« iepriekšējāTurpināt »
of those new medical school affiliations which are being compromised —will be compromised, without a doubt, by the recommendations now being made by OMB.
The health sciences center at Stony Brook is a new one and the largest and most complex being developed anywhere in the world. And, a significant part of our planning is the inclusion of the veterans hospital at Northport.
Just yesterday, in preparing for this appearance before you, I checked with the Director of the institution. And, was informed that the opening of the new 480 bed general, medical, and service hospital will be slowed down. This, of course, will mean that we cannot provide care for a significant number of veterans who we serve in the large Long Island area, not now served by a veterans hospital.
We estimate a population of some 5 million will fall within a purview of this new health sciences center. The delay in the opening of the hospital imperils the development of the academic program as well because the two are so highly integrated and hence, we must slow the opening of the nursing, the school of medicine, of dentistry, of allied health, of social welfare and even the school of basic sciences as a consequence of the proposed changes which we are already feeling at this new institution.
Now, for the parochial approach, that is a very acutely and keenly felt need on Long Island.
Second, I would like to comment on a couple of provisions of S. 59, which have not been touched upon in too much detail here today, particularly those that relate to the extension of care to the families of certain categories of veterans. I think this is an important matter for improving the care of this particular category of veterans.
All of us everywhere are attempting to treat the family as a total unit. I am sure that you are aware, Senator, of the great impetus in this country toward family care and the development of family care practitioners.
I would characterize the greatest medical need in the United States, today, in the country as a whole, as in the area of primary care. And then the medical schools must, at least divert, I would sider 30 to 40 percent of our graduates, to this area of primary care.
So the opportunity for providing such care for certain categories of dependents of veterans, those who have been totally disabled and those who have died as a consequence of service-connected disabilities, it seems to me that it would fulfill not only a moral responsibility for this group of veterans that made a very special sacrifice for all of us, but also as a very important fact of medical education, particularly in an area of neglected medical care, where we need to train personnel and have not done so would fulfill our responsibilities as medical educational institutions. I have highlighted that in greater detail in the prepared statement.
Third, I would like to comment on the provision also, for extending the care of veterans to the ambulatory area to relaxing some of the restrictions that now exist. This has been commented on by some of my colleagues and so I will go no further, except to say that, if the veterans hospitals are to advance further their enormous capabilities as educational institutions, but even more so to enhance the capabilities for the care of the veteran, the ambulatory care emphasis would get greater liberalities of the utmost importance.
We are all interested in preventing the use of hospitals as such a cost of instrumentalities. Now that ambulant care is the way we can do it, and we are doing this in the civilian sector. And I think that same benefit should be available to the veteran.
In my opinion, under certain circumstances, the hospitalization of a veteran or civilian impedes the diagnostic approach, slows down the therapeutic regimen, and indeed, very often impedes his getting back to the regular activities to which he wishes to return.
So, I do not go further into that except to say that this important area 'is essential if these institutions are to become comprehensive training positions for new kinds of health personnel which are very much needed in this country today.
Likewise, if we are ever to practice preventive medicine on any significant scale in this country for the veteran and the civilian, it will be within the ambulatory area of preventive medicine which, by definition, cannot be related to an anticipation of going to the hospital or a patient being discharged from the hospital. The very essence of it is the menace of health and the veteran, it seems to me, is entitled to those applications of knowledge we now have.
I would like to make a comment also about the importance, simply in passing, emphasizing the passage of S. 59 as an important integrated development with the passage of 92-541. I hope that in the few brief remarks that I have made you can see that the veterans hospital cannot really fulfill the expanded role in 92–541 without moving in this area. At least in part of family care and, also, in the area of ambulatory and preventive medicine.
I also would like to comment on the importance of the provisions of 92–541 for the extension of training into new areas of training of new health personnel and, most important of all, something I think the veterans hospitals are most uniquely designed to carry out, and that is experimentation in the redeployment of the functions now provided in the health care team among the manpower we now have.
We face in this country chaos in the total number of manpower and the kinds of manpower we have no way of conference between the kinds that we put out, and the actual needs of the patients we are serving
I think the Veterans' Administration hospitals under the provisions that I read in these two pieces of legislation would enable the country and, particularly, the veterans hospitals to be beneficiaries by the Department of Health and Manpower. Experimentation with new models and the development of new kinds of health care and, also, the possibility of the development of the matter which was so eloquently stated by some of the health educators today as an essential for the life-long development of careers for one of the health professions.
