Lapas attēli
PDF
ePub

Canadian National Railways

Lines in Canada

Lines in United States:

Canadian National lines in New England

Duluth, Winnipeg & Pacific Railway

Champlain & St. Lawrence Railroad

United States & Canada Railroad
St. Clair Tunnel

International Bridge

Central Vermont Railway, Inc.

Grand Trunk Western Railroad

Muskegon Railway & Navigation Co.

Vermont & Province Line

New York-Niagara Frontier

Minnesota & Manitoba Railroad (leased line)

Canadian Pacific Railway

Lines in Canada
Includes-

Dominion Atlantic Railway
Quebec Central Railway

Lines in United States:

Canadian Pacific lines in Vermont
Canadian Pacific lines in Maine

Central of Georgia Railway

Louisville & Wadley Railroad Wadley Southern Railway Wrightsville & Tennille Railroad Central Railroad Co. of New Jersey Wharton & Northern Railroad Charleston & Western Carolina Railway Chesapeake & Ohio Railway

Chicago & Eastern Illinois Railroad

Chicago & Illinois Midland Railway

Chicago & North Western Railway

Chicago, St. Paul, Minneapolis & Omaha Railway

Chicago & Western Indiana Railroad

Chicago, Attica & Southern Railroad

Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad

Chicago, Great Western Railway

Chicago, Indianapolis & Louisville Railway

Chicago, Milwaukee, St. Paul & Pacific Railroad

Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway

Peoria Terminal Co.

Clinchfield Railroad

Colorado & Southern Railway

Columbus & Greenville Railway

Delaware & Hudson Railroad Čorp.

Greenwich & Johnsonville Railway

Delaware, Lackawanna & Western Railroad

Denver & Rio Grande Western Railroad

Denver & Salt Lake Railway

Detroit & Mackinac Railway

Detroit & Toledo Shore Line Railroad

Detroit, Toledo & Ironton Railroad

Duluth, Missabe & Iron Range Railway

Duluth, South Shore & Atlantic Railway
Mineral Range Railroad

Elgin, Joliet & Eastern Railway

Erie Railroad

New Jersey & New York Railroad

Florida Fast Coast Railway

Fort Dodge, Des Moines & Southern Railway

Fort Worth & Denver City Railway

Galveston, Houston & Henderson Railroad
Georgia Railroad

Georgia & Florida Railroad

Great Northern Railway

Green Bay & Western Railroad

Gulf, Mobile & Ohio Railroad

Huntingdon & Broad Top Mountain Railroad & Coal Co. Illinois Central Railroad

Yazoo & Mississippi Valley Railroad

Gulf & Ship Island Railroad

Illinois Terminal Railroad

Indianapolis Union Railway

Kansas City, Mexico & Orient Railway of Mexico

Kansas City Southern Railway

Arkansas Western Railway

Kentucky & Indiana Terminal Railroad

Lake Superior & Ishpeming Railroad

Lehigh & Hudson River Railway

Lehigh & New England Railroad

Lehigh Valley Railroad!

Louisiana & Arkansas Railway

Louisville & Nashville Railroad
McCloud River Railroad

Maine Central Railroad

Midland Valley Railroad

Kansas, Oklahoma & Gulf Railway
Oklahoma City-Ada-Atoka Railway

Minneapolis & St. Louis Railway

Minneapolis, St. Paul & Sault Ste. Marie Railroad
Includes Wisconsin Central Railway

Mississippi Central Railroad

Missouri-Kansas-Texas Railroad
Includes-

Missouri-Kansas-Texas Railroad Co. of Texas
Beaver, Meade & Englewood Railroad

Missouri Pacific Railroad

Doniphan, Kensett & Searcy Railway
New Orleans & Lower Coast Railroad
Natchez & Southern Railway

Gulf Coast Lines:

New Orleans, Texas & Mexico Railway
St. Louis, Brownsville & Mexico Railway
San Antonio, Uvalde & Gulf Railroad
Beaumont, Sour Lake & Western Railway
International-Great Northern Railroad
Missouri Pacific Railroad Corp. in Nebraska
Missouri-Illinois Railroad

Montour Railroad.

Nashville, Chattanooga & St. Louis Railway
Includes Western & Atlantic Railroad

National Railways of Mexico

Nevada Northern Railway

New York Central Railroad

Chicago River & Indiana Railroad

Indiana Harbor Belt Railroad

Pittsburgh & Lake Erie Railroad

New York, Chicago & St. Louis Railroad
New York, New Haven & Hartford Railroad
New York, Susquehanna & Western Railroad

Norfolk & Western Railway

Norfolk Southern Railway

Northern Pacific Railway

Northwestern Pacific Railroad

Pennsylvania Railroad

Pennsylvania & Atlantic Railroad

Rosslyn Connecting Railroad

Waynesburg & Washington Railroad
Baltimore & Eastern Railroad

Long Island Railroad

Pennsylvania-Reading Seashore Lines

[blocks in formation]

St. Louis Southwestern Railway of Texas
Dallas Terminal Railway & Union Depot Co.

San Diego & Arizona Eastern Railway

Savannah & Atlanta Railway

Seaboard Air Line Railway

Southern Pacific Co.

Texas & New Orleans Railroad Southern Pacific Railroad of Mexico

Southern Railway

Alabama Great Southern Railroad
Blue Ridge Railway

Carolina & Northwestern Railway

Cincinnati, Burnside & Cumberland River Railway
Cincinnati, New Orleans & Texas Pacific Railway

Danville & Western Railway

Georgia Southern & Florida Railway

Harriman & Northeastern Railroad

High Point, Randleman, Asheboro & Southern Railroad
New Orleans & Northeastern Railroad

New Orleans Terminal Co.

