Chemical Patentability and the ChemistUniversity of Wisconsin, 1978 - 312 lappuses |
No grāmatas satura
1.3. rezultāts no 14.
21. lappuse
Grady J. Frenchick. First , by definition , a trade secret is not a protectable trade secret unless it is in some sense ' secret ' . It is not generally required that a trade secret owner keep his trade secret absolutely secret , but ...
Grady J. Frenchick. First , by definition , a trade secret is not a protectable trade secret unless it is in some sense ' secret ' . It is not generally required that a trade secret owner keep his trade secret absolutely secret , but ...
22. lappuse
... Trade secrets are not protected under federal law , probably because there is no necessary limit to the length of time a trade secret may be maintained . This is contrary to the Constitutional mandate that Congress has the power to ...
... Trade secrets are not protected under federal law , probably because there is no necessary limit to the length of time a trade secret may be maintained . This is contrary to the Constitutional mandate that Congress has the power to ...
35. lappuse
... trade secret is a process or device for continuous use in the operation of the business .... Example of trade secrets include , a process for lengthening the shelf life of effervescent tablets , Forsest Laboratories Inc. v ...
... trade secret is a process or device for continuous use in the operation of the business .... Example of trade secrets include , a process for lengthening the shelf life of effervescent tablets , Forsest Laboratories Inc. v ...
Saturs
A COMPARISON OF INTELLECTUAL PROPERTIES | 11 |
continued | 28 |
THE PATENTING PROCESS | 37 |
Autortiesības | |
7 citas sadaļas nav parādītas.
Bieži izmantoti vārdi un frāzes
acids action addition analysis anticipated Appeals atoms authority basis Brenner bromine carbon carboxylic chapter chemical cited claims Class composition compounds Congress considered Constitution container Corp decision described determined develop device differences disclosed disclosure discussed effect elements examiner example existence federal filed follows Graham grant held hinge hydrogen bromide idea infringement intellectual property interference invalid invention inventor involved issue known language later least limited manufacture material means metal method necessary noted novelty obtained obviousness overcap patent application patent law Patent Office percent person plate practice Preparation prior art protection provides reaction reference rejection result seal shank similar skill specific sprayer statute statutory structure subject matter suit supra Supreme Court tion TORTS trade secret Trademark United utility validity vinylic