Lastly, I would like to comment on the importance of continuing education which you asked about repeatedly. It is my belief that one of the major problems we professionals face is the menace of competence in the face of the increasing capability of modern medicine.
Beyond that, however, I suspect that in most of the States of the Union, we will have some method of means of enforcing continued education of a practitioner as a means of preserving the safety and competence of that practitioner. And I expect, also, that it may be
well possible that licensure, periodically, may become necessary. This is necessary for continued education for every health professional in every region of this country, it will become mandatory for every institution, and the Veterans Administration, obviously, will be one of the primary agencies for health care delivery, and would have to take an essential role.
We at Northport are developing with the State University of New York at Stony Brook a new sort of arrangement in which the Northport Hospital becomes 1 of 5 or 6 which are a part of a tightly integrated consortium of institutions with a deployment of different functions for each institution.
The veterans hospital at Northport will have a very significant role in continuing education and I hope, therefore, for this reason that Public Law 92-541, S. 59 will be passed.
Mr. Chairman, forgive me for talking of the extension of services at a time whem OMB is speaking of restrictions, but I addressed myself to those key features which, I think, have not been covered in too much detail by the previous speakers.
Now, I would be delighted to answer any question, explicate or clarify any of my statement. .
Senator CRANSTON. I won't forgive you for it, but I thank you for it.
Do you feel that there is a particular need for VA to really provide leadership in this continuing education field?
Dr. PELLEGRINO. Yes, sir, I do. The leadership does not lie anywhere at the present time. I think the Veterans' Administration, because of its size, because of the fact that it has a mandate for education should move into this area and can move into this area very well.
Senator CRANSTON. In Public Law 92-541, we have a handy law and a way that we hope will have the VA providing that leadership.
We heard this morning from the Veterans' Administration that although research support is being reduced, the reduction will not have an impact on the research that could be achieved in VA hospitals. Are you aware of programs which have been eliminated or reduced as the result of these cuts?
Dr. PELLEGRINO. No; I am not, because at this point we have a new affiliation. One of the problems we suffer from is the reduction of support, is that we will not be able to establish a research program at all. We are starting from ground zero.
Senator CRANSTON. It eliminates one from starting?
Senator CRANSTON. Could you describe the impacts on patient care and hospital morale that the VA's arbitrary grade rollback requirements have mandated since this reduction ?
Dr. PELLEGRINO. I think my predecessor, Dr. Clayton Rich handled it very adequately, and I would only be repeating what he has said. The morale affect is very clear. .
Senator CRANSTON. Your discussion, and your prepared statement about the expansions of eligibility for certain dependents and of ambulatory care for the nonservice connected included in S. 59 is, I think, the best and most concise one that I have yet seen. Equally impressive is your very perceptive discussion of the new subchapter III, and the new chapter 82, added by Public Law 92-541.
I plan to send a copy of this statement to Chairman William Jennings Bryan Dorn of the House Veterans Committee for use by that Committee in considering S. 59. I think it will play a very helpful part in the House as well as in the Senate.
Do you have any suggestions as to where we might cut in the VA budget, the same question that I have asked others?
Dr. PELLEGRINO. No, sir, I do not. I think I am in the same position as my predecessors.
Senator CRANSTON. What about in the budget generally?
Dr. PELLEGRINO. I am not so bashful as my predecessors. I am a citizen that supports very strongly the statement that you made this morning on places where the budget could be cut. I sincerely hope that your efforts and those of others, like mind, will be successful.
Senator CRANSTON. Thank you very much.
In your prepared statement, you say your support for the specific provisions of S. 59 is based on your conviction that they wisl improve the care of veterans and especially those veterans in the category for which we have the greatest moral responsibility as a Nation. And you say that surely the veterans should not receive inferior care when a comprehensive pattern is available to the nonveteran in the community.
I want to say that I agree that we must set a high standard, that it is terribly important to keep that thought in the forefront
You also state in your prepared statement, the veterans hospitals also permit easier and better controlled opportunities for developing newer kinds of health manpower, for better models and patterns of delivery of care, and utilization of personnel.
What about training and employment by the VA of former military medics, is that another place where the VA can perform another great role in breaking ground for the development of careers for these veterans?
