Better Management Information Can be Obtained from the Quality Control System Used in the Aid to Families with Dependent Children Program: Report to the Chairman, Committee on Finance, United States SenateU.S. General Accounting Office, 1980 - 56 lappuses |
No grāmatas satura
1.–5. rezultāts no 21.
2. lappuse
... sample of its AFDC cases every 6 months . The samples vary in size from about 150 cases in the States with fewer than 10,000 AFDC cases to about 1,200 cases in States with more than 60,000 AFDC cases . About 45,000 cases are reviewed ...
... sample of its AFDC cases every 6 months . The samples vary in size from about 150 cases in the States with fewer than 10,000 AFDC cases to about 1,200 cases in States with more than 60,000 AFDC cases . About 45,000 cases are reviewed ...
3. lappuse
... sample cases are reviewed by State QC re- viewers to determine the accuracy of the grant amount and to verify the recipient's eligibility in a given month . For each case , the reviewer verifies factors , such as family income ...
... sample cases are reviewed by State QC re- viewers to determine the accuracy of the grant amount and to verify the recipient's eligibility in a given month . For each case , the reviewer verifies factors , such as family income ...
4. lappuse
... sample periods . In response to opposition toward the sanctions proposed in 1978 , HHS issued a final regulation in March 1979 that contained less severe sanctioning criteria . The regulation reduced the error improvement rate to 6.4 ...
... sample periods . In response to opposition toward the sanctions proposed in 1978 , HHS issued a final regulation in March 1979 that contained less severe sanctioning criteria . The regulation reduced the error improvement rate to 6.4 ...
5. lappuse
... sample cases from the January - June 1978 sample period in five of the States to determine the type and amount of management information that was not being gathered by the QC system . We reviewed the QC sampling plans for selecting AFDC ...
... sample cases from the January - June 1978 sample period in five of the States to determine the type and amount of management information that was not being gathered by the QC system . We reviewed the QC sampling plans for selecting AFDC ...
9. lappuse
... samples of cases are reviewed . Second , the QC error rates can be affected by State program and policy differences . Finally , differences in the way QC re- views are made ( discussed in ch . 3 ) can affect QC error rates regardless of ...
... samples of cases are reviewed . Second , the QC error rates can be affected by State program and policy differences . Finally , differences in the way QC re- views are made ( discussed in ch . 3 ) can affect QC error rates regardless of ...
Bieži izmantoti vārdi un frāzes
administrative period AFDC payment AFDC program AFDC quality AGENCY COMMENTS Ahart Aid to Families analysis of QC APPENDIX April 18 assessment assistance basis for sanctions Better Management Information California causes of errors current QC data analysis DEPENDENT CHILDREN PROGRAM developing corrective actions Director draft report earned income effective erroneous payments error causes evaluation factors Families with Dependent Federal Government Federal level Federal QC Getting Better Management Hawaii HHS officials home visits improve incentive incorrect pay incorrect payments Indiana Information from Quality January-June 1978 less than $5 Maryland ments monitoring need standard payment error rate payments of less percent QC data QC error rates QC manual QC procedures QC review procedures QC sample QC system Quality Control review quality control system re-reviews recipient's recommendation reduce errors regional QC regulations require result sample period secondary errors Secretary of HHS Social Security Social Security Administration State's tion verification welfare
Populāri fragmenti
56. lappuse - New York State Department of Social Services 40 North Pearl Street Albany, New York 12243 Treasurer: Handy D.
8. lappuse - Hearings before the Subcommittee on Oversight of the House Committee on Ways and Means, 96th Cong, 1st Sess, 5 (1979) (statement of Jerome Kurtz, Commissioner of Internal Revenue) (emphasis added).
7. lappuse - Agriculture before the Subcommittee on Domestic Marketing, Consumer Relations and Nutrition House Committee on Agriculture October 3, 1991 Mr.
17. lappuse - To be eligible for AFDC, a child must be deprived of parental support or care because of the continued absence of a parent...
8. lappuse - Assistance Program. Proposed regulations will strike a serious blow to Federal-State relations. The partnership between these levels of government will be seriously weakened if the Federal Government chooses to penalize all of the States for administering programs which none are able to administer in a manner to avoid such penalties. — Chairman, North Dakota Legislative Council.
8. lappuse - It would appear obvious that justice requires that no agency of government should withhold matching funds for malfunctions to which it has contributed. — ■ Commissioner.
iv. lappuse - EVALUATION Regarding GAO's recommendation to retract the sanctions directive, HHS did not favor full retraction, while five of the six States GAO visited were in favor of such action. GAO still believes sanctions are not appropriate. Regarding GAO's recommendations to the Secretary of HHS for more...
13. lappuse - The conference committee directed the Secretary of HHS to issue new regulations requiring all States to reduce their AFDC payment error rate...
14. lappuse - Failure to meet the error rate target each year is to result in the loss of Federal matching funds associated with erroneous payment expenditures in excess of the target.