Decisions of the Commissioner of Patents and of the United States Courts in Patent and Trade-mark and Copyright CasesU.S. Government Printing Office, 1919 Compiled from Official gazette. Beginning with 1876, the volumes have included also decisions of United States courts, decisions of Secretary of Interior, opinions of Attorney-General, and important decisions of state courts in relation to patents, trade-marks, etc. 1869-94, not in Congressional set. |
No grāmatas satura
1.5. rezultāts no 81.
3. lappuse
... taken from the decision of the Examiners - in - Chief granting a motion made by Jepson to dissolve the interference . The single count is as follows : In an arrangement of the class described , a carbon pile , a lever operating upon one ...
... taken from the decision of the Examiners - in - Chief granting a motion made by Jepson to dissolve the interference . The single count is as follows : In an arrangement of the class described , a carbon pile , a lever operating upon one ...
9. lappuse
... taken as the period limiting an applicant's right to copy claims from a patent , he must be granted the right to explain the delay beyond that period . 2. SAME - SAME - SAME - SAME - PRACTICE . Where an applicant who copies claims from ...
... taken as the period limiting an applicant's right to copy claims from a patent , he must be granted the right to explain the delay beyond that period . 2. SAME - SAME - SAME - SAME - PRACTICE . Where an applicant who copies claims from ...
10. lappuse
... taken it seems clear , therefore , that the right to ex- plain the delay must be granted to the applicant . In the second place , an inventor after another has patented the in- vention may wait up to two years before filing his own ...
... taken it seems clear , therefore , that the right to ex- plain the delay must be granted to the applicant . In the second place , an inventor after another has patented the in- vention may wait up to two years before filing his own ...
11. lappuse
... taken from a patent where the period of delay exceeds two years and declare an interference only where a prima facie case overcoming the charge of dilatoriness is made out by the applicant . Such a showing would of course be open to ...
... taken from a patent where the period of delay exceeds two years and declare an interference only where a prima facie case overcoming the charge of dilatoriness is made out by the applicant . Such a showing would of course be open to ...
27. lappuse
... taken in it is fundamentally similar . The decision in Sundh Electric Co. v . Interborough Rapid Transit Co. , which overruled the decision of the circuit court by Judge Hazel ( published in 222 Fed . Rep . , 334 ) upon the ground of ...
... taken in it is fundamentally similar . The decision in Sundh Electric Co. v . Interborough Rapid Transit Co. , which overruled the decision of the circuit court by Judge Hazel ( published in 222 Fed . Rep . , 334 ) upon the ground of ...
Citi izdevumi - Skatīt visu
Bieži izmantoti vārdi un frāzes
abandoned affirmed alleged amend anticipation apparatus appellant's appellee application Assistant Commissioner cancelation carbon pile Circuit Court combination Commissioner of Patents Company construction cottonseed oil counts Court of Appeals Decided decision decree defendant descriptive device disclosed disclosure District Court District of Columbia Electric elements entitled evidence Examiner of Interferences Examiners-in-Chief extending fact filed glycerids granted held infringement interference proceeding invention in controversy inventor involved issue jurisdiction lever machine manufacture mark matter McAfee means mechanism ment metal motion operation opinion opposition proceedings original party patent in suit patent law Patent Office perforated petition petitioner plaintiff plate Primary Examiner prior art prior invention priority of invention question reduction to practice reference refused registration reissue res adjudicata rheostat rule specification statute subject-matter substantially supra testimony tion Topliff trade trade-mark tribunals tube United word writ of mandamus
Populāri fragmenti
242. lappuse - ... not patented or described in any printed publication in this or any foreign country, before his invention or discovery thereof, or more than two years prior to his application, and not in public use or on sale in this country for more than two years prior to his application, unless the same is proved to have been abandoned, may, upon payment of the fees required by law, and other due proceeding had, obtain a patent therefor.
242. lappuse - Any person who has invented or discovered any new and useful art, machine, manufacture or composition of matter, or any new and useful improvement thereof, not known or used by others in this country before his invention or discovery thereof...
30. lappuse - That he was not the original and first inventor or discoverer of any material and substantial part of the thing patented; or, Fifth.
180. lappuse - That no mark which consists merely in the name of an individual, firm, corporation, or association, not written, printed, impressed, or woven in some particular or distinctive manner or in association with a portrait of the individual, or merely in words or devices which are descriptive of the goods with which they are used, or of the character or quality of such goods, or merely a geographical name or term, shall be registered under the terms of this act...
242. lappuse - Fifth. That it had been in public use or on sale in this country for more than two years before his application for a patent, or had been abandoned to the public.
101. lappuse - Whenever an application is made for a patent which, in the opinion of the Commissioner, would interfere with any pending application, or with any unexpired patent, he shall give notice thereof to the applicants, or applicant and patentee, as the case may be. The question of priority of invention...
182. lappuse - He has no right to appropriate a sign or a symbol, which, from the nature of the fact it is used to signify, others may employ with equal truth, and therefore have an equal right to employ for the same purpose...
183. lappuse - That no mark by which the goods of the owner of the mark may be distinguished from other goods of the same class...
87. lappuse - The applicant shall make oath that he does verily believe himself to be the original and first inventor or discoverer of the art, machine, manufacture, composition, or improvement, or of the variety of plant, for which he solicits a patent; that he does not know and does not believe that the same was ever before known or used; and shall state of what country he is a citizen.
339. lappuse - ... based on the use or manufacture by or for the United States of any article heretofore owned, leased, used by, or in the possession of the United States...