The Federal ReporterWest Publishing Company, 1952 |
No grāmatas satura
1.–3. rezultāts no 75.
263. lappuse
... ground of excessive and unreasonable salaries , question for Court of Appeals is whether tax court finding was sustained by substantial evidence or whether it is clearly erroneous . 26 U.S.C.A. § 23 ( a ) ( 1 ) ( A ) . 2. Internal ...
... ground of excessive and unreasonable salaries , question for Court of Appeals is whether tax court finding was sustained by substantial evidence or whether it is clearly erroneous . 26 U.S.C.A. § 23 ( a ) ( 1 ) ( A ) . 2. Internal ...
269. lappuse
... ground that it furnished no justification for vacating the sentence . On March 23 , 1950 , the defendant's motion was heard and denied . Whether he was represented by counsel at the hearing , the record does not show . On February 7 ...
... ground that it furnished no justification for vacating the sentence . On March 23 , 1950 , the defendant's motion was heard and denied . Whether he was represented by counsel at the hearing , the record does not show . On February 7 ...
569. lappuse
... ground that plaintiffs had breached the contract . The District Court for the District of Colorado , William Lee Knous , J. , entered judgment for plaintiffs , and defendants appealed . The Court of Ap- peals , Murrah , Circuit Judge ...
... ground that plaintiffs had breached the contract . The District Court for the District of Colorado , William Lee Knous , J. , entered judgment for plaintiffs , and defendants appealed . The Court of Ap- peals , Murrah , Circuit Judge ...
Citi izdevumi - Skatīt visu
Bieži izmantoti vārdi un frāzes
action affirmed Air Freight alleged amended amount appellant appellant's appellee application Aruba Asst automobile Board cause certiorari charge Chief Judge Circuit Judge Cite as 197 City Civil claim Commission Commissioner Company complaint contract Corp corporation counsel Court of Appeals damages decision defendant defendant's denied dismissed District Court Elekta employees evidence F.Supp fact Federal filed finding granted held income insured interest Internal Revenue issue judgment June June 25 jurisdiction jury KEY NUMBER SYSTEM L.Ed Lanham Act lease liability ment motion negligence operation opinion parties patent payment pen points petition petitioner plaintiff prior prior art proceeding purchase question reasonable record rule S.Ct Section Stat statute suit supra taxpayer testimony tion trade-mark trial court U. S. Atty Union United States Attorney United States Court United States District verdict violation Washington York York City