The United States Patents Quarterly, 87. sējumsAssociated Industry Publications, 1951 |
No grāmatas satura
1.3. rezultāts no 80.
83. lappuse
... agreement . All that is here be- fore the Court is a single license agree- ment entered into by a patentee and his immediate exclusive licensee , with an- other who , in turn , is authorized to also make use of the combination of the ...
... agreement . All that is here be- fore the Court is a single license agree- ment entered into by a patentee and his immediate exclusive licensee , with an- other who , in turn , is authorized to also make use of the combination of the ...
285. lappuse
... agree- ment fixes a royalty not to exceed the royalty of the same article or process fixed in the license agreements set out in Article II hereof . 2. Defendant United States Gypsum Company is hereby enjoined and re- strained from ...
... agree- ment fixes a royalty not to exceed the royalty of the same article or process fixed in the license agreements set out in Article II hereof . 2. Defendant United States Gypsum Company is hereby enjoined and re- strained from ...
320. lappuse
... agree- ment may not challenge the validity of the licensed patent in a suit for royalties due under the contract ; United States v . Harvey Steel Co. , 196 U.S. 310. " It is true that there is no recital , in the Supreme Court decision ...
... agree- ment may not challenge the validity of the licensed patent in a suit for royalties due under the contract ; United States v . Harvey Steel Co. , 196 U.S. 310. " It is true that there is no recital , in the Supreme Court decision ...
Saturs
American Automobile Insurance | 9 |
161 | 27 |
Triangle Publications Inc Amster | 30 |
Autortiesības | |
32 citas sadaļas nav parādītas.
Citi izdevumi - Skatīt visu
Bieži izmantoti vārdi un frāzes
87 USPQ action agree agreement alleged amount appeal application cause Circuit cited claims combination Company complaint conclusion confusion considered contained contention contract copy Corp Corporation damages Decided decision defendant defendant's denied determination device disclosed dismissed District Court effect elements evidence Examiner fact filed follows further granted ground held holding infringement interference invalid invention involved issue Judge judgment jurisdiction letters license limited machine manufacture material matter means ment metal method motion notice operation opinion original parties Patent Office plaintiff position practice present prior prior art purchase question raking reason record referred registration respect result royalties rule sell side similar sold specific substantially suit thereof tion trade mark trial unfair competition United validity wheels York