Hearing on National Defense Authorization Act, Fiscal Year 1990--H.R. 2461 and Oversight of Previously Authorized Programs Before the Committee on Armed Services, House of Representatives, One Hundred First Congress, First Session: Military Installations and Facilities Subcommittee Hearing on Civil Defense : Hearing Held March 15, 1989

Pirmais vāks
 

Atlasītās lappuses

Bieži izmantoti vārdi un frāzes

Populāri fragmenti

36. lappuse - Mr Chairman, and Members of the Committee, I appreciate very much the opportunity to testify before you today on a very serious matter — crime in the Washington Metropolitan area.
1. lappuse - The subcommittee met, pursuant to call, at 10:02 am in room 2212, Rayburn House Office Building, Hon. Patricia Schroeder (chairwoman of the subcommittee) presiding. OPENING STATEMENT OF HON. PATRICIA SCHROEDER, A REPRESENTATIVE FROM COLORADO, CHAIRWOMAN, RESEARCH AND TECHNOLOGY SUBCOMMITTEE Mrs.
16. lappuse - I would like to thank you and the Members of the committee for giving me the opportunity to present the budgetary requirements of the Office of Employee Appeals.
14. lappuse - Directing the Secretary of Defense to furnish certain information to the House of Representatives concerning the actions of the Commission on Base Realignment and Closure with respect to Fort Dix, New Jersey.
13. lappuse - States. 1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives 2 of the United States of America in...
16. lappuse - Res. 226, directing the Secretary of Defense to furnish certain information to the House of Representatives relating to American prisoners of war in Southeast Asia.
26. lappuse - Please do not hesitate to contact us if we can be of further assistance in this or any other matter.
7. lappuse - Mr. Chairman, I ask unanimous consent to revise and extend my remarks. The CHAIRMAN. Without objection, it is so ordered.
7. lappuse - March, 1989 exposed serious weaknesses with respect to the monitoring and enforcement of third-country transfer provisions related to agreements for the coproduction and license manufacture of US military equipment by foreign countries. Among the findings were: DOD, State and other US government agencies do not directly manage or monitor coproduction programs to ensure compliance both on production quantities and third-country sales of coproduced items by foreign governments; There is no requirement...

Bibliogrāfiskā informācija