Decisions of the Commissioner of Patents and of the United States Courts in Patent and Trade-mark and Copyright CasesU.S. Government Printing Office, 1962 "Compiled from Official gazette. Beginning with 1876, the volumes have included also decisions of United States courts, decisions of Secretary of Interior, opinions of Attorney-General, and important decisions of state courts in relation to patents, trade-marks, etc. 1869-94, not in Congressional set." Checklist of U. S. public documents, 1789-1909, p. 530. |
No grāmatas satura
1.5. rezultāts no 100.
xxi. lappuse
... practice in carrying out that law is to require the design disclosure to depict the configuration and complete appearance [ of ] an article of manufacture in which the design is embodied . " 2. Same Same Same - BouNDS OF ARTICLE ...
... practice in carrying out that law is to require the design disclosure to depict the configuration and complete appearance [ of ] an article of manufacture in which the design is embodied . " 2. Same Same Same - BouNDS OF ARTICLE ...
3. lappuse
... practice in carrying out that law is to require the design disclosure to depict the configuration and com- plete appearance on an article of manufacture in which the design is embodied . [ 2 ] The complete appearance of an article of ...
... practice in carrying out that law is to require the design disclosure to depict the configuration and com- plete appearance on an article of manufacture in which the design is embodied . [ 2 ] The complete appearance of an article of ...
22. lappuse
... Practice in Trademark Cases , Rule 2.85 ; section 30 of the Trademark Act of 1946 ( 15 U.S.C. 1112 ) . [ 3 ] It is a matter of common knowledge that electric drink blenders and the reference registration goods are used as " bar ...
... Practice in Trademark Cases , Rule 2.85 ; section 30 of the Trademark Act of 1946 ( 15 U.S.C. 1112 ) . [ 3 ] It is a matter of common knowledge that electric drink blenders and the reference registration goods are used as " bar ...
28. lappuse
... Practice in Patent Cases ) . [ 1 ] The Rules further provide that the junior party have a definite period during which he may adduce evidence to prove and support his claim to priority of invention . The senior party then is allotted a ...
... Practice in Patent Cases ) . [ 1 ] The Rules further provide that the junior party have a definite period during which he may adduce evidence to prove and support his claim to priority of invention . The senior party then is allotted a ...
29. lappuse
... Practice as noted in the foregoing . " The junior party Robitschek then petitioned from the refusal to grant the extension of time . The First Assistant Commissioner in affirming the Patent Interference Examiner's ruling said : " No ...
... Practice as noted in the foregoing . " The junior party Robitschek then petitioned from the refusal to grant the extension of time . The First Assistant Commissioner in affirming the Patent Interference Examiner's ruling said : " No ...
Citi izdevumi - Skatīt visu
Bieži izmantoti vārdi un frāzes
49 CCPA affidavit affirmed alleged ammonia appealed claims appellant appellant's appellee applicant's application entitled aryl assignment Board of Appeals Chief Judge ciate Judges claimed compounds Clarence W conductor considered Court of Customs Customs and Patent cycloserine deception of purchasers decision delivered the opinion device dextran disclosed disclosure effect election Emphasis evidence Examiner Examiner's rejection fact filing date held Hession indicate interference interference proceeding invention issue Judge WILLIAM Lanham Act likelihood of confusion mark material means metal mistake or deception neomycin obvious opposer's ordinary skill Patent Appeals Patent Office portion position Principal Register prior art priority reason recited record reduction to practice reference registration rejection of claims relied result riboflavin Rule section 2(d Serial specification structure subject matter sudsy supra surface thereof tion trademark U.S. Court United States Senior unobvious unpatentable USPQ utility word WORLEY Ziherl
Populāri fragmenti
456. lappuse - A patent may not be obtained though the invention is not identically disclosed or described as set forth in section 102 of this title, if the differences between the subject matter sought to be patented and the prior art are such that the subject matter as a whole would have been obvious at the time the invention was made to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which said subject matter pertains.
262. lappuse - ... would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art at the time it was made.
389. lappuse - ... shall be assignable with the good will of the business in which the mark is used, or with that part of the goodwill of the business connected with the use of and symbolized by the mark...
457. lappuse - Co-operative action of discrete agencies such that the total effect is greater than the sum of the two effects taken independently.
20. lappuse - ... the invention was patented or described in a printed publication in this or a foreign country or in public use or on sale in this country, more than one year prior to the date of the application for patent in the United States, or c.
133. lappuse - The signature of an attorney constitutes a certificate by him that he has read the pleading; that to the best of his knowledge, information, and belief there is good ground to support it; and that it is not interposed for delay.
249. lappuse - Now that it has succeeded, It may seem very plain to any one that he could have done It as well. , This is often the case with Inventions of the greatest merit. It may be laid down as a general rule, though perhaps not an invariable one, that. If a new combination and arrangement of known elements produce a new and beneficial result never attained before, it is evidence of invention.
101. lappuse - To the extent necessary to decision and when presented, the reviewing court shall decide all relevant questions of law, interpret constitutional and statutory provisions, and determine the meaning or applicability of the terms of an agency action.
672. lappuse - He may begin at the point where his invention begins, and describe what he has made that is new, and what it replaces of the old. That which is common and well known is as if it were written out in the patent and delineated in the drawings.
25. lappuse - That no evidence, statement, or declaration, touching the matter at issue, will be considered upon the said day of hearing, which shall not have been taken and filed in compliance with these rules...