Lapas attēli
PDF
ePub

abounded and still does

[ocr errors]

with the added benefit of education and basic research by the university community. Just think of how many graduate students presented their results here at Boulder. (Including one of the current conference co-chairs!).

Looking through the index from the first meeting in 1969, I noticed that at least one person who gave a paper at the first meeting is at this meeting, and that is Dave Edwards (Fig. 6). He is going to give a paper later this week. Our first foreign participant is Jon Davit, an individual from CGE in France. CGE was a prime developer of high-power glass laser systems at that time. We move on five years later and there is selffocusing. Jack Marburger, a major contributor in that area, will be our banquet speaker on Thursday night (Figs. 7 and 8). This summary starts to give you an indication of some of the people involved and some of those people who are still coming to this meeting.

Let us move on to our glorious Tenth. In the tenth symposium, measurement of absorption characteristics and bulk material properties were big players. On the second page of contents it is interesting to note: Dave Milam, Brian Newnam, Art Guenther, Hal Bennett, and if you look down at the bottom, there is M.J. Soileau, all present cochairmen and all are found on one page of the index of that particular year (Figs. 9 and 10). And if we go on to our fifteenth, John Detrio, gave a presentation on ASTM, and John is here at this particular meeting (Figs. 11, 12,13, and 14, Laser Induced Damage in Optical Materials: 1983, NBS Special Publication No.688). If we go on, we see what happened just five years ago. You are going to hear more in depth discussion of the surface and mirrors and fundamental mechanism areas during the review papers at this conference.

It is interesting to note that at that particular meeting there was a report of roundrobin experiments involving damage testing of thin films, fifteen years after the meeting started and we were now at least at a round-robin test. And by the way, it was interesting that a lot of these people went to Liechtenstein to discuss this subject, and we published reports on our deliberations in a special issue of Applied Optics. There were several papers at that meeting that dealt with the measurements of damage at seven to nine different laboratories throughout the world to try to see how well we understood the damage process and if we could agree on levels.

At our tenth, we had a logo contest and that was the logo that was drawn up by Jerry Bettis then at the Air Force Weapons Lab, now at Rocketdyne. He is here in the audience. We were a lot more staid bunch of people at that time, as you can tell from the next figure (Fig. 15). Anyhow, we did put a sheet which described its significance, in the proceedings of our tenth meeting (Fig. 16). You will remember from the first slide I showed, that these are the flatiron mountains, and we are doing a little damage down here at the foothills of the flatirons, and that is the logo of the Boulder Damage Symposium.

We sent out announcements to people and suggested to them how they should prepare their abstracts to be published in the program. One of the examples I would like to share with you says that a solution to laser induced surface damage was found. I will not tell you who the authors are yet, but the abstract says

ever since roughness assisted laser breakdown reared its jagged head, the
attempts to explain the effects have gone through ups and downs. In the
particularly heated attack on the problem, samples were flame polished and
then tested. Although there was some improvement in threshold, people
tended to gloss over our results. We attempted to dig out the answer by
etching some test samples, but we only managed to magnify the depth of the
difficulty. We also tried to cover the problem up by using thin film
overcoats, but even the laser beam saw through that ruse.

So we have tried a new approach, which we reported in another paper. We
made numerous measurements and gathered mountains of data on height
distributions in the expectation that essential features would stand out.
Analyses of the data included determining slope distributions, since we were
obviously searching for new slants on the problem. This method, in which
detail analysis of large quantities of data would cause proper relationships
to surface and suggest themselves, is called the auto-correlation approach.
So if I were to say we were successful, the answer would be simplicity
itself. The problem is that standard components have surfaces. Surface
damage is not possible if there is no surface to damage. This realization
immediately suggested the proper solution, as is well known, a piece of
material in the shape of Mobius strip has two faces, but only one surface.
Edges do not count here, therefore make an optical component in the shape
of a Mobius strip and radiate the face that has no surface. Our
paper
discusses how to accomplish this new twist in optics and technology.

That was written by A. Anonymous and U.N. Known of Bedlam Agriculture and Technical School that is in Bedlam, New York 10023. It really was the work of Dick House at the Weapons Laboratory who was a student at that particular time. I guess he had nothing better to do than to write comic literature for us to enjoy. But anyhow one of the things that we did at the tenth was to do an index of all the papers and divide them up by abstract, subjects titles, authors, and by year (Fig. 17). It is our intention, if possible, to try and put out a twenty- year index at the end of this particular meeting. Let us go on, we were so successful with our logo we even ended up on the cover of Applied Optics (Fig. 18). These ties are golden now and becoming collectors items. Through the use of this logo, we try to promulgate the meetings' identity, location and importance.

With that foundation

[ocr errors]

watch our next 20 years! Thank you, all of you, ( without you there would be no meeting) you have truly advanced our understanding and aroused our awareness of the importance of laser-induced damage studies. Come back for our twentieth anniversary meeting next year.

[graphic]

Figure 1.

Flatiron mountains overlooking the Boulder Laboratories (right center) served as the logo for the 1969 Damage

Symposium.

[blocks in formation]

1969 A. J. Glass, A. H. Guenther (C.M. Stickley) 1979 add H. E. Bennett and B. E. Newnam

1981 add D. Milam, good-bye A. J. Glass 1987 add M. J. Soileau

1988 add L. Chase, good-bye D. Milam

[blocks in formation]

Sponsors

AFOSR, ASTM, DARPA, DOE (LANL, LLNL), NIST (NBS) ONR

Figure 2. Boulder Damage Symposium movers.

[blocks in formation]

Boulder Damage Symposium Participation Indicates Strong Interest in Laser Damage Research

60

d

50

40

30

[blocks in formation]

70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88

Symposium Year

Figure 3.

Boulder Damage Symposia participation/presentations-1969 through 1988.

[blocks in formation]
« iepriekšējāTurpināt »