Chemical Patentability and the ChemistUniversity of Wisconsin, 1978 - 312 lappuses |
No grāmatas satura
1.–3. rezultāts no 37.
65. lappuse
... utility " is the only requirement that is not defined , at least by negative implication within the patent statute . " Historically , utility was judicially interpreted to mean that the invention had to be capable of producing some ...
... utility " is the only requirement that is not defined , at least by negative implication within the patent statute . " Historically , utility was judicially interpreted to mean that the invention had to be capable of producing some ...
66. lappuse
... Utility , the General Trends As a general matter , the Patent and Trademark Office accepts allegations of utility made by the applicant to be factual and does not inquire further . Utility is determined 7 . 8 . 8 specific grounds of ...
... Utility , the General Trends As a general matter , the Patent and Trademark Office accepts allegations of utility made by the applicant to be factual and does not inquire further . Utility is determined 7 . 8 . 8 specific grounds of ...
68. lappuse
... utility allegation made , if the examiner points out the specific factual basis that causes the doubt as to the utility 14 stated.13 Proof is not required in every case , and is especially not necessary where utility can be inferred ...
... utility allegation made , if the examiner points out the specific factual basis that causes the doubt as to the utility 14 stated.13 Proof is not required in every case , and is especially not necessary where utility can be inferred ...
Saturs
A COMPARISON OF INTELLECTUAL PROPERTIES | 11 |
continued | 28 |
THE PATENTING PROCESS | 37 |
Autortiesības | |
7 citas sadaļas nav parādītas.
Bieži izmantoti vārdi un frāzes
acids action addition analysis anticipated Appeals atoms authority basis Brenner bromine carbon carboxylic chapter chemical cited claims Class composition compounds Congress considered Constitution container Corp decision described determined develop device differences disclosed disclosure discussed effect elements examiner example existence federal filed follows Graham grant held hinge hydrogen bromide idea infringement intellectual property interference invalid invention inventor involved issue known language later least limited manufacture material means metal method necessary noted novelty obtained obviousness overcap patent application patent law Patent Office percent person plate practice Preparation prior art protection provides reaction reference rejection result seal shank similar skill specific sprayer statute statutory structure subject matter suit supra Supreme Court tion TORTS trade secret Trademark United utility validity vinylic