Decisions of the Commissioner of Patents and of the United States Courts in Patent and Trade-mark and Copyright CasesU.S. Government Printing Office, 1937 "Compiled from Official gazette. Beginning with 1876, the volumes have included also decisions of United States courts, decisions of Secretary of Interior, opinions of Attorney-General, and important decisions of state courts in relation to patents, trade-marks, etc. 1869-94, not in Congressional set." Checklist of U. S. public documents, 1789-1909, p. 530. |
No grāmatas satura
1.5. rezultāts no 100.
7. lappuse
... substantially identi- cal mark . In that case again will be found dicta broadly support- ing petitioner's contention here . What the court actually decided , however , was that the mark had been properly cancelled because of ...
... substantially identi- cal mark . In that case again will be found dicta broadly support- ing petitioner's contention here . What the court actually decided , however , was that the mark had been properly cancelled because of ...
58. lappuse
... substantially lessen the likelihood of confusion ; that registrations alleged by the respondent of marks issued to third persons , said to contain certain of the features common to the involved marks , could not be con- sidered ; that ...
... substantially lessen the likelihood of confusion ; that registrations alleged by the respondent of marks issued to third persons , said to contain certain of the features common to the involved marks , could not be con- sidered ; that ...
73. lappuse
... Substantially the same question was involved in our decision of the case of In re McKee , 23 C. C. P. A. ( Patents ) , post 438 ( Patent Appeal No. 3534 ) , decided concurrently herewith . In In re Ernst et al . , 21 C. C. P. A. ...
... Substantially the same question was involved in our decision of the case of In re McKee , 23 C. C. P. A. ( Patents ) , post 438 ( Patent Appeal No. 3534 ) , decided concurrently herewith . In In re Ernst et al . , 21 C. C. P. A. ...
76. lappuse
... substantially open well casing at a pre- determined point intermediate its upper and lower ends ; second , opening , by fluid pressure from the top of the well , normally closed ports located in said casing above said predetermined ...
... substantially open well casing at a pre- determined point intermediate its upper and lower ends ; second , opening , by fluid pressure from the top of the well , normally closed ports located in said casing above said predetermined ...
77. lappuse
... substantially the same subject - matter as that defined in cancelled claim 23 , appellant was estopped from presenting them in the in- volved application . The board rejected appealed claim 6 on the ground that it contained new matter ...
... substantially the same subject - matter as that defined in cancelled claim 23 , appellant was estopped from presenting them in the in- volved application . The board rejected appealed claim 6 on the ground that it contained new matter ...
Citi izdevumi - Skatīt visu
Bieži izmantoti vārdi un frāzes
18 C. C. P. A. Patents alleged amended APPEAL from Patent appealed claims appellant appellant's application appellee appellee's Associate Judges blade Board of Appeals cancelled chamber cited Commissioner of Patents Company confusing similarity containing contention counsel for appellant counts Court of Customs Customs and Patent delivered the opinion descriptive properties device disclosed disclosure divisional application entitled estoppel Examiner of Interferences fabric fact filed GARRETT GRAHAM HATFIELD heat held interference proceeding issue LENROOT machine mark material means metal method Miller of counsel operation opposition proceeding Oral argument parties Patent Appeals Patent Office petitioner plug portion Presiding Judge prior art priority proceeding question R. F. Whitehead Howard record reducing reduction to practice references registration reissue reissue application rule Serial shaft shown specification statute structure subject matter substantially temperature testimony thereof tion trade-mark Trade-Mark Act tube United States Court United States Patent unpatentable valve Vitamin-D
Populāri fragmenti
44. lappuse - It is a finality as to the claim or demand in controversy, concluding parties and those In privity with them, not only as to every matter which was offered and received to sustain or defeat the claim or demand, but as to any other admissible matter which might have been offered for that purpose.
96. lappuse - ... (b) the invention was patented or described in a printed publication in this or a foreign country or in public use or on sale in this country, more than one year prior to the date of the...
24. lappuse - ... (b) Similar proceedings may be had and taken where an action, suit, or proceeding brought by or against an officer of a State, or of a county, city, or other governmental agency...
659. lappuse - It shall be the duty of all patentees, and their assigns and legal representatives, and of all persons making or vending any patented article for or under them, to give sufficient notice to the public that the same is patented ; either by fixing thereon the word
4. lappuse - If it appear after a hearing before the examiner that the registrant was not entitled to the use of the mark at the date of his application for registration thereof, or that the mark is not used by the registrant, or has been abandoned, and the examiner shall so decide, the Commissioner shall cancel the registration. Appeal may be taken to the Commissioner in person from the decision of examiner of interferences.
36. lappuse - ... of the registration of a trade-mark, is dissatisfied with the decision of the Commissioner of Patents, he may appeal to the court of appeals of the District of Columbia, on complying with the conditions required in case of an appeal from the decision of the commissioner by an applicant for patent, or a party to an interference as to an invention, and the same rules of practice and procedure shall govern in every stage of such proceedings, as far as the same may be applicable.
142. lappuse - ... trade-mark or trade name as to be likely to cause confusion or mistake in the minds of the public or to deceive purchasers, shall be deemed to copy or simulate such protected trade-mark or trade name.
188. lappuse - That trademarks which are identical with a registered or known trademark owned and in use by another, and appropriated to merchandise of the same descriptive properties, or which so nearly resemble a registered or known trademark owned and in use by another, and appropriated to merchandise of the same descriptive properties, as to be likely to cause confusion or mistake in the mind of the public, or to deceive purchasers, shall not be registered...
593. lappuse - ... in a summary way, on the evidence produced before the Commissioner...
103. lappuse - ... owned by another and appropriated to the same class of merchandise, or which so nearly resembles some other person's lawful trade-mark as to be likely to cause confusion in the mind of the public or to deceive purchasers.