Dr. PELLEGRINO. Yes, indeed, I do. As a matter of fact, we and others in the physicians assistants programs are drawing on that reservoir and are using the veterans hospitals for that purpose.
Senator CRANSTON. In the prepared statement, you refer to the return in benefits to patient care and education for the money expended for certain types of education can be higher in a veterans hospital than in comparable institutions under private auspices.
Why? Could you support that in the record ?
Dr. PELLEGRINO. I would be glad to attempt to do so. Just give me the bottom line on that. These are the things that I think add up to the fact that the veterans hospitals are primarily patient care oriented institutions and that must be their primary goal.
When you try to do this in educational institutions you are buying a large reservoir of people, but also a lot of other things, which you don't necessarily have to do in a veterans hospital.
Senator CRANSTON. I thank you very much. Let me say that you have been as good as Willie Mays in his prime, as cleanup hitter, so to speak. Thank you.
[The prepared statement of Dr. Pellegrino follows:] STATEMENT OF DR. EDMUND D. PELLEGRINO, PRESIDENT ELECT
ASSOCIATION OF ACADEMIC HEALTH CENTERS, VICE PRESIDENT FOR HEALTH SCIENCE, DIRECTOR OF THE HEALTH SCIENCES CENTER, PROFESSOR OF MEDICINE, UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK AT STONY BROOK, NEW YORK
Mr. Chairman and members of the subcommittee: I am Dr. Edmund D. Pellegrino, Vice President for Health Sciences and Director of the Health Sciences Center of the State University of New York at Stony Brook, New York. I appear today as a physician, teacher, and academic health center administrator. I am also representing the Association of Academic Health Centers, of which I am President-elect. The latter is a national organization of the chief executive officers of the multi-school medical and health sciences centers in the United States, comprising some 80 institutions, nearly all of which are associated in patient care and teaching with the Veterans Administration Hospitals and health care system.
I have enjoyed some fifteen years of personal experience working with the Veterans Administration Hospital in Lexington, Kentucky, as Chairman of the Department of Medicine at the University of Kentucky and currently with the Veterans Hospital at Northport, New York. My comments will be based on these experiences with the Veterans Administration Hospitals as significant and indeed, indispensable elements in the production of health manpower for our nation.
I will limit my remarks to a few selected provisions of S 59 which I believe to be important for the improvement of the medical care provided for veterans and which simultaneously enhance the capacity of the veterans teaching hospitals to contribute even more significantly to the production of health manpower. I will refer to PL 92–541 only as it relates to these issues since its enactment and/or funding are so closely related to certain of the provisions of S 59.
Three issues will be addressed-expanding the use of Veterans Hospitals to include the families of certain categories of veterans, extensions of ambulatory and out-patient services to veterans and expansion of educational programs for health related personnel.
I believe also that these important objectives are achievable in a more economical and cost effective manner by optimizing the use of the Veterans Hospitals than by other methods available in the foreseeable future to expand education of health professions. The Veterans Hospitals can, in addition, assume a primary role in bringing a closer congruence between the number and kinds of health personnel we train and the manpower needs of veterans and society as a whole.
May I thank you for the privilege of submitting these remarks for your consideration. I am confident that the members of this sub-committee and the whole Congress will accurately assess the social significance of the provisions of PL 92–541 and S 59 in the light of their importance for the health of this country. All the members of the Association of Academic Health Centers are committed to a further enhancement of their cooperative efforts with the Veterans Administration for the immediate and long-range benefit of the people we serve. We await only the enactment and funding of these two pieces of legislation, to fulfill this obligation even more effectively than in the past.
(1) EXTENSION OF THE USE OF VETERANS HOSPITALS TO INCLUDE WIVES AND CHILDREN OF VETERANS WITH TOTAL DISABILITY FROM SERVICE-CONNECTED CAUSES AND THE WIDOWS AND CHILDREN OF VETERANS DYING FROM SERVICE-CONNECTED DISABILITIES
This provision is essential for the comprehensive care of the totally disabled veteran. We are all increasingly aware that treating a totally disabled person as an isolated unit without accompanying treatment of the members of his household is less than optimal and indeed self-defeating. The emotional and physical illnesses of other members of the family of a totally disabled individual have profound effects on the disabled person.
Only when the care of the total family unit is possible is maximal benefit achievable for the totally disabled veteran. This in turn shortens his hospital