Outline of Patent Office Interference Practice1958 - 141 lappuses |
No grāmatas satura
1.–3. rezultāts no 18.
33. lappuse
... unless cause be shown why such action should not be taken . Within this period any of the motions permitted by Rules 231 to 236 may be brought , except that motions to dissolve ( Rule 232 ) must be limited to such matters as may be ...
... unless cause be shown why such action should not be taken . Within this period any of the motions permitted by Rules 231 to 236 may be brought , except that motions to dissolve ( Rule 232 ) must be limited to such matters as may be ...
35. lappuse
... unless a reissue is granted excluding claims to the conflicting subject matter , whereupon the interference will be dissolved . If a reissue application is filed for other purposes , it may be held subject to the outcome of the ...
... unless a reissue is granted excluding claims to the conflicting subject matter , whereupon the interference will be dissolved . If a reissue application is filed for other purposes , it may be held subject to the outcome of the ...
94. lappuse
... unless the vehicle speed be permitted to drop below 25 m.p.h. It is to be observed that the kickdown in the countershaft box is possible because the kickdown of the planetary is solely obtainable by accelerator pedal action above 40 ...
... unless the vehicle speed be permitted to drop below 25 m.p.h. It is to be observed that the kickdown in the countershaft box is possible because the kickdown of the planetary is solely obtainable by accelerator pedal action above 40 ...
Saturs
Introduction | 1 |
Interference in Case of Common Ownership | 11 |
Attorneys Representation of Parties with | 17 |
Autortiesības | |
2 citas sadaļas nav parādītas.
Citi izdevumi - Skatīt visu
Bieži izmantoti vārdi un frāzes
according action affidavits amend application assignee Attorneys Board burden of proof CCPA claims considered copy Corp Court of Customs Customs and Patent decision defined determination direct disclosed disclosure effect entitled establish et al evidence Examiner of Interferences extended fact failing ference filed filing date final hearing follows function further given granted ground held inter interference counts interference proceeding interpreted involved issue judgment Junior limited Manual means ment motion period motion to dissolve noted notice Objections obtained old Rule operation original panels Party's Patent Appeals Patent Office petition practice preliminary statement present Primary Examiner prior priority of invention Procedure proceedings proposed Count question reads reasons record reduction to practice reference relation request respect result senior party specified steps structure subject matter submitted suggested taken taking testimony tion United USPQ