What Roe V. Wade Should Have Said: The Nation's Top Legal Experts Rewrite America's Most Controversial DecisionJ. M. Balkin NYU Press, 2005 - 288 lappuses Constitutional scholars rewrite the landmark decision |
Saturs
An Engine of Controversy | 3 |
Balkin judgment of the Court | 31 |
Reva B Siegel concurring | 63 |
Mark Tushnet concurring | 86 |
Allen concurring in the judgment | 92 |
Jed Rubenfeld concurring in the judgment except as to Doe | 109 |
Robin West concurring in the judgment | 121 |
Cass R Sunstein concurring in the judgment | 148 |
Jeffrey Rosen dissenting | 170 |
Teresa Stanton Collett dissenting | 187 |
Michael Stokes Paulsen dissenting | 196 |
Comments from the Contributors | 230 |
The Constitution of the United States of America | 261 |
About the Contributors | 275 |
Citi izdevumi - Skatīt visu
What Roe V. Wade Should Have Said: The Nation's Top Legal Experts Rewrite ... Jack M Balkin Ierobežota priekšskatīšana - 2023 |
What Roe V. Wade Should Have Said: The Nation's Top Legal Experts Rewrite ... Jack M. Balkin Ierobežota priekšskatīšana - 2023 |
What Roe v. Wade Should Have Said: The Nation's Top Legal Experts Rewrite ... Jack M. Balkin Ierobežota priekšskatīšana - 2023 |