Lapas attēli
PDF
ePub

1908 Tate v. Fullbrook

Ct. App.

L. J. Vaughan
Williams,

L. R. [1908] 1
K. B. 821

208 U. S. 260

Writer of dialogue sole author of musical sketch in England, 176

1908 United Dictionary U. S. Sup. Ct. J. Holmes,

Co. v. Merriam

Omission of notice on foreign-made edition sold only for use
there does not vitiate Amer. copyright, 134

1908 Dam v. Kirke La U. S. C. C. J. Hazel,

Shelle Co.

166 F. R. 589

[blocks in formation]

Citizen of an unproclaimed country cannot indirectly obtain
American copyright, 110

1909 Bosselman v. Rich- U. S. C. C. J. Ward,

ardson

App.

174 F. R. 622

[blocks in formation]

Peary letters - copyright in newspaper letter as book upheld, 103

[blocks in formation]
[blocks in formation]

Error in classification does not invalidate copyright, 136 1909 Harper v. Kalem U.S. C. C. App. J. Ward,

169 F. R. 61

Moving pictures may infringe book copyright, 176, 242; both speech and action not necessary in dramatic performances, 176; illustrations as such do not infringe book copyright, 237 1909 Heinemann v. Smart Chancery J. Parker, Times, Jl. 15, '09 Set Pub. Co.

Innocent publisher responsible for acts beyond authority given
to literary agent, 437

[blocks in formation]

Printed drama not subject to manufacturing provisions as
"book," 155, 168

1909 Hunter v. Clifford West. Co. Ct. J. Lush,

169 F. R. 978

Times N.12. '09

Ct. App.

L. J. Vaughan
Williams,

100 L. T. 260

Right to copyright lapsed on work of art sold without registration, 247 1909 Karno v. Pathé Frères Exhibitor, not manufacturer of film, responsible party, 177 U.S. C. C. App. J. Buffington,

174 F. R. 135

License to perform does not imply authority to copyright, 107
L. C. J. Farwell, Times My. 19,

1909 Saake v. Lederer

1909 Scholz v. Amasis

Ct. App.

[ocr errors][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small]

J. McPherson,

182 F. R. 150

Following decision in lower court 1910 De Jonge v. Breuk- U. S. C. C. er & Kessler Artistic designs for cover paper copyrightable, 237; separable designs must have separate copyright notices, 242; subject cannot be protected both under copyright and trade-mark acts, 237

1910 Eliot & Collier v. N. Y. Sup. Ct. J. Newburger, Jones, et al.

120 N. Y Supp. 989

[blocks in formation]
[blocks in formation]

Whole work enjoined where infringing parts were inseparable, 258

1910 Press Assoc. v. Re- Chancery

porting Agency

J. Warrington, Times D. 8, '10

Election returns protected against "unfair competition," 89

1910 Record & Guide Co. U. S. C. C.

J. McPherson,

175 F. R. 156

v. Bromley
Omission of date vitiates copyright notice though given on same
page, 128; substitution of name in copyright notice without
authority of law voids copyright, 136

[blocks in formation]

One copyright notice suffices to cover earlier copyrights of parts,
132; list made to run down cases permissible, but extensive
copying from digest an infringement, 259

1910 White-Smith v. U. S. C. C. J. Brown,

Goff

180 F. R. 256

[blocks in formation]

INDEX

« iepriekšējāTurpināt »