It is now insisted that the evidence thus adduced not only warranted, but should have compelled, the granting of the motion. In this behalf the argument of counsel for the defendant and appellant is identical with the argument made against the sufficiency of the evidence to warrant and support the judgment in the case above referred to. Our conclusion in that case was that the evidence amply supports the judgment, and that being so, the court below was justified upon the same evidence in denying the motion to compel the plaintiff to satisfy the judgment. The order appealed from is affirmed. ABANDONMENT. See Contract, 17; Dedication, 5. ACCIDENT. See Workmen's Compensation Act, 19, 20. ACCOMPLICES. See Criminal Law, 47. ACCOUNT. 1. IMPROPER ITEM-BILL OF PARTICULARS-ADMISSION IN EVIDENCE 2. ADJUSTMENT OF ITEMS ARISING OUT OF EXCHANGE.-Where parties ACCOUNT STATED. See Account, 2. ACKNOWLEDGMENT. See Criminal Law, 2; Statute of Limita- ACTIONS. ACTION AGAINST STATE-RECOVERY OF CORPORATION LICENSE TAXES— ADVERSE POSSESSION. See Dedication, 5. AFFIDAVIT. See Estates of Deceased Persons, 5. AGE. See Criminal Law, 35. (815) |