The United States Patents Quarterly, 87. sējumsAssociated Industry Publications, 1951 |
No grāmatas satura
1.3. rezultāts no 82.
196. lappuse
... application and specifications were rejected by the Patent Office as having no basis in the applica- tion as originally filed and being a de- parture therefrom . The proposed amend- ments were cancelled and withdrawn by Allen . The file ...
... application and specifications were rejected by the Patent Office as having no basis in the applica- tion as originally filed and being a de- parture therefrom . The proposed amend- ments were cancelled and withdrawn by Allen . The file ...
397. lappuse
... Patent Office . The interference proceeding was in- itiated by the United States Patent Office to determine whether William S. Watts , one of the Respondents , or Julian Rogoff , Petitioner herein , is the first inventor of an invention ...
... Patent Office . The interference proceeding was in- itiated by the United States Patent Office to determine whether William S. Watts , one of the Respondents , or Julian Rogoff , Petitioner herein , is the first inventor of an invention ...
398. lappuse
... Patent Office will not receive testimony for the purpose of explaining the disclosure of a pending application except in very exceptional cases . Application of Oppenauer , 143 F.2d 974 [ 62 USPQ 297 ] ( Court of Customs and Patent ...
... Patent Office will not receive testimony for the purpose of explaining the disclosure of a pending application except in very exceptional cases . Application of Oppenauer , 143 F.2d 974 [ 62 USPQ 297 ] ( Court of Customs and Patent ...
Saturs
American Automobile Insurance | 9 |
161 | 27 |
Triangle Publications Inc Amster | 30 |
Autortiesības | |
32 citas sadaļas nav parādītas.
Citi izdevumi - Skatīt visu
Bieži izmantoti vārdi un frāzes
87 USPQ action agree agreement alleged amount appeal application cause Circuit cited claims combination Company complaint conclusion confusion considered contained contention contract copy Corp Corporation damages Decided decision defendant defendant's denied determination device disclosed dismissed District Court effect elements evidence Examiner fact filed follows further granted ground held holding infringement interference invalid invention involved issue Judge judgment jurisdiction letters license limited machine manufacture material matter means ment metal method motion notice operation opinion original parties Patent Office plaintiff position practice present prior prior art purchase question raking reason record referred registration respect result royalties rule sell side similar sold specific substantially suit thereof tion trade mark trial unfair competition United validity wheels York