To Amend Sec. 52 of Judicial Code and Other Statutes Affecting Procedure in Patent Office. Hearing....on H.R. 6256 and H.R. 7087 .... Feb. 4, 1926 |
No grāmatas satura
1.–5. rezultāts no 27.
5. lappuse
... BLOOM . Oh , you are trying to change certain laws - is that right ? Mr. HUXLEY . Yes , sir . Mr. BLOOм . Have you got that law with you ? I would like to read what you propose to change . The CHAIRMAN . Mr. Bloom , I think when Mr ...
... BLOOM . Oh , you are trying to change certain laws - is that right ? Mr. HUXLEY . Yes , sir . Mr. BLOOм . Have you got that law with you ? I would like to read what you propose to change . The CHAIRMAN . Mr. Bloom , I think when Mr ...
6. lappuse
... BLOOM . What are you reading from ? Mr. HUXLEY . The present law . The amendment simply pro- vides- Mr. BLOOM . Mr. Chairman , if you want me to sit in on these meetings , I wish you would instruct the gentleman to state what he is ...
... BLOOM . What are you reading from ? Mr. HUXLEY . The present law . The amendment simply pro- vides- Mr. BLOOM . Mr. Chairman , if you want me to sit in on these meetings , I wish you would instruct the gentleman to state what he is ...
7. lappuse
... BLOOM . What part of page 2 ? Mr. HUXLEY . Beginning with line 9 . Mr. HAMMER . In which bill ? Mr. HUXLEY . H. R. 7087 . Mr. BLOOM . Beginning with line 9 ? Mr. HUXLEY . Yes , and running through line 16. That cancels the indicated ...
... BLOOM . What part of page 2 ? Mr. HUXLEY . Beginning with line 9 . Mr. HAMMER . In which bill ? Mr. HUXLEY . H. R. 7087 . Mr. BLOOM . Beginning with line 9 ? Mr. HUXLEY . Yes , and running through line 16. That cancels the indicated ...
8. lappuse
... BLOOM . When you say " we , " whom do you mean by " we " ? Mr. HUXLEY . The American Bar Association . It does not abolish appeals in the Patent Office , but it would abolish the appeal from the Patent Office to the Court of Appeals of ...
... BLOOM . When you say " we , " whom do you mean by " we " ? Mr. HUXLEY . The American Bar Association . It does not abolish appeals in the Patent Office , but it would abolish the appeal from the Patent Office to the Court of Appeals of ...
9. lappuse
... BLOOM . You said the authority should be in one man . What do you mean by the authority should be in one man ? Mr. HUXLEY . Simply as a matter of organization . I am speaking now- Mr. BLOOM . Authority should be in one man - what do you ...
... BLOOM . You said the authority should be in one man . What do you mean by the authority should be in one man ? Mr. HUXLEY . Simply as a matter of organization . I am speaking now- Mr. BLOOM . Authority should be in one man - what do you ...
Bieži izmantoti vārdi un frāzes
action adverse parties residing allowed American Bar Association American Patent Law application assistant commissioners attorney at law BARLOW BARNETT bill in equity BLOOM board of examiners CHAIRMAN claim commis Commissioner of Patents Commissioner ROBERTSON committee Congress Court of Appeals court of equity decided district court District of Columbia equity court examiner of interferences examiners in chief fact favor FENNING final decision FRASER gentlemen give goes GOODWIN HAMMER hearing Howson HUXLEY indorsed interests interference proceedings interparty invention issued Judicial Code litigation matter MCLEOD mean novo objection patent attorneys Patent Commissioner Patent Law Association patent lawyer Patent Office patent section PAUL pending poor inventor present law present practice primary examiner procedure proposed R. S. section record remedy represent Revised Statutes simplify sioner six months statement Supreme Court taken thereof thing tion tribunal UNDERWOOD United WEDDERBURN WEFALD WILLIAMS
Populāri fragmenti
13. lappuse - ... of the Revised Statutes of the United States, be, and the same are hereby repealed, and sections nine, ten, eleven, twelve, fourteen, and sixteen of an act entitled "An act to amend the customs-revenue laws and to repeal moieties...
13. lappuse - In such suits the record in the Patent Office shall be admitted on motion of either party upon the terms and conditions as to costs, expenses, and the further cross-examination of the witnesses as the court imposes, without prejudice to the right of the parties to take further testimony.
13. lappuse - That section twenty-three hundred and twenty-five of the Revised Statutes of the United States be amended by adding thereto the following words: "Provided, that where the claimant for a patent is not a resident of or within the land district...
12. lappuse - Whenever an application is made for a patent which, in the opinion of the commissioner, would interfere with any pending application...
14. lappuse - ... in the case may appear. And such adjudication, if it be in favor of the right of the applicant, shall authorize the Commissioner to issue such patent on the applicant filing in the Patent Office a copy of the adjudication, and otherwise complying with the requirements of law. In all cases where there is no opposing party, a copy of the bill shall be served on the Commissioner ; and all the expenses of the proceeding shall be paid by the applicant, whether the final decision is in his favor or...
5. lappuse - ... appeal to the chief justice of the district court of the United States for the District of Columbia, by giving notice thereof to the Commissioner, and filing in the Patent Office, within such time as the Commissioner shall appoint, his reasons of appeal, specifically set forth in writing, and also paying into the Patent Office, to the credit of the patent fund, the sum of twenty-five dollars.
53. lappuse - If such party, except a party to an interference, is dissatisfied with the decision of the Commissioner, he may appeal to the Supreme Court of the District of Columbia, sitting in bane.
4. lappuse - All applications for patents shall be completed and prepared for examination within two years after the filing of the application, and in default thereof or upon failure of the applicant to prosecute...