Outline of Patent Office Interference Practice1958 - 141 lappuses |
No grāmatas satura
1.–3. rezultāts no 24.
56. lappuse
... taken in the interference or require an independent investigation . Such motions are heard and decided by the Examiner of Inter- ferences , not the Primary Examiner , and as noted else- where , a decision granting such a motion is ...
... taken in the interference or require an independent investigation . Such motions are heard and decided by the Examiner of Inter- ferences , not the Primary Examiner , and as noted else- where , a decision granting such a motion is ...
74. lappuse
... taken , and the form , certification and filing of them are stated in Rules 273 , 274 , 276 and 277.2 Further requirements as to the filing of depositions and the remedy in the case of refusal to file are set forth in Rule 278 , which ...
... taken , and the form , certification and filing of them are stated in Rules 273 , 274 , 276 and 277.2 Further requirements as to the filing of depositions and the remedy in the case of refusal to file are set forth in Rule 278 , which ...
82. lappuse
... taken an appeal to the U. S. Court of Customs and Patent Appeals , he thereby waives his right to proceed under 35 U.S.C. 145.1 66 ( c ) If a defeated party to an interference pro- ceeding has taken an appeal to the U. S. Court of ...
... taken an appeal to the U. S. Court of Customs and Patent Appeals , he thereby waives his right to proceed under 35 U.S.C. 145.1 66 ( c ) If a defeated party to an interference pro- ceeding has taken an appeal to the U. S. Court of ...
Saturs
Introduction | 1 |
Interference in Case of Common Ownership | 11 |
Attorneys Representation of Parties with | 17 |
Autortiesības | |
2 citas sadaļas nav parādītas.
Citi izdevumi - Skatīt visu
Bieži izmantoti vārdi un frāzes
according action affidavits amend application assignee Attorneys Board burden of proof CCPA claims considered copy Corp Court of Customs Customs and Patent decision defined determination direct disclosed disclosure effect entitled establish et al evidence Examiner of Interferences extended fact failing ference filed filing date final hearing follows function further given granted ground held inter interference counts interference proceeding interpreted involved issue judgment Junior limited Manual means ment motion period motion to dissolve noted notice Objections obtained old Rule operation original panels Party's Patent Appeals Patent Office petition practice preliminary statement present Primary Examiner prior priority of invention Procedure proceedings proposed Count question reads reasons record reduction to practice reference relation request respect result senior party specified steps structure subject matter submitted suggested taken taking testimony tion United USPQ