St. Johns River Terminal Co.

State University Railroad

Woodstock & Blocton Railway
Yadkin Railroad

Spokane International Railroad

Spokane, Portland & Seattle Railway

Temiskaming & Northern Ontario Railway Commission

Includes Nipissing Central Railway.

Tennessee, Alabama & Georgia Railway

Tennessee Central Railway

Terminal Railroad Association of St. Louis

Texas & Pacific Railway

Texas Mexican Railway

Toronto, Hamilton & Buffalo Railway

Tremont & Gulf Railway

Union Pacific Railroad

Union Railway (Memphis)

Union Railroad (Pittsburgh)
Virginian Railway
Wabash Railroad

Western Maryland Railway

Western Pacific Railroad

Western Railway of Alabama

Atlanta & West Point Rail Road

Wheeling & Lake Erie Railway

Wichita Valley Railway

Winston-Salem Southbound Railway

Youngstown & Southern Railway

EXHIBIT B

EFFECT OF WAGE CHANGES ON HIGHER WAGE BRACKETS IN THE RAILROAD INDUSTRY, 1939-43

Establishment of a minimum wage of 25 cents in the railroad industry in October 1938, and of 30 cents in October 1939, had no great effect upon the rates of pay for job classifications above those respective minimums, as there already existed at that time a substantial differential between the lower common labor rates and the skilled labor rates.

The mediated settlement of December 1, 1941, however, established a general minimum rate of 46 cents. The increase of 10 cents per hour (over the statutor rate of 36 cents) was effective for all job classifications from the minimum up to the highest rates, except that the train and engine service forces (who are amon the higher paid classes) received 92 cents per hour. Thus much the sam increase was made in all rates, from the bottom up, and differentials were preserved, or very nearly preserved, at the insistence of the railroad labor organizations.

Much the same procedure was followed in 1943. The mediated settlement of December 27 of that year provided in increase of 11 cents in the minimum ra' All job classifications with hourly rates of 47 cents but less than 57 cents wer increased 10 cents per hour; while all job classifications with hourly rates of 57 cents or more were increased 9 cents per hour. In this case, the differentials wer slightly reduced by reason of the fact that the lower rated classes received slight greater increases per hour. However, all wage groups involved received a increase closely paralleling that agreed upon for the lowest or minimum wage

group.

EXHIBIT C.-Average straight-time rate of pay per hour-Selected classes of railroad employees: Railways of class I in the United States, year 1944

[merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][ocr errors][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][ocr errors][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small]

1 The rates indicated are average straight-time rates and not minimum rates. They are stated in c per hour.

Senator TUNNELL. Mr. Taylor.

TESTIMONY OF TYRE TAYLOR, GENERAL COUNSEL, SOUTHER STATES INDUSTRIAL COUNCIL

Mr. TAYLOR. I appear on behalf of the Southern States Industru Council, the headquarters of which are in the Stahlman Buildi. Nashville, Tenn. My address is 712 Jackson Place, Washington.

Established in 1933, the council's membership is comprised business concerns in the 16 southern States from Maryland to Texa

and including West Virginia, Missouri, and Oklahoma. This membership includes all lines of manufacturing and processing, mining, transportation, and related industries and accounts for substantial employment throughout the area.

You already have in your report data on the effect of the proposed minima upon costs and prices in the case of three of the South's largest industries-cotton textiles, lumber, and tobacco. I shall not go into this except to offer for the record certain information which, in the case of cotton textiles, may serve to supplement the data already before you and, in the case of lumber, we have some estimates of what the proposed increases would do to the price of furniture. Senator ELLENDER. I don't recall having any testimony from the lumber industry.

Senator TUNNELL. I don't think we have had any.

(A statement from the Southern Pine Industry appears in the Appendix.)

Mr. TAYLOR. Wasn't the table put in the record?

Senator ELLENDER. There may have been some data put into the record.

Mr. TAYLOR. The increase in costs which would result from 65 cents, 70 cents, and 75 cents. Didn't you put that in the record?

Senator ELLENDER. What I had in mind was that we did not have any witnesses. Of course, I think it is imperative that we do have some testimony from the lumber industry.

Mr. TAYLOR. I think this did go in [indicating document].

Senator ELLENDER. Yes, I remember putting that in myself. That was to show that an increase in wages would increase the cost of lumber.

Mr. TAYLOR. Except for this and except for two recommendations in which we should like to join with the Cotton Textile Institute-we wish to confine ourselves to certain aspects of the problem which, so far as I know, have not been discussed and some, if not all of which, involve important considerations of public policy. For example, the effect of the proposed legislation upon small business.

Impact upon small business: The South of course has many large nationally and internationally known industrial establishments. However, as the House Committee on Small Business found after an exhaustive survey of the wartime problems of Southern industry in 1942-43, the overwhelming majority of our plants and companies are comparatively small. And suitably qualified-omitting, for example, financial concerns and some types of industry where the investment or volume of turn-over per worker is extremely high-the number of -mployees indicates the relative resources of a business enterprise. We do not have comparative figures for any particular section of the country, but for the Nation as a whole we find that average earnngs per job by size of firm are substantially larger for the big firms than the small ones. Thus for the period. 1939-43, such averages for period.1939-43, third quarter earnings were as follows:

I might say, gentlemen, that while that is something I have been convinced about in my own mind for a long time, and something about which I think the committee might take judicial notice, it is wfully difficult, or I found it so, to obtain any very satisfactory statistics for that. There seems to be a great dearth of data on this subject of earnings by size of a firm, not only for the country as a

« iepriekšējāTurpināt »