Decisions of the Commissioner of Patents and of the United States Courts in Patent and Trade-mark and Copyright CasesU.S. Government Printing Office, 1874 "Compiled from Official gazette. Beginning with 1876, the volumes have included also decisions of United States courts, decisions of Secretary of Interior, opinions of Attorney-General, and important decisions of state courts in relation to patents, trade-marks, etc. 1869-94, not in Congressional set." Checklist of U. S. public documents, 1789-1909, p. 530. |
Saturs
| 137 | |
| 138 | |
| 144 | |
| 150 | |
| 151 | |
| 154 | |
| 158 | |
| 162 | |
| 45 | |
| 46 | |
| 50 | |
| 73 | |
| 77 | |
| 81 | |
| 84 | |
| 92 | |
| 99 | |
| 101 | |
| 116 | |
| 118 | |
| 119 | |
| 129 | |
| 176 | |
| 179 | |
| 203 | |
| 204 | |
| 205 | |
| 206 | |
| 207 | |
| 208 | |
| 209 | |
| 210 | |
| 211 | |
| 212 | |
| 213 | |
| 214 | |
Citi izdevumi - Skatīt visu
Bieži izmantoti vārdi un frāzes
abandonment Acting Commissioner adapted alleged invention amendment American Sardines antiseptic apparatus APPEAL applicant's article of manufacture assignment BOARD OF EXAMINERS-IN-CHIEF bobbins collar Collender combination connection constitute construction court cover Decided decision design patent device disclaimed drawing embodied embraced employed evidence Examiner of Interferences Exhibit extension fabric fact favor February February 21 filed fire-place stove Gahr Galusha groove held Hemingray HENRY H independent issue January 11 Jenkins Joinder joint inventors LEGGETT LETTERS PATENT Linus Yale machine MARCH 29 Masury MATTER Mayall mechanical patent ment metal motion novelty objection October 20 Office operation original patent parties PATENT FOR IMPROVEMENT pivot present PRIMARY EXAMINER prior inventor priority of invention produced proof proper purpose question reference refused reissued patent rejected remuneration result rule S. B. Sexton second claim section 32 shown shows specification statement subject-matter sufficient surface testimony THACHER tion trade-mark wood words
Populāri fragmenti
156. lappuse - When an application is adjudged to interfere with a part only of another pending application, the interfering parties will be permitted to see or obtain copies of so much only of the specifications as refers to the interfering claims. And either party may, if he so elect, withdraw from his application the claims adjudged not to interfere, and file a new application therefor.
164. lappuse - recent enactment " referred to in Seymour v. Osborne is found in § 53 of the act of July 8th, 1870, in these words : " but no new matter shall be introduced into the specification, nor in case of a machine patent shall the model or drawings be amended, except each by the other ; but when there is neither model nor drawing, amendments may be made upon proof satisfactory to the commissioner that such new matter or amendment was a part of the original invention, Opinion of the Court. and was omitted...
6. lappuse - The specifications and claim in every such case shall be subject to revision and restriction in the same manner as original applications are.
136. lappuse - There are but two heads under which either invention here shown can be comprehendedan improvement in an 'art' or in a 'manufacture.' Each invention must clearly appear to be one or the other. There is no middle ground, such as the use of a thing, upon which a claim can rest. Every claim must be so drawn as to plainly indicate what kind of invention is sought to be covered, whether an improvement in an 'art' or in a 'manufacture,' whether a process or a product.
32. lappuse - Fiske, 2 Mason, CC 112; Wyeth et al. v. Stone et al. 1 Story, 273. Those here are of that character, being all connected with the use of the improvements in the steam-engine, as applied to propel carriages or vessels, and may, therefore, be united in one instrument.
138. lappuse - Motions to dissolve an interference may be brought on the ground (1) that no interference in fact exists, (2) that there has been such irregularity in declaring the same as will preclude a proper determination of the interference, or (3) that an applicant's mark is not registrable.
167. lappuse - Davis, is a contract and, like all other contracts, is to be construed so as to carry out the intention of the parties to it...
28. lappuse - ... unless it be shown to the satisfaction of the Commissioner that such crediting constituted payment of the dividend to the shareholder within the taxable year.
97. lappuse - But to obtain more revenue, the public officers have generally declined to issue letters for more than one patent described in them.
170. lappuse - Unless it appears to your satisfaction that such machine was actually used as a seed sower, in sowing seed for agricultural purposes, you are warranted in presuming that it was a mere experiment; and if so, you are instructed that it would not invalidate the plaintiff's patent, provided Cahoon was an original inventor of his improvements, without knowledge of that machine, and did not derive any of them from Luce.