Outline of Patent Office Interference Practice1958 - 141 lappuses |
No grāmatas satura
1.–3. rezultāts no 24.
62. lappuse
... taking of testimony in interference proceedings is governed by 35 U.S.C. 23 , 24 which take the place of Secs . 4905 ... taking testimony will be so arranged that each shall have an opportu- nity to prove his case against prior parties ...
... taking of testimony in interference proceedings is governed by 35 U.S.C. 23 , 24 which take the place of Secs . 4905 ... taking testimony will be so arranged that each shall have an opportu- nity to prove his case against prior parties ...
73. lappuse
... Taking The testimony must be taken in conformity with the re- quirements of Rules 271 to 286 , inclusive , which correspond in part to the provisions of old Rules 154 to 159 , inclusive . According to Rule 271 , which is a modification ...
... Taking The testimony must be taken in conformity with the re- quirements of Rules 271 to 286 , inclusive , which correspond in part to the provisions of old Rules 154 to 159 , inclusive . According to Rule 271 , which is a modification ...
xii. lappuse
... taking 73 Motion to strike 75 may be taken Notice of taking depositions Qualification of persons before whom depositions Requirements as to taking 74 74 74 Taking in a foreign country 75 Time for taking 62 Use in another interference or ...
... taking 73 Motion to strike 75 may be taken Notice of taking depositions Qualification of persons before whom depositions Requirements as to taking 74 74 74 Taking in a foreign country 75 Time for taking 62 Use in another interference or ...
Saturs
Introduction | 1 |
Interference in Case of Common Ownership | 11 |
Attorneys Representation of Parties with | 17 |
Autortiesības | |
2 citas sadaļas nav parādītas.
Citi izdevumi - Skatīt visu
Bieži izmantoti vārdi un frāzes
according action affidavits amend application assignee Attorneys Board burden of proof CCPA claims considered copy Corp Court of Customs Customs and Patent decision defined determination direct disclosed disclosure effect entitled establish et al evidence Examiner of Interferences extended fact failing ference filed filing date final hearing follows function further given granted ground held inter interference counts interference proceeding interpreted involved issue judgment Junior limited Manual means ment motion period motion to dissolve noted notice Objections obtained old Rule operation original panels Party's Patent Appeals Patent Office petition practice preliminary statement present Primary Examiner prior priority of invention Procedure proceedings proposed Count question reads reasons record reduction to practice reference relation request respect result senior party specified steps structure subject matter submitted suggested taken taking testimony tion United USPQ