Decisions of the Commissioner of Patents and of the United States Courts in Patent and Trade-mark and Copyright CasesU.S. Government Printing Office, 1891 "Compiled from Official gazette. Beginning with 1876, the volumes have included also decisions of United States courts, decisions of Secretary of Interior, opinions of Attorney-General, and important decisions of state courts in relation to patents, trade-marks, etc. 1869-94, not in Congressional set." Checklist of U. S. public documents, 1789-1909, p. 530. |
Saturs
| 424 | |
| 434 | |
| 463 | |
| 464 | |
| 470 | |
| 481 | |
| 497 | |
| 507 | |
| 86 | |
| 92 | |
| 93 | |
| 100 | |
| 106 | |
| 114 | |
| 120 | |
| 128 | |
| 138 | |
| 140 | |
| 151 | |
| 179 | |
| 185 | |
| 189 | |
| 197 | |
| 243 | |
| 256 | |
| 259 | |
| 281 | |
| 287 | |
| 305 | |
| 330 | |
| 333 | |
| 341 | |
| 395 | |
| 402 | |
| 412 | |
| 421 | |
| 509 | |
| 518 | |
| 546 | |
| 553 | |
| 559 | |
| 585 | |
| 597 | |
| 601 | |
| 615 | |
| 623 | |
| 624 | |
| 626 | |
| 628 | |
| 636 | |
| 639 | |
| 640 | |
| 644 | |
| 646 | |
| 649 | |
| 652 | |
| 656 | |
| 658 | |
| 659 | |
| 667 | |
| 672 | |
| 673 | |
| 676 | |
Citi izdevumi - Skatīt visu
Bieži izmantoti vārdi un frāzes
action affidavit alleged amendment appeal assignment battery beer bill bolt-work carbons Circuit Court cited claim combination Company complainant complainant's connected construction court of equity covered Decided decision decree defendant device diligence disclosed division divisional application drawings Ecaubert electric entitled equity evidence Ex parte Roberts Examiner of Interferences Examiners-in-Chief fact filed filtering beer follows foreign patent ground gusset held improvement infringement interference proceedings invention inventor involved issue key lock knurl Letters Patent lock machine manufacture means mechanism ment Messrs metal MITCHELL motion novelty operation opinion original patent party Patent Office pending petition plaintiff practice preliminary statements present Primary Examiner prior prior art process and apparatus proof purpose question reason reduction to practice reference reissue rejected result Revised Statutes rule Rule 94 shown specification Stockheim subject-matter substantially as described suit testimony thereof time-lock tion Trade-Mark words Zwietusch
Populāri fragmenti
306. lappuse - ... may adjudge that such applicant is entitled, according to law, to receive a patent for his invention, as specified in his claim or for any part thereof, as the facts in the case may appear. And such adjudication, if it be in favor of the right of the applicant, shall authorize the Commissioner to issue such patent on the applicant filing in the Patent Office a copy of the adjudication and otherwise complying with the requirements of law.
310. lappuse - ... no civil suit shall be brought before either of said courts against any person by any original process or proceeding in any other district than that whereof he is an inhabitant, but where the jurisdiction is founded only on the fact that the action is between citizens of different states, suit shall be brought only in the district of the residence of either the plaintiff or the defendant...
252. lappuse - But a mere carrying forward or new or more extended application of the original thought, a change only in form, proportions, or degree, the substitution of equivalents, doing substantially the same thing] In the same way by substantially the same means with better results, Is not such invention as will sustain a patent...
531. lappuse - That every person or corporation who has. or shall have, purchased or constructed any newly invented machine, manufacture, or composition of matter, prior to the application by the inventor or discoverer for a patent, shall be held to possess the right to use, and vend to others to be used, the specific machine, manufacture, or composition of matter so made or purchased, without liability therefor to the inventor, or any other person interested in such invention...
284. lappuse - The claim is a statutory requirement, prescribed for the very purpose of making the patentee define precisely what his invention is; and it is unjust to the public, as well as an evasion of the law, to construe it in a manner different from the plain import of its terms.
280. lappuse - But every patent granted for an invention which has been previously patented in a foreign country shall be so limited as to expire at the same time with the foreign patent...
115. lappuse - Whenever it appears that a patentee, at the time of making his application for the patent, believed himself to be the original and first inventor or discoverer of the thing patented, the same shall not be held to be void on account of the invention or discovery, or any part thereof, having been known or used in a foreign country, before his invention or discovery thereof, if it had not been patented or described in a printed publication.
506. lappuse - The process of development in manufactures creates a constant demand for new appliances, which the skill of ordinary head workmen and engineers is generally adequate to devise, and which, indeed, are the natural and proper outgrowth of such development. Each step forward prepares the way for the next, and each is usually taken by spontaneous trials and attempts in a hundred different places. To grant to a single party a monopoly of every slight advance made, except where the exercise of invention,...
59. lappuse - ... explain the principle thereof, and the best mode in which he has contemplated applying that principle, so as to distinguish it from other inventions ; and he shall particularly point out and distinctly claim the part, improvement, or combination which he claims as his invention or discovery.
422. lappuse - ... in public use or on sale in the United States for more than two years prior to...