The Rise of Modern Judicial Review: From Judicial Interpretation to Judge-Made LawRowman & Littlefield Publishers, 1994. gada 29. marts - 420 lappuses This major history of judicial review, revised to include the Rehnquist court, shows how modern courts have used their power to create new "rights with fateful political consequences." Originally published by Basic Books. |
No grāmatas satura
1.–5. rezultāts no 32.
6. lappuse
... rights of defendants in various Bill of Rights provisions , and the Fourteenth Amendment equal - protection clause became the weapons in the new judi- cial enterprise . Post - 1937 constitutional interpretation and judicial review were ...
... rights of defendants in various Bill of Rights provisions , and the Fourteenth Amendment equal - protection clause became the weapons in the new judi- cial enterprise . Post - 1937 constitutional interpretation and judicial review were ...
27. lappuse
... Bill of Rights ) . The defenders of the Constitution denied the need for a bill of rights by arguing that the powers given were not to be extended by remote implications , since otherwise the power of Congress to abridge freedom of the ...
... Bill of Rights ) . The defenders of the Constitution denied the need for a bill of rights by arguing that the powers given were not to be extended by remote implications , since otherwise the power of Congress to abridge freedom of the ...
44. lappuse
... Bill of Rights ) does not apply to the states by noting the character of the U.S. Constitution : " The constitution was ordained and established by the people of the United States for themselves , for their own government and not for ...
... Bill of Rights ) does not apply to the states by noting the character of the U.S. Constitution : " The constitution was ordained and established by the people of the United States for themselves , for their own government and not for ...
68. lappuse
... Bill of Rights applied only to the national government ? It is certainly true that Taney handed down important decisions that more often than Marshall's upheld the asserted interests of the states . But if that was Taney's primary ...
... Bill of Rights applied only to the national government ? It is certainly true that Taney handed down important decisions that more often than Marshall's upheld the asserted interests of the states . But if that was Taney's primary ...
73. lappuse
... Rights Bill of 1964 , and the House Judiciary Committee debate over the grounds for impeach- ment in the Watergate affair . ) Yet constitutional interpretation is at the heart of or , as I shall eventually argue , was at the heart of ...
... Rights Bill of 1964 , and the House Judiciary Committee debate over the grounds for impeach- ment in the Watergate affair . ) Yet constitutional interpretation is at the heart of or , as I shall eventually argue , was at the heart of ...
Citi izdevumi - Skatīt visu
The Rise of Modern Judicial Review: From Constitutional Interpretation to ... Christopher Wolfe Ierobežota priekšskatīšana - 1994 |
Bieži izmantoti vārdi un frāzes
American applied approach argued argument basis Bill of Rights broad Burger Court Cardozo Choper clear and present commerce clause Congress consti constitutional interpretation constitutional law constitutional provisions constitutionality context contract clause debate decisions defendants dissent doctrine Dred Scott due process clause economic effect enforce equal protection established establishment clause example exercise fact federal Federalist Fifth Amendment Fourteenth Amendment framers fundamental grounds guarantee Hamilton Holmes Ibid important intent interest interpretation and judicial interpretivism interstate commerce involved issue judges judicial activism judicial power judiciary Justice laissez-faire legislature liberty limits Madison majority Marbury Marshall Marshall's meaning ment modern judicial review nature opinion particular political present danger principles prohibition question reasonable regulation rules of interpretation separation of powers simply standard statute substantive due process Supreme Court theory tion tional traditional tution unconstitutional upheld violated vote Warren Court Wheaton words