...that an applicant must demonstrate tangible benefits is asking too much, it is not too much to ask that there be ground for reasonable expectation that competition may have some beneficial effect. Merely to assume that competition is bound to be of advantage, in an industry so regulated and so largely...

...that an applicant must demonstrate tangible benefits is asking too much, it is not too much to ask that there be ground for reasonable expectation that competition may have some beneficial effect. Merely to assume that competition is bound to be of advantage, in an industry so regulated and so largely...

...could minimize this added cost, it would have an additional advantage over the voice/record carriers. As stated by the US Supreme Court, prior to authorizing...support for the agency's inferences of ultimate fact." 3 In the instant case, we submit that there is no basis to conclude on the present record that competition...

...that an applicant must demonstrate tangible benefits is asking too much, it is not too much to ask that there be ground for reasonable expectation that competition may have some beneficial effect. Merely to assume that competition is bound to be of advantage, in an industry so regulated and so largely...

...that an applicant must demonstrate tangible benefits is asking too much, it is not too much to ask that there be ground for reasonable expectation that competition may have some beneficial effect. Id. at 96-7. 54. The United States Court of Appeals set forth the Commission's duty in affirming the...

...that an applicant must demonstrate tangible benefits is asking too much, it is not too much to ask that there be ground for reasonable expectation that competition may have some benelicial effect. Merely to assume that competition is bound to be of advantage, in an industry so...