Chemical Patentability and the ChemistUniversity of Wisconsin, 1978 - 312 lappuses |
No grāmatas satura
1.3. rezultāts no 19.
40. lappuse
... follows the title . Not unlike abstracts of research papers , 37 C.F.R. § 1.72 ( b ) states the purpose of the abstract is to enable the public to determine the nature or gist of the technical disclosure . In the particular case of ...
... follows the title . Not unlike abstracts of research papers , 37 C.F.R. § 1.72 ( b ) states the purpose of the abstract is to enable the public to determine the nature or gist of the technical disclosure . In the particular case of ...
76. lappuse
... follows : The first inventor of a chemical compound ( assuming he can show a single utility sufficient to support patentability ) after obtaining a patent is entitled to control the manufacture , use and sale of the compound for a ...
... follows : The first inventor of a chemical compound ( assuming he can show a single utility sufficient to support patentability ) after obtaining a patent is entitled to control the manufacture , use and sale of the compound for a ...
108. lappuse
... in its dehydrated form , expressed in terms of approximate mol ratios of oxides as follows : 1.0 + 0.2 [ ( 1 - x ) [ CH3 ) 4N ] 2 0 : xM20 ] : A1203 : YS102 : ZP205 n 38 . 39 . The Patent Office had also allowed claims to a synthesis 108 .
... in its dehydrated form , expressed in terms of approximate mol ratios of oxides as follows : 1.0 + 0.2 [ ( 1 - x ) [ CH3 ) 4N ] 2 0 : xM20 ] : A1203 : YS102 : ZP205 n 38 . 39 . The Patent Office had also allowed claims to a synthesis 108 .
Saturs
A COMPARISON OF INTELLECTUAL PROPERTIES | 11 |
continued | 28 |
THE PATENTING PROCESS | 37 |
Autortiesības | |
7 citas sadaļas nav parādītas.
Bieži izmantoti vārdi un frāzes
acids action addition analysis anticipated Appeals atoms authority basis Brenner bromine carbon carboxylic chapter chemical cited claims Class composition compounds Congress considered Constitution container Corp decision described determined develop device differences disclosed disclosure discussed effect elements examiner example existence federal filed follows Graham grant held hinge hydrogen bromide idea infringement intellectual property interference invalid invention inventor involved issue known language later least limited manufacture material means metal method necessary noted novelty obtained obviousness overcap patent application patent law Patent Office percent person plate practice Preparation prior art protection provides reaction reference rejection result seal shank similar skill specific sprayer statute statutory structure subject matter suit supra Supreme Court tion TORTS trade secret Trademark United utility validity vinylic