,000 credit is approximately equivalent to a tax exemption on the first $197,000 of the decedent's taxable estate. Thus, in 1981 an estate of $197,000 or less will be exempt from estate tax. The committee amendment also makes comparable changes in the treatment of estates of nonresident aliens.

Effective date

This amendment is effective for estates of decedents dying after December 31, 1976.

[blocks in formation]
« iepriekšējāTurpināt »