Commentaries on American Law, 1. sējumsO. Halsted, 1832 |
No grāmatas satura
1.5. rezultāts no 47.
19. lappuse
... British authori- ty was silent . The most celebrated collections and codes of maritime law , such as the Consolato del Mare , the laws of Oleron , the laws of the Hanseatic league , and , above all , the marine ordinances of Lewis XIV ...
... British authori- ty was silent . The most celebrated collections and codes of maritime law , such as the Consolato del Mare , the laws of Oleron , the laws of the Hanseatic league , and , above all , the marine ordinances of Lewis XIV ...
23. lappuse
... British government officially de- clared to the allied powers in 1821 , that no government was more prepared than their own , " to uphold the right of any state or states to interfere where their own security or essential interests were ...
... British government officially de- clared to the allied powers in 1821 , that no government was more prepared than their own , " to uphold the right of any state or states to interfere where their own security or essential interests were ...
28. lappuse
... British title to the four seas , surrounding the British islands , and known by the name of the British seas , and , consequently , to the exclusive right of fishing , and of con- trolling the navigation of foreigners therein . On the ...
... British title to the four seas , surrounding the British islands , and known by the name of the British seas , and , consequently , to the exclusive right of fishing , and of con- trolling the navigation of foreigners therein . On the ...
31. lappuse
... British claim to supremacy over the narrow seas adjacent to the British isles , because we shall stand in need of simi- lar accommodation and means of security . It was declared , in the case of Le Louis , that maritime states claim ...
... British claim to supremacy over the narrow seas adjacent to the British isles , because we shall stand in need of simi- lar accommodation and means of security . It was declared , in the case of Le Louis , that maritime states claim ...
33. lappuse
... British government did not conceive that they had the right , or the pretension , to make any complaint of it , and that they had made none . No nation has a right , in time of peace , to interfere with , or interrupt , any commerce ...
... British government did not conceive that they had the right , or the pretension , to make any complaint of it , and that they had made none . No nation has a right , in time of peace , to interfere with , or interrupt , any commerce ...
Citi izdevumi - Skatīt visu
Bieži izmantoti vārdi un frāzes
act of Congress admiralty admiralty and maritime admiralty jurisdiction admitted ancient appeal articles of confederation authority belligerent blockade British Bynk capture character Circuit Court citizens civil claim cognizance colonies commerce common law concurrent condemned confiscation considered constitution consuls contraband contract convention Court of Admiralty Cranch crimes criminal decisions declared District Courts doctrine duties enemy England English exclusive execution exercise extend favour federal courts foreign France grant Grotius high seas hostile judges judicial power judiciary act jurisdic jurisprudence justice law of nations laws of war legislative legislature Lord Lord Coke Lord Mansfield maritime jurisdiction ment militia navigation neutral neutral country New-York offence opinion party peace person piracy port President principles prize court prohibited punishment question rule senate ship sovereign statute suit Supreme Court territory tion traband trade treaty Union United usage Vattel vessel vested violation Wheaton
Populāri fragmenti
451. lappuse - So, if a law be in opposition to the Constitution, if both the law and the Constitution apply to a particular case, so that the court must either decide that case conformably to the law, disregarding the Constitution, or conformably to the Constitution, disregarding the law, the court must determine which of these conflicting rules governs the case. This is of the very essence of judicial duty.
235. lappuse - Each House may determine the Rules of its Proceedings, punish its Members for disorderly Behaviour, and, with the Concurrence of two thirds, expel a Member. Each House shall keep a Journal of its Proceedings, and from time to time publish the same, excepting such Parts as may in their Judgment require...
370. lappuse - ... saving to suitors, in all cases, the right of a common law remedy, where the common law is competent to give it...
358. lappuse - And shall have exclusive cognizance of all crimes and offences cognizable under the authority of the United States...
387. lappuse - Whenever the terms in which a power is granted to congress, or the nature of the power, require that it should be exercised exclusively by congress, the subject is as completely taken from the state legislatures as if they had been expressly forbidden to act on it.
451. lappuse - Certainly all those who have framed written constitutions contemplate them as forming the fundamental and paramount law of the nation, and consequently the theory of every such government must be, that an act of the Legislature, repugnant to the Constitution, is void.
299. lappuse - That a final judgment or decree in any suit, in the highest court of law or equity of a State in which a decision in the suit could be had, where is drawn in question the validity of a treaty or statute of or an authority exercised under the United States, and the decision is against their validity...
139. lappuse - I take the modern established rule to be this, that generally they are not contraband, but may become so under circumstances arising out of the particular situation of the war, or the condition of the parties engaged in it.
469. lappuse - The Common Law includes those principles, usages, and rules of action applicable to the government and security of person and property which do not rest for their authority upon any express and positive declaration of the will of the legislature.
407. lappuse - An ex post facto law is one which renders an act punishable in a manner in which it was not punishable when it was committed.