United States Supreme Court Reports, 82. sējumsLawyers Co-operative Publishing Company, 1986 First series, books 1-43, includes "Notes on U.S. reports" by Walter Malins Rose. |
No grāmatas satura
1.–3. rezultāts no 87.
344. lappuse
... imposed by a jury . And the purposes of the death penalty are not frustrated by , or inconsistent with , a scheme in which imposition of the penalty is determined by a judge . The fact that the majority of jurisdictions with capital ...
... imposed by a jury . And the purposes of the death penalty are not frustrated by , or inconsistent with , a scheme in which imposition of the penalty is determined by a judge . The fact that the majority of jurisdictions with capital ...
353. lappuse
... imposed by a jury . While it is to be hoped that current procedures have greatly reduced the risk that jury sentencing will result in arbitrary or discriminatory appli- cation of the death penalty , see Gregg v Georgia , 428 US , at 190 ...
... imposed by a jury . While it is to be hoped that current procedures have greatly reduced the risk that jury sentencing will result in arbitrary or discriminatory appli- cation of the death penalty , see Gregg v Georgia , 428 US , at 190 ...
494. lappuse
... imposed by § 474 therefore applies only when a photographic reproduction fails to meet the re- quirements imposed by § 504. Thus , if the restrictions imposed by § 504 [ 468 US 648 ] sufficiently accommodate Time's First Amendment ...
... imposed by § 474 therefore applies only when a photographic reproduction fails to meet the re- quirements imposed by § 504. Thus , if the restrictions imposed by § 504 [ 468 US 648 ] sufficiently accommodate Time's First Amendment ...
Citi izdevumi - Skatīt visu
Bieži izmantoti vārdi un frāzes
20 USCS 42 USCS 82 L Ed 96 S Ct affirmed agents alleged appellee applied argued authority banks beeper Blackmun Board Brennan broadcasting certiorari challenge Civil Rights claim Clause commercial paper concurring conduct Congress constitutional conviction Court of Appeals criminal decision defendant discrimination dissenting District Court double jeopardy due process evidence exclusionary rule exemption F Supp federal Fifth Amendment football Fourteenth Amendment Fourth Amendment Glass-Steagall Act Government grand jury grandfather clause handicapped held illegal imposed interest issue Jaycees judge judgment judicial Justice L Ed 2d legislative lesser included offense ment NCAA offense officers Ohio Ops 2d opinion person petitioners plaintiffs police Powell prison procedures prohibition protection purposes racially reasonable regulation Rehnquist requirement respondents restrictions schools Search and Seizure securities sentence Service sion Stat statutory Stevens supra Supreme Court television tion tional tive trial United USCS violation