Better Management Information Can be Obtained from the Quality Control System Used in the Aid to Families with Dependent Children Program: Report to the Chairman, Committee on Finance, United States SenateU.S. General Accounting Office, 1980 - 56 lappuses |
No grāmatas satura
1.–5. rezultāts no 16.
ii. lappuse
... differences between quality con- trol reviews , but has not determined how this affects the identification of incor- rect payments . ( See ch . 3. ) HHS regional offices do not follow consistent proce- dures in assessing State quality ...
... differences between quality con- trol reviews , but has not determined how this affects the identification of incor- rect payments . ( See ch . 3. ) HHS regional offices do not follow consistent proce- dures in assessing State quality ...
6. lappuse
... differences among the States , and ( 3 ) are not based on the same error identification procedures in all States . ( See ch . 3. ) PAST EFFECT OF SANCTIONS HHS officials responsible for QC in the AFDC program believe that fiscal ...
... differences among the States , and ( 3 ) are not based on the same error identification procedures in all States . ( See ch . 3. ) PAST EFFECT OF SANCTIONS HHS officials responsible for QC in the AFDC program believe that fiscal ...
9. lappuse
... differences and AFDC program differences . --The Federal - State working relationship is negatively affected . Some officials told us that sanctions can negatively affect the potential of QC for identifying errors . For example , one ...
... differences and AFDC program differences . --The Federal - State working relationship is negatively affected . Some officials told us that sanctions can negatively affect the potential of QC for identifying errors . For example , one ...
10. lappuse
... differences . Therefore , QC error rates are not completely satisfactory for comparing the quality of States ' program administration that is needed for equitably applying sanctions . The following are examples of program differences ...
... differences . Therefore , QC error rates are not completely satisfactory for comparing the quality of States ' program administration that is needed for equitably applying sanctions . The following are examples of program differences ...
13. lappuse
... differences in the review pro- cedures are reflected in State error rates . Without knowing these effects , the proportion of a State's error rate that is due to administrative problems and the proportion due to QC review differences ...
... differences in the review pro- cedures are reflected in State error rates . Without knowing these effects , the proportion of a State's error rate that is due to administrative problems and the proportion due to QC review differences ...
Bieži izmantoti vārdi un frāzes
administrative period AFDC payment AFDC program AFDC quality AGENCY COMMENTS Ahart Aid to Families analysis of QC APPENDIX April 18 assessment assistance basis for sanctions Better Management Information California causes of errors current QC data analysis DEPENDENT CHILDREN PROGRAM developing corrective actions Director draft report earned income effective erroneous payments error causes evaluation factors Families with Dependent Federal Government Federal level Federal QC Getting Better Management Hawaii HHS officials home visits improve incentive incorrect pay incorrect payments Indiana Information from Quality January-June 1978 less than $5 Maryland ments monitoring need standard payment error rate payments of less percent QC data QC error rates QC manual QC procedures QC review procedures QC sample QC system Quality Control review quality control system re-reviews recipient's recommendation reduce errors regional QC regulations require result sample period secondary errors Secretary of HHS Social Security Social Security Administration State's tion verification welfare
Populāri fragmenti
56. lappuse - New York State Department of Social Services 40 North Pearl Street Albany, New York 12243 Treasurer: Handy D.
8. lappuse - Hearings before the Subcommittee on Oversight of the House Committee on Ways and Means, 96th Cong, 1st Sess, 5 (1979) (statement of Jerome Kurtz, Commissioner of Internal Revenue) (emphasis added).
7. lappuse - Agriculture before the Subcommittee on Domestic Marketing, Consumer Relations and Nutrition House Committee on Agriculture October 3, 1991 Mr.
17. lappuse - To be eligible for AFDC, a child must be deprived of parental support or care because of the continued absence of a parent...
8. lappuse - Assistance Program. Proposed regulations will strike a serious blow to Federal-State relations. The partnership between these levels of government will be seriously weakened if the Federal Government chooses to penalize all of the States for administering programs which none are able to administer in a manner to avoid such penalties. — Chairman, North Dakota Legislative Council.
8. lappuse - It would appear obvious that justice requires that no agency of government should withhold matching funds for malfunctions to which it has contributed. — ■ Commissioner.
iv. lappuse - EVALUATION Regarding GAO's recommendation to retract the sanctions directive, HHS did not favor full retraction, while five of the six States GAO visited were in favor of such action. GAO still believes sanctions are not appropriate. Regarding GAO's recommendations to the Secretary of HHS for more...
13. lappuse - The conference committee directed the Secretary of HHS to issue new regulations requiring all States to reduce their AFDC payment error rate...
14. lappuse - Failure to meet the error rate target each year is to result in the loss of Federal matching funds associated with erroneous payment expenditures in excess of the target.