Outline of Patent Office Interference Practice1958 - 141 lappuses |
No grāmatas satura
1.–3. rezultāts no 13.
86. lappuse
... respect to operating means of which it was a part , as disclosed in that patent . It appeared that if the quoted phrase were interpreted to mean movement longitudinally of the axis of the car , as contended by the adverse party , the ...
... respect to operating means of which it was a part , as disclosed in that patent . It appeared that if the quoted phrase were interpreted to mean movement longitudinally of the axis of the car , as contended by the adverse party , the ...
103. lappuse
... respect to each other and maintaining said cross beams in parallel relation with respect to each other " ) . ( Italics supplied . ) There is thus a substantial difference in the concept of the respective parties . There can , therefore ...
... respect to each other and maintaining said cross beams in parallel relation with respect to each other " ) . ( Italics supplied . ) There is thus a substantial difference in the concept of the respective parties . There can , therefore ...
108. lappuse
... respect contains no mention of resilience in respect to the arrangement or operation of the clamping means or clips . There is no intimation or suggestion that the clips are to be adjusted or tensioned so as to allow for telescoping of ...
... respect contains no mention of resilience in respect to the arrangement or operation of the clamping means or clips . There is no intimation or suggestion that the clips are to be adjusted or tensioned so as to allow for telescoping of ...
Saturs
Introduction | 1 |
Judgment | 2 |
Interference in Case of Common Ownership | 11 |
Autortiesības | |
4 citas sadaļas nav parādītas.
Citi izdevumi - Skatīt visu
Bieži izmantoti vārdi un frāzes
72 USPQ 85 USPQ 99 USPQ affidavits Amdur application or patent assignee attorney or agent Board erred Board of Interference Board of Patent Botnen burden of proof CCPA Commissioner of Patents Copying Claims Corp Court of Customs cross beams Customs and Patent decision Declaration of Interference determination disclosed disclosure Examiner of Interferences February 28 ference filing date infra inter interference counts Interference Examiners interference issue interference proceeding inventor Junior Manual ment motion period motion to dissolve motion under Rule notice operation panels Party's application Patent Appeals patent claim Patent Interferences Patent Office patentable subject matter Primary Examiner prior art priority of invention proposed Count provided in Rule provisions of old question of priority reasons of appeal record reduction to practice reissue application request Robie Rule 94 Schriber-Schroth Co senior party show cause subject matter supra testimony tion United States Code unpatentable