 Their sole distinguishing feature is that they should be the necessary incidents of the litigated act; necessary, in this sense, that they are part of the immediate preparations for, or emanations of such act, and are not produced by the calculated policy...  Atlantic Reporter - 269. lappuse1894Pilnskats - Par šo grāmatu
 | Illinois. Supreme Court - 1913 - 712 lapas
...whether participant or bystander. They may comprise things left undone as well as things done. Their sole distinguishing feature is that they should be the...not produced by the calculated policy of the actors. In other words, they must stand in immediate causal relation to the act, — a relation not broken... | |
 | 1910 - 2132 lapas
...participant or bystander ; they may comprise things left undone :<•> well as things done. Their sole distinguishing feature is that they should be the...emanations of such act and are not produced by the calculating policy of the actors. In other words. they must stand on immediate causal relation to the... | |
 | 1881 - 1116 lapas
...whether participant or bystander; they may comprise things left undone as well as things done. Their sole distinguishing feature is that they should be the...not produced by the calculated policy of the actors. Upon the same principle rest the declarations of agents or officers of corporations made at the time... | |
 | California - 1881 - 806 lapas
...they are admissible as original evidence. " The distinguishing feature of declarations of this class is, that they should be the necessary incidents of...in this sense, that they are part of the immediate concomitants or conditions of such act, and are not produced by the calculated policy of the actors.... | |
 | Isaac Grant Thompson - 1882 - 962 lapas
...participant or bystander; they may com|irise things left undone as well as things done. Their sole distinguishing feature is that they should be the...produced by the calculated policy of the actors.' This definition obviously embraces Cox v. State. the declarations now challenged, for they were immediate... | |
 | Indiana. Supreme Court, Horace E. Carter, Albert Gallatin Porter, Gordon Tanner, Benjamin Harrison, Michael Crawford Kerr, James Buckley Black, Augustus Newton Martin, Francis Marion Dice, John Worth Kern, John Lewis Griffiths, Sidney Romelee Moon, Charles Frederick Remy - 1882 - 686 lapas
...participants or bystanders ; they may comprise things left undone as well as things done. Their sole distinguishing feature is that they should be the necessary incidents of the litigated act." 1 Wharton Evidence, sec. 259. Whetherthe declarations are those of a bystander or those of a participant,... | |
 | 1914 - 1230 lapas
...be applied. The distinguishing feature of statements or declarations admissible under this rule In that they should be the necessary incidents of the...In this sense, that they are part of the immediate preparation for or emanations of such act. Such incidents, whether acts or declarations, become In... | |
 | Illinois. Appellate Court, James Bolesworth Bradwell - 1884 - 728 lapas
...whether participant or bystander. They may comprise things left nndone as well as things done. Their sole distinguishing feature is that they should be the...necessary incidents of the litigated act — necessary in the sense that they are a part of the preparations for, or emanations of such act, and are not produced... | |
 | 1889 - 960 lapas
...//estocan be arbitrarily confined." Whart. Grim. Ev. §2o'2. And again, it is said that "they must be necessary incidents of the litigated act; necessary in this sense, that they are paît of the immediate concomitants or conditions of such act, and are not produced by the calculated... | |
 | 1894 - 1150 lapas
...incidents may be separated from the act by a lapse of time more or less appreciable. « » * Their sole distinguishing feature is that they should be the...declarations the rule is well stated in 21 Am. & Eng. Ene. I.aw, 102, that If they "are made under such circumstances as will raise the reasonable presumption... | |
| |
